Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TR3NDSETTERS.

@tr3ndsetters

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

84subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002667065680
TypeChannel
Username@tr3ndsetters
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 9 April 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tr3ndsetters

Growth

8413 Aug 2026, 22:50 — 84 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 21:58 — 84 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 22:5014 Aug 2026, 21:58
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:5884no change
13 Aug 2026, 22:5084first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 50s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

162 reactions across 6 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 61208563298850613833119.1%
custom 61208979652980280462414.8%
custom 61208211369230374042113.0%
custom 6120496682208596335169.88%
custom 6120752812583292985169.88%
custom 612040547428309852984.94%
custom 612043156620942079384.94%
custom 612044334730471518784.94%
🏆74.32%
custom 612071055869503483953.09%
💋53.09%
42.47%
🍾42.47%
🎉42.47%
❤‍🔥10.617%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 24 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tr3ndsetters. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 April 2025 to 24 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 May 2025, 12:44 UTC≈1,760 views31 reactions7 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

no taglines needed— you already know who we are ®

custom 612089796529802804611custom 61208563298850613838custom 61208211369230374043custom 61204054742830985292custom 61207105586950348392custom 61207528125832929852custom 61204315662094207931custom 61204433473047151871

14 May 2025, 15:09 UTC541 viewsread 13 August 2026

good news, upper east siders— new york’s elite are expanding! sfs, anyone? @tr3ndsettersbot 🌟

12 May 2025, 06:25 UTC≈1,430 views17 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌟ALERT THE TR3NDSETTERS ARE GONE. The elite are whispering, the Upper East Side is shaken, and the drama is hotter than a SoHo rooftop in July. This city doesn’t feel the same without them. Help us find the missing icon: CLOSED and maybe— just maybe— we’ll let you in. 🤩 Are you ready to become part of New York’s newest obsession? cause the city doesn’t sleep— and neither does the gossip. XOXO, TST 💋

custom 61208211369230374046custom 61204054742830985292custom 61204966822085963352custom 61207528125832929852custom 61208563298850613832custom 61204315662094207931custom 61204433473047151871custom 61207105586950348391

5 May 2025, 17:00 UTC≈1,520 views35 reactions6 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Cheers to One Month of Us! 🖤

custom 61208979652980280469custom 61204966822085963356custom 61208563298850613835custom 61207528125832929854custom 61204433473047151873custom 61208211369230374043custom 61204315662094207932custom 61207105586950348392

5 May 2025, 07:30 UTC≈1,330 views22 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

happy children's day 🖤

custom 61208563298850613838custom 61208979652980280464custom 61204433473047151873custom 61207528125832929853custom 61208211369230374042custom 61204054742830985291custom 61204315662094207931

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tr3ndsetters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 569,572 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TR3NDSETTERS.” (@tr3ndsetters), 84 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tr3ndsetters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.