Channel
@trawiiiii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
578subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002647742890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trawiiiii |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trawiiiii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 578 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 579 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 579 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (15 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,932 |
| Reactions total | 484 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
504 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 235 | 46.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 76 | 15.1% | |
| 💔 | 51 | 10.1% | |
| 😭 | 37 | 7.34% | |
| 😢 | 21 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 504reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всё-всё, без спойлеров, мне слишком сложно не кидать любую каракулю, которую нарисую, а не всё я могу показывать, но пост в основе с первой картинкой прорвал плотину и меня понесло, не могу остановиться 😭
❤23🔥4❤🔥3
Без помощи не выйдет 🤮
❤35🔥9❤🔥8
Но при этом всё равно стрёмно рисовать какие-то штуки из сферы, в которой я не просто не разбираюсь, а именно не являюсь частью, потому что постоянно думаю и представляю, как на эти мои картинки смотрят знающие и смеются 😣 какой же фигнёй забита моя башка 😤
😢21💔13❤3🔥1
Оказалось, кстати, это нереально интересно (я больше про комбинезоны, их отличия от пилотов формулы и всякая подобная фигня). Люблю такие штуки узнавать и применять в картинках. Ну вы поняли, типа шарю 👍
❤35🔥12
Вы бы знали, в скольких вещах мне пришлось разобраться, чтобы поучаствовать в одной крутейшей штуке, о которой я расскажу 15 августа 😊 С Михаськой, кстати, всё более менее, периодически левая лапка начинает болеть, но хотя бы нашла способ его полноценно кормить (он начал отказываться от привычного корма, буду пробовать давать другой вкус, видимо, ему разонравился запах последнего)
❤37🔥12
В клинике, кстати, в которой была, много животных всяких и есть такие обезьянки, их там штук 5-6 🕺 когда с Михалычем встала рядом, из них 4 сбежались и начали его внимательно разглядывать, такой вот он крутой 👋
❤🔥25❤11
Подтвердился прогрессирующий артрит, поставили укол, снимающий воспаление (у него опухли вчера суставы запястья), и прописали таблетки, пока точно ничего сказать нельзя, нужно пропить курс и посмотреть, будет ли положительная прогрессия 🤔 но у него всё будет супер в любом случае, он у нас крутой 🤗
❤33❤🔥7💔4🔥2
Меня во всех таких стрессовых ситуациях раздражает, что я максимально не стрессоустойчивая, абсолютно. Бесит меня именно то, что я головой могу быть полностью спокойна, точно знать, что я хочу и должна сказать, но как только начинаю открывать рот - всё, из глаз ручей, сразу мямля, но визуал-то вообще и близко не соответствует внутренней моей уверенности 🥴 😡😡😡
😭37❤7
Такое кошмарище творится, у Михалыча (вдруг, кто помнит его здесь) проблема ещё и с передними лапами началась (задние много лет не работают): часа полтора назад перестал на них вставать, не может опереться, то есть, ни встать, ни пойти, ни сесть не может 🌝 вроде и не удивительны проблемы, ему 15 лет уже, но всё равно так больно Побежала в вет клинику неподалёку, но там ничего не могу сделать вообще, нужен рентген, а…
💔34❤7
Тут, кстати, всё хорошо, ругаться не пришлось, мы обменялись наборами и мне ещё и деньги вернули 🥺
❤17🔥5
А как же Никита? 😑
❤🔥41🔥14❤8
Разложились за 28 столиком 💐 Простите, но, видимо, новой открытки с Лоэном и ещё две с тойей не будет 😭 а ещё без этой допечатки у меня теперь нет нескольких старых, так как вместо моих открыток зел коридор отдал чьи-то чужие ещё и с доплатой за срочность У них доступна только почта (туда я написала, но ответят они лет через 100) и номер телефона, который сегодня не работает и сбрасывается ботом 😵💫не хватало мне е…
❤13🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @trawiiiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 216,881 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“не трави?” (@trawiiiii), 578 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trawiiiii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.