Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alex Bettex - Betting Underground

Channel

Alex Bettex - Betting Underground

@tradingsportifbettex

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

422subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001429913613
TypeChannel
Username@tradingsportifbettex
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tradingsportifbettex

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4224344287 August 2026 — 433 subscribers8 August 2026 — 433 subscribers15 August 2026 — 434 subscribers22 August 2026 — 431 subscribers28 August 2026 — 428 subscribers6 September 2026 — 427 subscribers14 September 2026 — 422 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 420–436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 10:19422-5
6 Sept 2026, 15:01427-1
28 Aug 2026, 11:43428-3
22 Aug 2026, 07:19431-3
15 Aug 2026, 17:35434+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:17433no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:51433first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 06s
Average length
6m 06s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4182.0%
👍816.0%
🔥12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 18:37 UTC325 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍3

30 May 2026, 22:25 UTC488 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 TRADE DU JOUR : 👉 31/05 : Zaragoza / Malaga : Malaga @1,86 ❤️ LE TRADE D'ALEX : 👉 31/05 : Zaragoza / Malaga : Malaga @1,86

❤2👍2

23 May 2026, 21:40 UTC442 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 TRADE DU JOUR : 👉 24/05 : FC Andorra / AD Ceuta FC : FC Andorra @1,51 ❤️ LE TRADE D'ALEX : 👉 24/05 : FC Andorra / AD Ceuta FC : FC Andorra @1,51

❤3👍2

22 May 2026, 22:57 UTC344 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 TRADE DU JOUR : 👉 23/05 : Lazio / Pisa : Lazio lay @1,66 👉 23/05 : Getafe / Osasuna : Getafe Lay @2,88 👉 23/05 : Alaves / Rayo Vallecano : Alaves @2.66 ❤️ LE TRADE D'ALEX : 👉 23/05 : Lazio / Pisa : Lazio lay @1,66

❤2

18 May 2026, 19:49 UTC346 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 TRADE DU JOUR : 👉 19/05 : AC Monza / Juve Stabia : AC Monza lay @1,86 👉 19/05 : Bournemouth / Manchester City : Manchester City @1,72 👉 19/05 : Chelsea / Tottenham : Chelsea @2.04 ❤️ LE TRADE D'ALEX : 👉 19/05 : AC Monza / Juve Stabia : AC Monza lay @1,86

❤2

16 May 2026, 22:14 UTC264 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 TRADE DU JOUR : 👉 17/05 : Nice / Metz : Over 2,5 goals @1,66 👉 17/05 : Kayserispor / Konyaspor : Kayserispor @1,91 👉 17/05 : Levante / Mallorca : Levante @2,16 👉 17/05 : Lyon / Lens : Lyon @1,77 👉 17/05 : Brest / Angers : Over 2,5 goals @1,89 ❤️ LE TRADE D'ALEX : 👉 17/05 : Nice / Metz : Over 2,5 goals @1,66

❤6

15 May 2026, 21:50 UTC231 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 TRADE DU JOUR : 👉 16/05 : Lausanne / Grasshoppers Zurich : Lausanne @1,46 ❤️ LE TRADE D'ALEX : 👉 16/05 : Lausanne / Grasshoppers Zurich : Lausanne @1,46

❤2

12 May 2026, 20:38 UTC257 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 TRADE DU JOUR : 👉 13/05 : Villarreal / Sevilla : Villarreal @2,08 ❤️ LE TRADE D'ALEX : 👉 13/05 : Villarreal / Sevilla : Villarreal @2,08

❤4

9 May 2026, 21:27 UTC284 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 TRADE DU JOUR : 👉 10/05 : Coquimbo Unido / Huachipato : Coquimbo Unido @1,91 ❤️ LE TRADE D'ALEX : 👉 10/05 : Coquimbo Unido / Huachipato : Coquimbo Unido @1,91

❤2

9 May 2026, 14:16 UTC207 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Tu as fait des bénéfices en avril ?

  1. Oui avec le jeu en sec6%
  2. Oui avec les trades d'alex12%
  3. Oui avec les trades du jour0%
  4. Non avec le jeu en sec0%
  5. Non avec les trades d'alex6%
  6. Non avec les trades du jour0%
  7. Je veux voir les réponses76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tradingsportifbettex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 May 2026, 14:16 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Tu as fait des bénéfices en avril ?

  1. Oui avec le jeu en sec6%
  2. Oui avec les trades d'alex12%
  3. Oui avec les trades du jour0%
  4. Non avec le jeu en sec0%
  5. Non avec les trades d'alex6%
  6. Non avec les trades du jour0%
  7. Je veux voir les réponses76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 11 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alex Bettex - Betting Underground” (@tradingsportifbettex), 422 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradingsportifbettex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.