Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Трагедия каждого дня

@tragedyofeveryday

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

536subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001555013945
TypeChannel
Username@tragedyofeveryday
DescriptionДарья Железняк. Литература, философия, жизнь беспокойного сердца.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tragedyofeveryday

Growth

5367 Aug 2026, 14:35 — 536 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:49 — 536 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:358 Aug 2026, 03:49
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 535–537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:49536no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:35536first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.4%
avg views ÷ 536 subscribers
Avg views / post
270
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (15 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,702
Reactions total124
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
189
Videos
15
Links
63

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15469.7%
custom 5242292792071325160146.33%
🔥146.33%
💔114.98%
😁114.98%
custom 526721462327418416994.07%
👀83.62%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC66 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @PRO_Ilyin

Спустившись с гор Кавказа, обнаружив весьма своеобразную статейку про «не-русскую философию», нарушу всё же «священное» безмолвие и проясню некоторые моменты, касающиеся сектора истории русской философии ИФ РАН, который уже более чем 3 года является моим основным местом работы. Предварительно отмечу, что практически бóльшая часть статьи сводится к лермонтовской формуле: «было бы смешно, когда бы не было так грустно»

6

6 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC830 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Все говорят много, быстро, сердито, бессмысленно, зарекаются, наставляют, просят. Губят. Падают друг на друга. Оказывается, никто особенно не имел, не хранил своей жизни духа, все жили прислоненно к другим, да не просто, а в их отношении к общему мифу: якобы некие твердокаменные, действующие, давящие «они», которым если не подчиниться, то уже хорошо, благородно и достаточно. Здесь много литературной игры. Вообразить

7🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hungryphil

По поводу нового пасквиля в адрес ИФ РАН Прежде всего, выражаю поддержку Владимиру Сидорину, Николаю Герасимову, Рустему Вахитову, Борису Межуеву, Алексею Малинову, Василию Ванчугову. То, что я знаю об этих людях, в том числе из чтения их работ и из личного общения, не позволяет делать вывод, что их творчество сколь-нибудь вредит интересам России. Скорее, наоборот. Теперь по сути вопроса. Автор обвиняет коллектив И

6

4 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC168 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Читая О. М. Ноговицына… «Это вам не Лосев»! Ноговицын несказанно прекрасен, но со всем изяществом мыслит всё же в русле структурной антропологии и философии культуры, т.е. целиком впадая в генезис символических форм. И тяжело читать простую формулу: «миф – ино-быт-и-е ри-ту-а-ла», ибо тут миф перестает быть и начинает не быть как историко-культурный феномен. Ритуал «разыграл» сакральный смысл, а миф его умертвил, пе

6👀3💔1custom 52672146232741841691

29 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC253 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Так родилась философия. ____ «Смерть Сократа», Русский музей.

23

28 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC230 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rusphilMSUPhoto

155 лет Сергею Николаевичу Булгакову 🧔 Русский философ, богослов, экономист, один из выдающихся деятелей России и русского зарубежья протоиерей Сергий Булгаков родился 28 июля (по другим данным 28 июня) 1871 года. Будущий о. Сергий родился и вырос в семье священника кладбищенской Вознесенской церкви г. Ливны Николая Васильевича Булгакова и Александры Косминичны Азбукиной. Вспоминая своих родителей, философ позднее

8

27 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC176 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

..захлебнувшись прохладой соленых балтийских ветров.

17custom 52672146232741841694

23 Jul 2026, 23:32 UTC277 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Неизбежная встреча философии со сферой аскезы породила все самое прекрасное и все самое безобразное в нашей с вами философической жизни. ________ Вырезка из статьи «Аскетика неоплатоническая и аскетика христианская» Д.В. Бугая и А.С. Ильиной.

custom 524229279207132516094

21 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC285 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Гностицизм как отрицание истории Ехала я в такси по солнечно-летней Москве. Водитель заговорил. Долго лилась его речь: с остановками, несвязными перелетами с темы на тему, с переходами почти на крик для пущего моего слушания. Но всё об одном. О дуальном мире и иллюзиях жизни, об отсутствии прошлого и настоящего, о хитром боге-Дьяволе-демиурге, заставившем нас жить и страдать. О тайном знании, хранящемся только в То

13custom 52672146232741841694custom 52422927920713251602

16 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC306 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rusphilMSUPhoto

145 лет Василию Васильевичу Зеньковскому 😁 Философ, богослов, педагог, историк русской философской мысли, протопресвитер Василий Зеньковский родился 16 июля (4 июля по старому стилю) 1881 года. Как и многие русские религиозные мыслители, к занятиям философией и богословием Василий Васильевич пришёл через период увлечения естествознанием — изначально в 1900 г. он поступает на естественно-математический факультет Кие

8

8 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC313 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Кожаные ризы» Провожая первых людей из Рая, Бог одел их «в одежды кожаные» (Быт. 3:32). Кожаные ризы – это не про телесность, но про смертность как вторую природу, в которую облекся человек после падения. Святитель Григорий Нисский говорил, что если до падения человек был наг от покрова мертвых кож, то впоследствии был облечен в них, и таким образом «смертность, взятая от природы существ неразумных, была Божествен

12💔4🔥3

7 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC273 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hungryphil

Слово Слово — та тонкая, почти иллюзорная линия, что отделяет нас от животных. Простое умение произносить звуки в правильном порядке. Из различных связок слов рождаются культура, экономика, политика, наука, религия. Коллективный труд был бы невозможен без его опосредования словом: цивилизации, города, машины, одежда, хлеб на столе — дело не только наших рук, но и наших языков. Такова творческая сила речи. Потому не

7👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tragedyofeveryday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 527,333 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Трагедия каждого дня” (@tragedyofeveryday), 536 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tragedyofeveryday.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.