Channel
@trade_rumour
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
145subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003095921016 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trade_rumour |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trade_rumour |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 145 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 145 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Rumour.app has it that Hunter Biden was asked how he would fight Elizabeth Warren’s anti-crypto army. His answer was just one word: “Hyperliquid.” Right as risk-on starts looking shaky, $HYPE somehow becomes the most unexpected political crypto answer on the timeline. https://www.rumour.app/rumours/42c7d70b-5f53-4a7a-bfd8-fc7a304c0b11
Rumour.app has it that Haseeb, managing partner at Dragonfly, thinks the market misunderstood the recently patched Zcash bug. His take: if exploited, it would not have meant unlimited $ZEC instantly flooding exchanges. The real risk was inside the shielded pool, where counterfeit shielded $ZEC could have diluted holders who stayed there. Bigger warning: AI is now surfacing serious bugs across crypto, and security …
Rumour.app has it that Deribit sees Bitcoin’s $60K level as a major liquidation risk. With more than $1.2B in $BTC put open interest sitting at the $60K strike, a break below could push market makers to hedge short gamma by selling spot or futures. If leverage starts unwinding too, that line could quickly turn into a cascade trigger. Thoughts? https://www.rumour.app/rumours/ad88abc6-e48b-45ce-bc5d-64f218faea63
Rumour.app has it that Tea Protocol may have abandoned its community following the $TEA token launch. Critics point to the token's sharp decline and claims that promised airdrops and community incentives have yet to be distributed. They argue that users spent years participating in testnets and supporting the ecosystem with expectations of future rewards, only to be left with nothing. Presale investors are also rep…
Rumour.app has it that Forward Industries just moved 455,784 $SOL to Coinbase Prime after a month of inactivity. That’s around $31.87M worth of $SOL, while the company is reportedly sitting on a nearly $1.13B paper loss from its Solana treasury bet. Custody move, or early sign of an unwind? https://www.rumour.app/rumours/90aa1538-ae14-449b-9825-5615e8e7779e
Rumour.app has it that Zcash just confirmed a critical bug that could have allowed unlimited counterfeit $ZEC inside a shielded pool. The bug was found by security researcher Taylor Hornby and has now been fixed. The team says exploitation is unlikely, but because the pool is shielded, there is no clear way to know yet. $ZEC is down 25% as the market reacts to the uncertainty. Thoughts? https://www.rumour.app/ru…
Rumour.app has it that Wintermute thinks crypto may need AI mania to cool before investors care about Bitcoin again. The view gained traction after Wintermute’s head of OTC, Jake Ostrovskis, said crypto may need “some of the air coming out of the AI trade” to regain market attention. The comment comes as Bitcoin struggles for momentum while AI stocks, semiconductor names, and upcoming mega IPOs continue to dominate…
Rumour.app has it that the Arthur Hayes playbook may be back after he revealed he dumped his entire $HYPE and $NEAR positions. Hayes says he will explain the move in his upcoming “Reality Test” essay, citing higher energy prices, AI IPOs, possible anti-AI politics from Trump, and his view that markets could peak between now and September. The post quickly triggered backlash, with parts of the community accusing him…
Rumour.app has it that Strategy’s MSTR-STRC structure may be facing its first real stress test. The comparison gained traction as $MSTR and $STRC came under pressure, with some pointing to similarities with $LUNA-UST: reflexivity, yield, a core backing asset, and market trust holding the system together. Others argue the comparison is overstated. Unlike $UST, STRC is preferred equity issued by a company holding a l…
Rumour.app has it that Charles Hoskinson may be distancing himself from Cardano. The narrative gained traction after recent comments and a video clip that some interpreted as frustration with the ecosystem's direction. Supporters of the view point to ADA's prolonged weakness, ecosystem setbacks, and Hoskinson's repeated reminders that he does not have unilateral control over the network. Others argue he is not aban…
Rumour.app has it that Tom Lee is running the STRC playbook for BMNR, and the math is actually interesting. BitMine wants to raise $300M at a 9.5% dividend, creating around $28.5M/year in obligations. With $ETH staking yield around 2.7%, BMNR could generate roughly $296M/year, more than 10x what it owes. The catch: if $ETH falls to around $1,200, staking yield may no longer cover the obligation. Is this a sustain…
Rumour.app has it that Bank of America has appointed senior trading executive Adam Dixon as its new “Global Head of Digital Asset Transformation” to lead the bank’s crypto strategy. The role will reportedly cover tokenized assets, stablecoins, digital collateral, crypto trading settlement, custody, and wider DLT adoption. Another sign that major banks are moving from watching crypto to building around it. https://…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @trade_rumour. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 569,783 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rumour.app: New Rumours” (@trade_rumour), 145 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trade_rumour.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.