Channel
@transactionalanalysiss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9,641subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001007861215 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @transactionalanalysiss |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/transactionalanalysiss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 9,641 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 9,648 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 9,646 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 9,646 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (1 November 2025 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,466 |
| Reactions total | 258 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,275 reactions across 25 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 611 | 47.9% | |
| 👍 | 404 | 31.7% | |
| 👌 | 79 | 6.20% | |
| 😢 | 52 | 4.08% | |
| 💯 | 49 | 3.84% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 2.12% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 1.73% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 0.627% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 0.549% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 0.549% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.235% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.157% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.157% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.078% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.078% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,275reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اگر چیزی خوب پیش نمیرود فقط دو توضیح برای آن وجود دارد: یا مقاومت شما آزموده میشود یا باید جهت خویش را تغییر دهید. #کیمیاگر #پائولو_کوئلیو @transactionalanalysiss
❤26👍5😢2
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
خرسندی، والاترین شکل سلامت است. #دالایی_لاما @transactionalanalysiss
❤15👌4👍1
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
در عصر هوش مصنوعی، آینده متعلق به باهوشترینها نیست؛ متعلق به انسانترینهاست. ماشینها میتوانند تحلیل کنند، پیشبینی کنند و حتی خلق کنند؛ اما هنوز این انسان است که معنا میآفریند، همدلی میکند و برای دیگری اهمیت قائل میشود. شاید در آینده، تفاوت آدمها نه در میزان دانستن، که در میزان انسان ماندن باشد @transactionalanalysiss
❤33👍10👏5
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
لذت بردن را به فرزندتان یاد بدهید لذت غذا خوردن لذت به خواب رفتن لذت مطالعه کردن لذت آشپزی لذت ورزش کردن لذت حرف زدن لذت شنیدن صدای پرنده لذت دیدن ابرهای زیبا در آسمان لذت دویدن، لذت بیرون رفتن لذت خرید کردن و... لذت کار کردن در یک کلام لذت بردن از فعالیتهای روزمره زندگی... @yransactionalanalysiss
❤34👍11💯2
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
#جان_گاتمن میگه ریشهی دعوای تقریباً همهی زوجها برمیگرده به ۵ موضوع: شغل و درآمد کارهای خونه بچهها خانوادههای دو طرف روابط زناشویی اما نکتهی کلیدی و برخلاف انتظارش اینه 👇 زوجهایی که وسواس دارن همهی اختلافها رو صفر کنن، بیشتر در معرض طلاقاند. طبق پژوهشهای گاتمن: حدود ۷۰٪ اختلافهای زوجها دائمیه یعنی قرار نیست «حل» بشه. زوجهای موفق: ❌ دنبال حذف اختلاف نیستن ✅ یاد میگیرن اختلافهای حلنشدنی رو مدیریت ک…
👍14💯11❤4
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
درختِ مقدس میگویند روزی شاگردی جوان، همراه استاد نجاری خود، برای انتخاب چوب راهی جنگل شدند. استاد سالها بود که با درختان زندگی کرده بود؛ از رگ و ریشهشان میگفت و از روی بافت چوب، سرنوشت هر کدام را میخواند. ساعتی در جنگل قدم زدند تا اینکه شاگرد ناگهان ایستاد. در برابرش درختی بود سترگ، با تنهای پیچخورده، شاخههایی شکوهمند و قامتی که گویی سالها با باد و باران گفتوگو کرده بود. زیباییاش از جنس نظم نبود؛ از جنس رن…
❤54👍9💯7🔥6👎5
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
@transactionalanalysiss
👌42❤18💯6
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
مهربانی واقعی از کسی برمیآید که قدرت آسیب رساندن دارد، اما انتخاب میکند که نرمی کند. #نیچه @transactionalanalysiss
👍48❤26👏7
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
تفاوت درون گراها و برون گراها برون گراها دوست دارند مسئولیت ها و تکالیفی را که بر عهده دارند را سریع انجام دهند. آنها سریع تصمیم گیری می کنند و حتی برخی اوقات در تصمیم های خود نیز عجله می کنند. انجام دادن چندین کار برایشان راحت است و خطرپذیر هستند، آنها برای پاداش از پیشنهاد های فریبنده و گول زننده مثل دریافت پول یا مقام لذت می برند. درون گراها اغلب آرام ترند و با میل شخصی کار می کنند. آنها ترجیح می دهند که در یک ز…
❤21👍9
Signed Nazila Haghighati
@transactionalanalysiss
❤13👍9💯4🐳2
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
زنانی که مطالعه میکنند برای جامعه خطرناکند؛ زیرا آنها میتوانند دنیایی بهتر را تصور و برای به وجود آوردنش مبارزه کنند. برتراند راسل @transactionalanalysiss
❤37👍21👌11🔥4🤔4🐳2😁2
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
کلید زندگی خوب، این نیست که به چیزهای بیشتر و بیشتری اهمیت بدهید؛ بلکه باید به چیزهای کمتری اهمیت بدهید، و تنها چیزهایی را مد نظر قرار دهید که حقیقی، فوری و مهم هستند. یک واقعیت پنهان در زندگی هست؛ اینکه چیزی به نام بیخیالی وجود ندارد. شما باید به چیزی اهمیت بدهید. توجه به چیزهای مختلف و اهمیت دادن به مسائل، بخشی از جسم و بیولوژیِ ماست. مسئله این است که به چه چیزهایی اهمیت بدهیم، و چگونه به چیزهایی که هیچ اهمیتی…
❤32👍18🐳2
Signed Nazila Haghighatiii
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @transactionalanalysiss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,055,622 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@transactionalanalysiss named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تحلیل رفتار متقابل (TA)” (@transactionalanalysiss), 9,641 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/transactionalanalysiss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.