Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЗАКРЫТО 《архив》 | the promise of hope confessions!

@tpofcf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

444subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001814655196
TypeChannel
Username@tpofcf
Created13 May 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tpofcf

Growth

444445444.57 Aug 2026, 20:01 — 445 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:04 — 445 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:08 — 444 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:018 Aug 2026, 19:08
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 444–445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:08444-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:04445no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:01445first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

336 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏7221.4%
6920.5%
🔥3811.3%
🌭298.63%
💘257.44%
🍌195.65%
❤‍🔥164.76%
👎144.17%
🙊123.57%
🥰113.27%
🌚72.08%
👍72.08%
😐61.79%
🍓41.19%
👀20.595%
💋20.595%
🦄20.595%
👾10.298%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2024 to 30 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2025, 01:59 UTC≈1,480 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

кв спойлеры очень к длс на счёт возрождения я пока не решил но хвастаюсь что я прошёл я на эту хуетень почти 5 часов убил но в целом доволен

24🌭7💘3👏1

Signed позер дядя лёша альцестович (!) 🧀 < 🛸🤿/🍺🎸/🦀🧪 > [he/they]

29 Jul 2025, 22:43 UTC≈1,450 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мой в шляпе

🌭9👏2

Signed позер дядя лёша альцестович (!) 🧀 < 🛸🤿/🍺🎸/🦀🧪 > [he/they]

29 Jul 2025, 22:38 UTC≈1,360 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ребята какой ваш любимый таракан из тараканов соседа

🙊12🌚7🌭2👏1

Signed позер дядя лёша альцестович (!) 🧀 < 🛸🤿/🍺🎸/🦀🧪 > [he/they]

29 Jul 2025, 20:40 UTC≈1,290 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

блин ну лан погодите я в эту новую залупу поиграю и буду думать возвраждаться не возраждаться ато полтора года с закрытия прошло хз есть ли в этом смысл вообще

🔥14🌭5👀21💘1

Signed позер дядя лёша альцестович (!) 🧀 < 🛸🤿/🍺🎸/🦀🧪 > [he/they]

29 Jul 2025, 20:36 UTC≈1,270 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

а че новой конфы по тпоху нет??

🍌116🌭3

Signed позер дядя лёша альцестович (!) 🧀 < 🛸🤿/🍺🎸/🦀🧪 > [he/they]

29 Jul 2025, 20:33 UTC≈1,230 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

блин там длс вышло мож конфу возродить

🔥164🌭3

Signed позер дядя лёша альцестович (!) 🧀 < 🛸🤿/🍺🎸/🦀🧪 > [he/they]

25 Jul 2024, 13:21 UTC≈3,990 views125 reactionsread 8 August 2026

лолофандому соболезную,остальным привет

👏68💘20👎10❤‍🔥8👍7😐62💋2

Signed позер хехехе 🦭 [he/they]

23 Jul 2024, 19:09 UTC≈3,750 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

вот для сашатоновцев

🔥4

Signed позер хехехе 🦭 [he/they]

23 Jul 2024, 19:09 UTC≈3,690 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sashatonikf

чуваки которые хотят сашатанчиков идите ко мнк...

20❤‍🔥3

Signed позер хехехе 🦭 [he/they]

23 Jul 2024, 19:06 UTC≈3,560 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🍓4

Signed позер хехехе 🦭 [he/they]

23 Jul 2024, 19:06 UTC≈3,100 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

э бля забыл сказать давайте без сашатонов и проблематик пейров ну проста да

👎4

Signed позер хехехе 🦭 [he/they]

23 Jul 2024, 19:05 UTC≈2,940 viewsread 8 August 2026

ну я думаю тут всё ясно что выигрывает пейр тпоха!! предлагайте пейринги в коменты вы мне восстановлением актива в канале даёте стимул таки допройти игру хех

Signed позер хехехе 🦭 [he/they]

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tpofcf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2024, 18:01 UTCFinal Results46 voters

я забыл :(

  1. какой-нибудь шип тпоха50%
  2. лолофд17%
  3. патриотизм мориарти4%
  4. ксб музик9%
  5. ласт рейв или чота похожее4%
  6. да не трогай пусть лежит просто так15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2024 to 30 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗАКРЫТО 《архив》 | the promise of hope confessions!” (@tpofcf), 444 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tpofcf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.