Channel
@tphobicST
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002898016478 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tphobicST |
| Description | бот - @tphobicST_bot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tphobicST |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 48 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 48 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
106 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5282878656765526213 | 37 | 34.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5461087595884739952 | 10 | 9.43% | |
| custom 5460648078996445403 | 9 | 8.49% | |
| custom 5341645036419305217 | 8 | 7.55% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 7.55% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 6.60% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 6.60% | |
| custom 5330247129518599860 | 1 | 0.943% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 14 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪽 : CONFESSION . 😅😘 ﹫. design 💔 😻🌟 ‹ adapter.http//design_conf ➡️ хочешь узнать честную оценку своего профиля в тг? или может хочешь сам оценивать чужие оформления? .. 🦴 . welc)ome 🌟🌟🌟 ⟩ ⟩ mp pöst & rt pôst ⋮ bot 4 takés cc . 🧣 boost
ладно, рассказываю просто так. шутка вот в чём: моанатаны = стонатаны. а в СТОНатанах есть стон, moan по-английски. смешно, да? я сама придумала. ну скажите, что смешно😭 🧉: ну 50/50 #тейк @tphobicST_bot
custom 52828786567655262138❤🔥3
15 реакций и я расскажу. ❌:;по машинам #тейк @tphobicST_bot
custom 53416450364193052175custom 54610875958847399523custom 54606480789964454032
загадка: кто такие моанатаны? ❌:; режиссёры моаны 🧉: пейринг моаны и китаны #тейк @tphobicST_bot
❤🔥6custom 52828786567655262132custom 54606480789964454032
➿ ⬜⬜🧪 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ﹫͟.MAMBA , search for friends online 🩲 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➡️➡️➡️ ПЕРЕХ0ДНИ4 | ВП | ОФОРМЛЕНИЕ | БОТ | ССЫЛКА 😉..*хочешь найти новые знакомства, похвастаться ахуенной анкетой, или просто быть участником этого проекта?* ➖ЕБЕ К НАМ!!! 🤍 🦷 dni: нету. мы крутые чюваки 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
❌:; я ща работаю в двух конфах одна ф*рсакен другая эта и они кароче так рядышком стоят Чё будет если я однажды при тфобном рт промахнусь #щп
custom 52828786567655262137😭2
«Хочешь пожаловаться на очередного тфем Мизуки беливера?» «Или поделиться хедканонами по секаю?» Добро пожаловать в TRANSPHOBIC SEKAI confession✨ 🎀Трансфобия– это негативное отношение к трансгендерным и транссексуальным людям • Вп-пост 🤩 • Зайти в кф 🤩
МНЕ ЗА СОЧИНЕНИЕ ПРО ОСД 5 ПОСТАВИЛИ ПОЗДРАВЬТЕ МЕНЯ 🗣️🗣️ ❌:; я учитель клянусь Неанон Сёмга #тейк @tphobicST_bot
🔥8
Почему мне Алексей напоминает Джона Шедлетского [разраб рб который был лютым инет троллем] лмао ❌:; бля а реально похож #тейк @tphobicST_bot
🙏7❤🔥1
❌:;
❤🔥4
#тейк @tphobicST_bot
custom 54610875958847399524custom 54606480789964454033❤🔥2
меня очень бесит нах, когда макс делают фтм 🤮🤮 то, что она не соответствует стереотипному женскому образу, не делает ее ебучим трансом #тейк @tphobicST_bot
custom 528287865676552621314
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tphobicST. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,364,596 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“transphobic stranger things cf” (@tphobicST), 48 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tphobicST.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.