Channel
@totallyhusky
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
196subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001915443364 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @totallyhusky |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/totallyhusky |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 196 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 197 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 197 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
173 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 83 | 48.0% | |
| custom 5422715911385670090 | 44 | 25.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 5.20% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 4.62% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 4.62% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 2.89% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 2.89% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.73% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.578% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @totallyhusky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2025 to 1 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Наверное, это самый сложный текст, который мне приходилось писать за последнее время, но держать всё в себе больше нет сил. Последние месяца (или даже прошлый год) всё вокруг ощущается невероятно тяжелым. Состояние, когда хочется просто выключить весь мир, закрыться в темной комнате и забыть все. В голове крутится слишком много мыслей, и самая навязчивая, что это основная проблема. Когда внутри такая темнота, очен…
😢8❤1🤡1
🥳 Перевернул страницу, 23 — всё. 🤩 24 — это не просто новая цифра в паспорте, а этап, где хочется меньше суеты и больше качества во всем. 🤩 Мои 23 были похожи на очень странный плейлист, где после жесткого техно шел какой-то расслабленный джаз. Никакой логики, но чертовски атмосферно. 👋 Хочу сказать спасибо каждому, кто «подмешивал» в этот треклист свои песни. Тем, кто был рядом в самые шумные моменты и просто та…
🎉6😍2custom 54227159113856700902
Всех с наступающим 🎄 🐧 Этот год стал чередой испытаний и открытий — от смены декораций вокруг до крутых проектов. Он получился по-настоящему живым и наполненным. Спасибо всем причастным за общение и совместную работу. 👋 Верю, что в 2026-ом мы увидимся снова! Пусть этот наступающий год будет для вас и вашего окружения светлыми, спокойными и легкими на подъем
❤5🔥2
После почти трех лет активной работы в качестве организатора и администратора MLBB-турниров, я считаю необходимым высказать свое мнение, которое базируется на многолетнем опыте, а не на медийном влиянии. Так же, как и обращается к ребятам, которые на данный момент работают в сфере администрирования турниров. Ключевая мысль для каждого разумного человека проста: Информация из вторых рук не должна формировать оконч…
❤10
Вчерашний свадебный вайб словил Букет словил и отдал, спасибо 💐
❤6😍1
Что бы меня не поняли неправильно к посту выше: Это не значит, что кастеры плохие и тд. Мне всегда нравятся кастеры с которыми работаю на разных проектах, особенно последних, большинство и рекомендую к наему. В том посте более акцент к тому, что у каждого свои предпочтения в касте и для некоторых они значительные, а для некоторых в принципе без разницы.
❤1
По кастерам в принципе у меня была всегда только 1 претензия, но это относится не ко всем: - Подготовка к эфиру у некоторых отсутствует. В плане того, что ты нанял его, он пришел, сел, режиссёр подключил, а информации у него по турниру 0. Ну то есть, ты нанимаешь профессионала своего дела, а знания о патче, турнире и тд у него отсутствует и в итоге он пытается вывозить за счёт партнёра или просто разговорных тем, ко…
❤4🔥2
Спасибо Визеру за победу, сегодня меня больше ничего не удивит 🐻 Смотрим первую карту Big Season #3 Play-off у него
Девушки из МЛББ, вас ждёт небольшой сюрприз Скоро узнаете 🐻
custom 54227159113856700906👀5❤4
Я не публичный человек, но считаю важным придавать огласке подобные ситуации. Психологическое давление — уже форма насилия. Но когда оно перерастает в физическое, человек может дойти до состояния полного истощения и утраты чувства собственного достоинства. Именно такая ситуация произошла в данном случае, советую почитать у Гасана (Джуса) сообщения: https://t.me/juicemlbb/4394 Прошу всех быть внимательнее друг к д…
custom 54227159113856700905❤3🤨1
Обновился спустя 7 лет. Теперь я Пиксель 🐻
custom 542271591138567009010❤3
С первым днём лета 😶🌫️
❤11custom 54227159113856700902
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @totallyhusky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“База Полярного Хаски” (@totallyhusky), 196 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/totallyhusky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.