Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хто не здох, той книжкова перекладачка

Channel

Хто не здох, той книжкова перекладачка

@translator_is_not_dead_yet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

556subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003739747416
TypeChannel
Username@translator_is_not_dead_yet
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/translator_is_not_dead_yet

Growth

521556538.58 August 2026 — 521 subscribers9 August 2026 — 527 subscribers17 August 2026 — 556 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 516–561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:26556+29
9 Aug 2026, 09:53527+6
8 Aug 2026, 12:15521first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.3%
avg views ÷ 556 subscribers
Avg views / post
319
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,188
Reactions total261
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

261 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14957.1%
🔥5521.1%
😭269.96%
💔124.60%
💘93.45%
😍41.53%
🥰41.53%
👍20.766%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC355 views84 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

✨ Кілька тижнів тому я згадувала, що працюю над секретним проєктом. І ось нарешті можу ним поділитися! Мабуть, усім перекладачам знайома ситуація, коли в текст аж проситься влучний фразеологізм, але підібрати його ніяк не вдається: • класичний словник побудований за опорними словами; • «Горох» не знаходить потрібного синоніма або взагалі переконує, що його не існує; • доводиться буквально вишукувати голку в копиці с

🔥5524🥰4💘1

6 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTCviews —

Хто не здох, той книжкова перекладачка pinned a photo

6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,110 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Благодійний розіграш на підтримку видавництва «Жорж» 📚✨ 1 серпня росія знищила склад видавництва «Жорж» у Харкові. Згоріло понад 400 000 книжок. Це важкий удар для видавництва та всієї нашої книжкової спільноти. Щоб підтримати «Жорж», я вирішила влаштувати благодійний розіграш комплекту з трьох романів Ребекки Кван у моєму перекладі та трьох особистих консультацій. Всього буде 4 переможці! 🎁 Що можна виграти та я

30👍2

5 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC109 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @townbooks

ЯК ПІДТРИМАТИ УКРАЇНСЬКІ ВИДАВНИЦТВА 💔? Знаю, що ви, можливо, вже трохи втомилися від подібних дописів і здається, ніби їх зараз занадто багато у стрічці. Але я знову й знову натрапляю на дописи про те, що маленькі та середні видавництва залишаються в тіні - про них мало інформації і їм дістається найменше підтримки. ​Тому я постаралася зібрати в одному місці всю інформацію, яку мала, яку знаю та яку відстежила в т

13

5 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC255 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ще одне моє видавництво...

😭19

5 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC160 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Book_ChefPhoto

Друзі, сьогодні вночі ми знову зазнали болючої втрати. Ракетного обстрілу зазнав наш резервний склад на базі логістичного партнера Denka Logistics, який нещодавно запрацював після знищення основного складу. Під час минулої атаки постраждав центральний склад, але ще був невеликий резервний, де зберігалась ще частина наших книг. Вогонь забрав ще понад 100 000 книг видавництва BOOKCHEF. Це всі наші складські залишки та

15

4 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC292 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не знаю як, але вона вціліла🥹

10💘6😍4

4 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC274 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhorzhclubPhoto

Замовляйте, щоб зануритись у моторошно-примарний світ Зайчиків і водночас підтримати видавництво «Жорж». Кожне ваше замовлення сьогодні допомагає нам зробити ще один крок до відновлення 🖤 У НАЯВНОСТІ! «Ми тебе любимо, Зайчику» Мона Авад 🐇 У культовому романі «Зайчик» Саманта Гезер Меккі (Сем) — самотня студентка-аутсайдерка, стипендіантка «найвинятковішої» магістерської програми з літератури Ворренського універси

15💘2

4 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC295 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Є якась дуже збочена і жорстока іронія в тому, що сіре монотонне пекло Ребекки Кван згоріло в справжньому інферно... Зате "Катабазис" увійшов до шортліста Премії блогерів 💔

27

3 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC230 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhorzhclubPhoto

~400 000 книжок «Жоржа» згоріли внаслідок ₚосійської атаки у Харкові. Це майже всі книжки, які ми мали. Але ми продовжуємо працювати над тим, щоб ви й надалі читали улюблених авторів_ок та відкривали для себе нові історії. Зібрали книжки, які зараз на передпродажі. Кожен придбаний примірник допомагає видавництву відновитися. Пишіть у директ або месенджер, щоб передзамовити. Дякуємо, що підтримуєте! А доки робимо в

15😭7

3 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC108 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhorzhclubPhoto

Шановні наші читачі, друзі видавництва «Жорж»! Ми потребували невеликої паузи в комунікації, щоб оговтатися та оцінити ситуацію. 1 серпня росія завдала удару по харківському логістичному центру RNK-Ranok. Там зберігалися й книжки видавництва «Жорж». Згоріло все. У цифрах це близько 400 000 книжок. Збитки перевищують обсяг наших річних продажів. Ми щиро вдячні вам за те, що запитували, як ми, хвилювалися за нас і п

💔12

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @translator_is_not_dead_yet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 826,447 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хто не здох, той книжкова перекладачка” (@translator_is_not_dead_yet), 556 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/translator_is_not_dead_yet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.