Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Trades with Chablo

@tradeswithchablo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

189subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001869595283
TypeChannel
Username@tradeswithchablo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tradeswithchablo

Growth

1891911907 August 2026 — 191 subscribers8 August 2026 — 191 subscribers14 August 2026 — 189 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 189–191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:38189-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:00191no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:23191first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2038.5%
1528.8%
👍1121.2%
👀23.85%
👏23.85%
🥰23.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 3 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Feb 2026, 20:56 UTC82 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The above levels have been struck, I will look for another ETH long and update here

👏2

3 Feb 2026, 18:06 UTC83 viewsread 8 August 2026

My next key levels for BTC and ETH are $73,800 and $2,100. Once these levels are struck I’d be keen to look for some more longs.

28 Jan 2026, 00:11 UTC100 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

As BTC has approached some tricky zones soon we will get a good sign to see if we can hold these levels and start breaking out higher soon. As for now I’m not moving to breakeven yet but you can if you’d like and I still expect some volatility in this area and with FOMC later today.

🔥2

21 Jan 2026, 21:43 UTCviews —

Trades with Chablo pinned «🚨 ETH ⏰ Trade : LONG ✅ Entry : $2900 (Current Market Price) 🎯 Targets: $3400 / $3655 /$4950 ⛔ SL: $2773»

21 Jan 2026, 18:30 UTC77 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Considering this is a long term swing trade even if I get stopped once or twice I will look to re enter as it’s a high conviction trade.

🔥3

21 Jan 2026, 18:29 UTC89 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨 ETH ⏰ Trade : LONG ✅ Entry : $2900 (Current Market Price) 🎯 Targets: $3400 / $3655 /$4950 ⛔ SL: $2773

👍2🔥2🥰1

20 Jan 2026, 15:35 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The market is coming into some key zones I have been monitoring, some potential long plays might be coming so stay tuned just need some more confirmations and sweeps 🧹 ✅

👍2🔥2

16 Jan 2026, 09:59 UTC78 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Today I did my first purchase on the Solana coin I mentioned. $USA https://dexscreener.com/solana/HKprCtGbnh1j8xeQggzWhhVd3kwDUdphqPqDP8vMay8b I’m not aiming for the most hyped or recent coin, I’m looking at upside potential and communities. I’ll look to enter some more at a better opportunity if it comes.

🔥41

16 Jan 2026, 09:55 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Nice current reaction of filling the first CME gap 👌🏻

👍2

5 Jan 2026, 09:22 UTC69 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

During such move I have my eyes on more $ALGO, $CRV and $VELO. I also have on my watchlist a coin on the solana chain that I’d be looking to hold along side my portfolio, I’ll keep you updated if I purchase any 🤖

3

5 Jan 2026, 09:21 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Considering we have wiped out a lot of short liquidations I think it’s inevitable we take out some long liquidations around the $87,000 mark where there are $1.4B liquidations sitting also, this would also align with filling the 2 BTC CME futures Gaps❕ The market moves from liquidity to liquidity and although it would be nice to just straight rip up we have to be realistic 🙆‍♂️ This would also align with market psy

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tradeswithchablo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,211,083 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trades with Chablo” (@tradeswithchablo), 189 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradeswithchablo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.