Channel
@tradejournal11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
980subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001620006424 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradejournal11 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradejournal11 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 980 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 979 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
262 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 240 | 91.6% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 8.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 262reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tradejournal11. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 April 2025 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
دروود دوستان در آکادمی سیمرغ بصورت مستمر و رایگان با مطالب دوره ای که رایگان منتشر شده تحلیل روزانه و ریکپ همان روز ارائه میشه که بصورت عملی مطالب سبک رو هر روز در چارت پیاده سازی میکنیم
❤4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WQx45OE8aA درود به همراهان گرامی آکادمی سیمرغ مارکت ریکپ امروز هست حتما ویدیوهارا دنبال کنید چون قطعا نکاتی هست که شاید مفید باشه براتون🙏🏻
مطالب حاصل چند سال تجربه س منتظرتون هستم❤️
❤8
درود به همه ی تریدرهای جهان و با آرزوی موفقیت برای تک تک عزیزان قدر زر زرگر شناسد قدر گوهر گوهری https://t.me/simorghacademyfx https://www.youtube.com/@SimorghAcademyFX @SimorghacademySupport
❤7
سلام دوستان خوبین میدونم چند وقت نبودم ولی دست پر امدم با چند نفر یه اکادمی ترید زدیم هرشب مارکت ریکپ داریم تحلیل تریدا روزانه اموزش و ترید کلییی مطلب میتونید یاد بگیرید ❤️❤️
❤9
بیاین حساب کنیم اگه وین ریت ۶۰ داشته باشیم و ریوارد ۲ توی ۱۰۰ تا معامله چقدر میتونیم سود کنیم فرض کنیم که من یه حساب ۱۰۰۰ دلاری دارم و روی هر معامله ۱ درصد یعنی ۱۰ دلار ریسک میکنم خوب وین ریت ۶۰ یعنی از هر ۱۰۰ تا ترید ۶۰ تاش تی پی میشه و ۴۰ تاش استاپ پس داریم 40×(-10)=-400 60×(20)=1200 1200-400=800 پس ما توی ۱۰۰ ترید ۸۰۰ دلار سود میکنیم که میشه ۸۰ درصد حالا بیاین حساب کنیم که با وین ریت ۵۰ چقدر میتونیم سود کنیم 50×…
❤55👎8
اگر روزی درباره ی تو از من بپرسند! کوتاه می گویم: در نهایتِ نااُمیدی… امید من بود… تولدتون مبارک
❤50👎14
آنگاه که برای انجام کار به روش شخصی رسیدی به آیین خودت مومن باش
❤19
خب، بذار یه چیزی بهت بگم. وقتی یادمون میاد چرا این راهو انتخاب کردیم، یه جوری انرژی میگیریم که نگو و نپرس! اصلاً انگار باتریهامون شارژ میشه. این کار باعث میشه که وقتی با مشکلات روبرو میشیم، جا نزنیم و با کله بریم جلو. میدونی چیه؟ وقتی رو انگیزههامون تمرکز میکنیم، بهتر میفهمیم چی برامون مهمه و تصمیمهای بهتری میگیریم. تازه، یادمون میاد که هر قدم کوچیک هم ما رو به آرزوهامون نزدیکتر میکنه. پس بیا و هر روز یه کم…
❤20
🔰مصاحبه با ایف میانته فروردین 1404 و پاسخ به سوالات معامله گران و علاقه مندان سبک RTM در ایران.
❤8
دوستان عزیز مطالبی را در ابتدا برای آشنایی با ایف میانته و سبک RTM به اشتراک میگذاریم و سپس مصاحبه صمیمی و داغی که دوست عزیز و هموطنمان جناب سینا از اعضای آکادمی آر تی ام با ایف میانته انجام دادند که بر اساس سوالات شما عزیزان در کانال شله قلمکار ترتیب داده شدند را در اینجا به اشتراک میگذاریم. کانال شله قلمکار به اینکه بعنوان بستری برای انتشار این ویدیو و ارتباط جامعه معامله گران و علاقه مندان در این زمینه در ایران …
اینم ورود
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tradejournal11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“My trading journal” (@tradejournal11), 980 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradejournal11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.