4 measurements spanning 23 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 156–162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 20:55
161
+1
15 Aug 2026, 17:15
160
+3
8 Aug 2026, 18:15
157
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:56
157
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 28 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
59s
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
355 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5364304124231829519
120
33.8%
custom 5433812612229910263
109
30.7%
custom 5424972470023104089
91
25.6%
🤝
35
9.86%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 355reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2025 to 23 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @trenboloid. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2025 to 23 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
НЕНАВИСТЬ Ч.2 (ВСЕПРОЩЕНИЕ)
Долго вынашивал, теперь изливаю
Ненависть — самый простой, но и самый дорогой способ почувствовать себя живым
🤩🤩Ты думаешь, что греешься у костра, хотя на самом деле уже сам превращаешься в угли
Когда-то я очень много злился и ненавидел
Я рвал на себе волосы и бил себя в живот в бесконечных приступах злобы
Я хотел бить, рвать, калечить, убивать, но у труса не хватало духу
А зат…
"У Меня плохая генетика"
это единственное почему ты еще не добился всего, чего хотел?
Мб есть другие переменные, из-за которых нет прогресса?
Что, если есть параметры, которые ты можешь выкрутить прямо сейчас и сразу почувствовать улучшение?
СЕГОДНЯ В 16.00 встретимся с Владом Кнутовым и обсудим это, рады желающим меняться
ПОЭТОМУ СТАГНИРУЕМ...
Инфополе переполнено одинаковыми идеями типо:
"правильно питаться"
"классно тренируйся"
"хорошо восстанавливался"
и все будет.
не, нихуя не получится...
хотя бы потому что слова правильно, классно и хорошо все воспринимают по-разному
Разные цели
Разные желания
Разные вводные данные
Разные точки восприятия
Да пох так-то, можно прост хуйней страдать, а потом ливнуть, че нет в принципе))
…
НЕНАВИСТЬ
... то, что роднит человечество на протяжении всей его истории
🩸Ненависть к общему врагу объединяет🩸
😬И от этой ненависти у людей текут слюни, от чувства собственной значимости они опухают как трупы в тёплой воде
Я отомщу своим врагам
Откуда у тебя враги?
С чего ты взял, что у тебя есть враги?
Твоя агрессия, грубая и отвратительная, направлена (как тебе кажется) на врагов, но де факто уничтожает те…
ОДИНОЧЕСТВО
... это заебись
Неспособность насладиться одиночеством означает неспособность к полной реализации амбиций
💀 Одиночество — испытание силы, проверка на фактор вымирания
Люди, зависимые от нахождения обществе, увы и ах, обществу проиграют
Когда-то я думал, что не смогу выжить в одиночестве, но это совсем не так
Поговорим о сильных сторонах:
➖ Концентрация на целевых действиях
🌟 Нет отвлекающих факто…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @trenboloid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@trenboloid named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@thewayofexcellence named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гейне | Горнило чемпионов” (@trenboloid), 161 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trenboloid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
