Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 38 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 798–830 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 13:22
802
-3
7 Sept 2026, 15:18
805
-7
29 Aug 2026, 00:54
812
-4
21 Aug 2026, 16:23
816
-4
14 Aug 2026, 17:58
820
-5
8 Aug 2026, 02:11
825
-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:31
826
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:38
826
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
189 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
77
40.7%
🔥
39
20.6%
👍
35
18.5%
❤🔥
10
5.29%
custom 5271668865137407675
9
4.76%
🥰
8
4.23%
💯
5
2.65%
🙏
4
2.12%
👏
2
1.06%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Где брать силы, когда вокруг столько неопределенности?
Самое тяжелое в непростые периоды - даже не сами события. А ощущение, что жизнь будто поставлена на паузу. Не хочется развивать проект, принимать решения, строить планы. Кажется, что сначала должно «всё наладиться», а потом уже можно двигаться дальше.
Но проблема в том, что ожидание редко приносит чувство безопасности. Наоборот, чем дольше мы откладываем свою ж…
Я заметила одну закономерность
Чем сильнее женщина как эксперт, тем чаще она откладывает не мелкие задачи, а самые важные.
Не потому что ленивая.
Не потому что не знает, что делать. Наоборот, она уже многое умеет. У неё есть клиенты, опыт, результаты.
Но именно там, где начинается следующий уровень, что-то будто останавливает.
⬇️Не поднять стоимость. ⬇️Не выйти в новую роль. ⬇️Не заявить о себе громче. ⬇️Не сделат…
Есть такое?))
Я оплатила😁
И я к вам с новостями:
1️⃣ Я создала публичный канал в MAX (как выложу посты, я вас всех туда обязательно позову)
Не знаю что из этого выйдет. Канал в тг буду вести тоже, но преимущественно будут посты в MAX. Так как я ИП, я сделала публичный канал, а это значит, что меня смогут найти в поиске без отправления ссылок.
Я знаю, что у многих тг хорошо работает (но не у меня), и вряд ли его …
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Есть кто живой?👀
Проявите, пожалуйста, признаки жизни в виде реакций или коментов😂
Я отдохнула морально-эмоционально и соскучилась по вам, мои дорогие❤️
Давайте ниже немного пообщаемся👇🏻
Всегда ли все идет легко и по плану?
Конечно, нет, далеко не всегда)
Бывает ли периоды, когда не хочется ничего делать и приходит апатия и грусть?)
- конечно, бывают
В таких ситуациях очень важно просто быть, находиться. Не вытаскивать себя искусственно в сверх позитив.
Когда мы позволяем себе проживать негативные эмоции, то они действительно приживаются и проходят, а не застревают в нас.
Конец этого года пошел …
Погадаю вам на Новый год… но по-взрослому 😉
Да, да, именно так)
Все достаточно просто - только новые действия приводят к новым результатам
Если вы не будете делать что-то иначе (а желательно конечно в верной стратегии), то все останется также, как и было.
➡️Но чтобы делать новые (условно верные) действия, нужно новое состояние. Более взрослое, более «здоровое».
Например: девушка вышла из отношений, где муж ее ти…
❤6🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tovmasyan_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки женского психолога” (@tovmasyan_psy), 802 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tovmasyan_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.