Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

پژوهش گردی (دکتر ترابی)

@tourresearch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

146subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002784399238
TypeChannel
Username@tourresearch
Descriptionبه کانال پژوهش در گردشگری خوش آمدید. اینجا به بررسی نظام‌مند روش‌های تحقیق، تحلیل یافته‌های نوین و مباحث نظری در حوزه‌های مختلف گردشگری می‌پردازیم.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 11 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tourresearch

Growth

1467 August 2026 — 146 subscribers8 August 2026 — 146 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:00146no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:03146first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
122.6%
avg views ÷ 146 subscribers
Avg views / post
179
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 August 20253 August 2026)
Views total537
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

286 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏12343.0%
8028.0%
👍6422.4%
👌124.20%
💯31.05%
🙏31.05%
🎉10.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC79 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

10👍1

21 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC157 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📄 From Commons to Stewardship: Convergent Institutionalization in Community-Based Ecotourism پس از ماه‌ها تلاش و بازنگری، سرانجام در مجله Journal of Sustainable Tourism به چاپ رسید! ✅ این مجله جزو Q1 است و ضریب تأثیر آن ۸.۴ گزارش شده که در حوزه گردشگری، رتبه‌ای بسیار بالا محسوب می‌شود. 🌱 این پژوهش به بررسی گذار از مدیریت سنتی منابع به سمت رویکردهای امانتداری در اکوتوریسم جامعه‌محور می‌پردازد و امیدوارم بتواند گامی ه

11👏4

20 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC301 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://www.iana.ir/fa/tiny/news-136407

👏8👍32

30 Jun 2026, 07:00 UTC211 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

نخستین نشست تخصصی «عاملیت زنان روستایی و عشایری در توسعه ایران؛ از سیاست‌گذاری تا معماری آینده» روز دوشنبه ۸ تیر ۱۴۰۵ با همکاری مؤسسه پژوهش‌های برنامه‌ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی و مؤسسه آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی سازمان تات برگزار شد. در سخنرانی خود تأکید کردم که مسئله امروز زنان روستایی فقط «مشارکت بیشتر» نیست؛ بلکه گذار از مشارکت به عاملیت، اثرگذاری و رهبری محلی است. مشارکت زمانی به توسعه واقعی منجر می‌شود که

👏92

8 Jun 2026, 12:43 UTC240 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔴 سؤال پژوهش ما از اینجا آغاز شد: وقتی روستاهای گردشگری هم‌زمان با تحریم‌های اقتصادی و بحران افزایش هزینه زندگی روبه‌رو می‌شوند، چگونه بدون اتکا به منابع بیرونی پایدار می‌مانند؟ در این مطالعه، با بررسی ۵ روستای ایران و انجام ۷۵ مصاحبه عمیق، نشان دادیم که نوآوری در چنین شرایطی نه از وفور منابع، بلکه از فشار بقا شکل می‌گیرد. جوامع محلی، در مواجهه با کمبود، ناچار می‌شوند شیوه‌های تصمیم‌گیری، شبکه‌های تأمین منابع و یاد

👏122

3 Jun 2026, 21:49 UTC225 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

با شروع عصر هوش مصنوعی، سؤال عمده ما این بود که چگونه این فناوری‌ها می‌توانند تجربه‌های گردشگری روستایی را شکل دهند . مطالعه ما پاسخ داده است: 🔹 ۴ عامل کلیدی در خلق تجربه به‌یادماندنی با AI: دسترسی، اطلاعات‌رسانی، تعامل‌پذیری و شخصی‌سازی 🔸 پارادوکس «محدودیت دسترسی» : ارتباط ناپیوسته گاهی ارزش تجربه را بالاتر می‌برد! 🔹 نقش کلیدی «شایستگی کاربر» (User Competence) در تأثیرگذاری این عوامل 🎯 این پژوهش هم جنبه نظری و هم را

👍83

6 May 2026, 09:37 UTC250 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔻 پرسشی که ذهن ما را درگیر کرده بود: چرا با وجود قوانین و مداخلات متعدد، ناپایداری گردشگری روستایی کاهش نمی‌یابد و گاه تشدید می‌شود؟ این مسئله را در رساله دکتری خانم مرضیه علیپور، دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، گنجاندیم و نتایج آن اکنون در مقاله زیر پذیرفته شده است: 📄 Beyond Governance Failure: The Co-production of Rural Tourism Unsustainability in Iran's Alborz Highlands 📚 Jour

👏91

1 May 2026, 09:02 UTC228 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📢 پذیرش مقاله در Journal of Travel Research همیشه ذهن من را مشغول کرده بود که چطور مدل‌های رایج گردشگری هوشمند فرض می‌کنند رابطهٔ کاربر و فناوری امری پایدار و بدون مشکل است، در حالی که بسیاری از مسافران – به‌ویژه زنان مدام در حال چانه‌زنی با فناوری هستند. مقاله‌ام با عنوان: "Weaving Digital–Physical Realities: Conditional Empowerment in Women’s Smart Tourism" این پرسش را از منظر نظریهٔ برساخت‌گرای زمینه‌ای و بر

👏7👍3

27 Feb 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,060 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

یکی از سؤال‌های رایج دانشجویان این است که چرا ما در دانشگاه تکنسین تربیت نمی‌کنیم و اساساً نباید بکنیم؟ این اینفوگرافیک که ساخته ام دقیقاً برای پاسخ به همین پرسش طراحی شده است. دانشگاه قرار نیست شما را فقط برای اجرای ابزارها، نرم‌افزارها و روش‌های از پیش‌تعریف‌شده آماده کند؛ این کار، مأموریت آموزش‌های فنی و مهارتی است. مأموریت دانشگاه، تربیت انسانِ تحلیل‌گر است؛ کسی که منطق پشت روش‌ها را می‌فهمد، می‌تواند بپرسد «چر

👍7💯3👏1

27 Feb 2026, 08:16 UTC208 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

اولین مقاله بنده در میان مجلات زیر یک درصد فهرست JCR منتشر شد. حدود چهار ماه به‌طور فشرده روی این مقاله کار کردم و امیدوارم مطالعه آن برایتان مفید و لذت‌بخش باشد. 🙏 @tourresearch

👏104

10 Feb 2026, 09:39 UTC257 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @phdiranPhoto

کدام دانشگاه‌های ایران بیشترین پژوهشگران «یک درصد برتر جهان» را دارند؟ طبق جدیدترین آمارهای منتشر شده، سهم دانشگاه‌های وابسته به وزارت علوم از دانشمندان و پژوهشگران پر استناد ایرانی (یک درصد برتر دنیا) مشخص شد. این آمار نشان‌دهنده کیفیت و اثرگذاری بالای تولیدات علمی در این مراکز است. 🎓 رتبه‌بندی دانشگاه‌های برتر بر اساس تعداد پژوهشگر: 🥇 رتبه اول: دانشگاه تهران با ۵۲ پژوهشگر 🥈 رتبه دوم: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس با ۳۴ پژو

5👍3👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tourresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 339,814 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پژوهش گردی (دکتر ترابی)” (@tourresearch), 146 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tourresearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.