Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

here's to the fools who dream

@tothefoolswhodream

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

529subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002229985992
TypeChannel
Username@tothefoolswhodream
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tothefoolswhodream

Growth

528529528.56 August 2026 — 528 subscribers6 August 2026 — 528 subscribers13 August 2026 — 529 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 528–529 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:25529+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:31528no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:53528first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.0%
avg views ÷ 529 subscribers
Avg views / post
185
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held18 (20 May 202630 July 2026)
Views total370
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16856.4%
🔥5618.8%
😍3210.7%
💔124.03%
🕊124.03%
❤‍🔥103.36%
31.01%
🤔20.671%
🥴20.671%
💘10.336%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC149 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

сегодня будем смотреть и обсуждать киноальманах Джармуша Поговорим о том, как кофе в кинематографе обрастал разными символическими значениями. Обсудим конкретные примеры из культового альманаха Джармуша и разберемся, почему кофе помогает в сценах диалогов. билеты тут

143

27 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC221 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

*в среду пройдет новая лекция в «Капельке» Образ депрессии в кино Психолог и кинокритик о депрессии - от научных фактов до иллюстрации симптомов в кино. Поговорим о диагностике, разновидностях и факторах формирования заболевания в современном мире. Рассмотрим представленность депрессии в историческом и культурном контекстах. Как осознать, принять и справиться? Опыт депрессии как личное переживание на примере «Мела

9😍5🤔2

9 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC316 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🌧️ Эту картину часто описывают как опередившую свое время, что Марлен Хуциев снимал ее не для современников, а для потомков. Такие мысли возникают прежде всего потому, что фильм выглядит удивительно актуально. Правда, мне кажется, что к шестидесятым кинематограф уже достиг своей вершины, научившись разговаривать со зрителем на совершенно разных уровнях.

15🔥6

6 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC438 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ЗАКЛЮЧИТЕЛЬНАЯ ВСТРЕЧА КИНОКЛУБА 09.07.2026 19:00 Рождественская 36Д, Нижний Новгород, мастерская «Общение и искусство» фильм: Июльский дождь (1966) режиссер: Марлен Хуциев как проходит встреча? мини-лекция, просмотр фильма и дискуссия записываться мне в личные сообщения @serrazumovsky мест ограниченное количество цена 500 рублей 18+

💔126

24 Jun 2026, 13:59 UTC410 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🚖🚦 Взгляд Трэвиса Бикла — это та точка зрения, с которой зрителю приходится считаться, потому что Скорсезе нам не оставляет иного выбора. Проезжая по душным улицам ночного Нью-Йорка вместе с главным героем, режиссер незаметно, но очень эффективно погружает нас в безумный мир «Таксиста».

6😍1

22 Jun 2026, 14:38 UTC503 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ВСТРЕЧА КИНОКЛУБА 25.06.2026 19:00 Рождественская 36Д, Нижний Новгород, мастерская «Общение и искусство» фильм: Таксист (1976) режиссер: Мартин Скорсезе с русскими субтитрами как проходит встреча? мини-лекция, просмотр фильма и дискуссия записываться мне в личные сообщения @serrazumovsky мест ограниченное количество цена 500 рублей 18+

7🔥6🥴1

22 Jun 2026, 14:38 UTC288 viewsread 6 August 2026

И напоминаю, что уже в четверг встреча киноклуба! Запись ниже

22 Jun 2026, 07:42 UTC301 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

*«обсессия» и «закулисье реальности» 2/2 Как с завышенными ожиданиями я попал на «Обсессию», так с заниженными ожиданиями пошел на «Закулисье реальности». Может, этот фактор тоже имел значение, но о втором фильме есть что сказать в положительном ключе. Во-первых, спасибо, что автор оставил много места для интерпретации. Худшего конца и не придумать, если бы нам все разложили по полочкам.

17🕊4🔥2

22 Jun 2026, 07:42 UTC269 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

*«обсессия» и «закулисье реальности» 1/2 Сегодня не о теориях заговора, возрасте режиссеров, размерах бюджетов и прочих статистических фактах. А лишь о том, почему одно кино я считаю хорошим, а другое, на мой вкус, кажется банальным. За последнее время сложилась тенденция, что каждый год выходит громкий ужастик, запускающий волну обсуждений вокруг самого жанра, перерастающего статус B-mo

9🕊4

15 Jun 2026, 14:47 UTC304 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ctsentreVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥10❤‍🔥7

15 Jun 2026, 12:07 UTC343 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В этом месяце много событий, поэтому делюсь графиком мероприятий, на которых я буду выступать во второй половине июня: • 16 июня 16:20 - Городской образовательный фестиваль «Лимон». Лекция «Sad boy movies: как внутренний конфликт героя проникает в оптику зрителя». Буду говорить не столько о кино, сколько о том, как оно влияет на зрителя. Регистрация тут • 18 июня 19:00 - Обсуждение в кинотеатре «Империя Грез» в «

11😍5💘1🔥1🥴1

4 Jun 2026, 08:50 UTC400 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня смотрим «Таксиста» (1976) Скорсезе

10🔥1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tothefoolswhodream. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 96,598 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“here's to the fools who dream” (@tothefoolswhodream), 529 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tothefoolswhodream.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.