2 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 701–702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 14:00
702
+1
19 Sept 2026, 03:22
701
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
44 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
16
36.4%
👎
10
22.7%
👍
5
11.4%
💯
5
11.4%
❤
4
9.09%
😁
2
4.55%
👏
1
2.27%
😭
1
2.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
EAFC 26 vs EAFC 27 Beta 📉
Під час Web App майже всі виконували завдання трансферного ринку. Це був один із найпростіших способів заробити свої перші монети ще до офіційного релізу гри.
У EAFC 26 за виконання завдання (виставити 500 карток і купити 500 карток) давали 12 000 монет.
У бета-версії EAFC 27 за це ж завдання можна отримати максимум 5 000 монет.
Мінус 58% нагороди за один із найважливіших способів заробі…
Мої перші думки про SBC у #EAFC27 Beta...
Нова система здається мені дуже дивною.
Я думав завершити один із найпростіших стартових SBC, вартістю 250 очок, але для цього мені довелося б віддати майже весь мій клуб:
• 11 рідкісних бронзових гравців (10 очок кожен)
• 2 рідкісних срібних гравці (20 очок кожен)
• 2 рідкісних золотих гравці (50 очок кожен)
Разом: 250 очок
Поточні значення очок:
🔸 Рідкісний бронзовий =…
💰 Цікава зміна, яку помітив у бета-версії EAFC 27.
🔹 Рідкісні золоті картки (Rare Gold):
• Мінімальна ціна Buy Now — 300 монет (у EAFC 26 було 600)
• Швидкий продаж (Quick Sell) — 280 монет (у EAFC 26 було 546)
Також у грі більше немає звичайних (Common) карток — тепер усі гравці мають статус Rare.
📌 Мій висновок: схоже, EA ще більше підштовхує гравців купувати FC Points. Через майже вдвічі меншу вартість Quick Se…
Trade Master звіт 😄📈
Купив 61x Jordi Alba по 300 монет
Загальна інвестиція: 18,300
Середній продаж: 5.5K
Загальний ретерн після 5% EA tax: 318,725
Профіт: +300,425 монет
ROI на кожній карті: ~1500–2000% 🤯
EA мене точно забанить чи ще рано? 😂 #EAFC #TradingTips
Найбільш логічне запитання... чому тільки 1 карту??
×2 на карті за тиждень очікування💰
Багато карт взяли?
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @trademaster_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AJAX FA | FC 27 @AJAXFA · 24,019 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trade Master EAFC 🇺🇦” (@trademaster_official), 702 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trademaster_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.