Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗧r𝗮c𝗸 𝗫

@track_x5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003208354288
TypeChannel
Username@track_x5
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/track_x5

Growth

912 Aug 2026, 23:16 — 9 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 06:33 — 9 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 23:1613 Aug 2026, 06:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:339no change
12 Aug 2026, 23:169first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 11 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
94.4%
avg views ÷ 9 subscribers
Avg views / post
8.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held16 (11 May 202616 July 2026)
Views total17
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 40s
Average length
1m 50s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52291425986433862062230.6%
custom 52941634256377218782129.2%
😈1520.8%
💘1419.4%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @opposite_abjPhoto

🔤фициальное заявление лейбла 🥚 🧩반대 🎀abel 🐰 //Здравствуйте, с вами Мэй, совладелец лейбла. Группы Savagery и Track X объявляют о групповом ресте. Это решение каждой участницы. У Savagery выйдет ещё одна песня в рамках их новой эры. (✈️) Savagery (✈️) Track X ▫️🎀🧩🎀🔔!🎀🥚🎀🎁🎀

20 May 2026, 23:35 UTC83 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎀🚘 🌟ebut ® 🌟True ITZY 🚗 🎀It's like, It's like, It's like GOLD! 🃏 ➿🎀➿➿🚗➿.➿🎀➿ Song : GOLD ➿🎀➿➿🚗➿.➿🎀➿ Group : TRACK X 🌟TRACK X - - DO NOT RUSE, WE HAVE TO BECOME❤️❤️ (✈️) : @track_x5 . °▫️❤️🎀💜!🎀🎀 🎁🎀

custom 52291425986433862067custom 52941634256377218785😈4💘2

19 May 2026, 17:23 UTC82 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎀🚘 🌟easer ® True ITZY🚗 🎀It's like, It's like, It's like GOLD! ➰ ➿🎀➿➿🚗➿.➿🎀➿ Date : 20.05 ➿🎀➿➿🚗➿.➿🎀➿ Song : GOLD 🌟TRACK X - - DO NOT RUSE, WE HAVE TO BECOME💯 ✈️ @track_x5

💘3😈3custom 52291425986433862063custom 52941634256377218782

13 May 2026, 12:06 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

𐔌 . 𝔸𝕓𝕠𝕦𝕥 𝔾𝕣𝕠𝕦𝕡 🎙️ 🦄 . ✧ — — ˗ˋ ୨୧ ˊ˗ — — ✧ . « 🎶 𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝒳-𝑒𝓁𝓁𝒶 - 💜 ─── • 𝒳-𝑒𝓁𝓁𝒶: Кавер группа, которая 🧸 › покорит ваши hearts ¡! 🏁 ─── { ± 𝒦𝒶𝓇𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒶 , 𝑀𝑒𝒿𝒾 / 💟 🍯 * 𝑅𝑒𝒾𝑔𝒾𝓃 & 𝑅𝒾𝓍𝒾 ÷ " #XELLA | #ABOUTUS " » 🕴️ . 𝒯𝑔𝓀 :: @x_ella_official ⓘ / . 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕓𝕖𝕤𝕥 𝕚𝕟 𝕆𝕌 🧪

11 May 2026, 10:35 UTC199 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

▫️🤩🤩🚘 🌟𝗯o𝘂t u𝘀®🤩 🌟 𝗧r𝘂e I𝗧Z𝗬 🚗 🎀𝗜t's l𝗶k𝗲, I𝘁's l𝗶k𝗲, 𝗶t'𝘀 𝗹i𝗸e 𝗚O𝗟𝗗 🚗 ▫️➿🤩➿➿ 🚗 ➿.➿🤩➿ M𝗲m𝗯e𝗿s : 🌟🌟🌟 I𝗸a 🚘 N𝗶k𝘀i𝗲🎀 N𝗮n𝗶 🤩S𝗼n𝗺i ❤️ 𝗦h𝗮n𝗲𝗹 ▫️➿🤩➿➿ 🚗 ➿.➿🤩➿ 🌟 𝗧R𝗔C𝗞 𝗫-- D𝗢 N𝗢T R𝗨S𝗘, 𝗪E H𝗔V𝗘 T𝗢 B𝗘C𝗢M𝗘🤩 🔹 @track_x5

custom 52291425986433862064💘3😈2custom 52941634256377218782

11 May 2026, 10:35 UTC88 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🚗 🌟𝗿o𝗳i𝗹e O5🤩 𝗧r𝘂e C𝗵a𝗲r𝘆e𝗼n𝗴 -- L𝗮n𝗮⛔️ 🎀𝗜t's l𝗶k𝗲, I𝘁's l𝗶k𝗲, 𝗶t'𝘀 𝗹i𝗸e 𝗚O𝗟𝗗 🚗 ▫️➿🤩➿➿ 🚗 ➿.➿🤩➿ 𝗠d𝘁i - I𝗡F𝗣 ✍️ 🤩 🤩 🌟 A𝗴e - 16 𝘆e𝗮r𝘀 ▫️➿🤩➿➿ 🚗 ➿.➿🤩➿ 🌟 𝗧R𝗔C𝗞 𝗫-- D𝗢 N𝗢T R𝗨S𝗘, 𝗪E H𝗔V𝗘 T𝗢 B𝗘C𝗢M𝗘🤩 🔹 @track_x5

custom 52941634256377218784💘2😈2custom 52291425986433862062

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @track_x5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,269,787 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗧r𝗮c𝗸 𝗫” (@track_x5), 9 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/track_x5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.