Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [🗝️] 𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐡𝐢 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐞 .

Channel

[🗝️] 𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐡𝐢 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐞 .

@toshibalism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

258subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001746398732
TypeChannel
Username@toshibalism
Created26 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/toshibalism

Growth

258259258.57 August 2026 — 259 subscribers8 August 2026 — 259 subscribers15 August 2026 — 258 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 258–259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:48258-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:15259no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:01259first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.4%
avg views ÷ 258 subscribers
Avg views / post
86.2
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (19 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,379
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3526.1%
💘2720.1%
🤩2216.4%
🍓139.70%
👾85.97%
🎃75.22%
🙏75.22%
💋64.48%
💯64.48%
💅32.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC36 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😒😱 .*•` — спустя время я наконец-таки смог нарисовать картинку для обложки своего большого розового скетчбука ❤️‍🩹 мне очень нравится палитра цветов и оформление! кажется, это теперь одна из моих любимых обложек, да ещё и с #джейбри🤩🤩🤩.

💘9💋2🍓1🎃1

4 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC47 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @shoudou_artPhoto

💙🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 💙Наконец заново открываю заказы. 💙Черно-белые скетчи: Хедшоты: 400р Пол-тела: 500р Полное тело: 700р 💙Цветные скетчи: Хедшоты: 500р Пол-тела: 700р Полное тело: 800р 💙Полноценные работы: Хедшоты: 1500р Пол-тела: 1700р Полное тело: 2000р 💙Другие условия: Оплата 50% заранее, 50% после. (Скетч — полная оплата) +100% с основной цены за дополнительного персонажа Фон: Цена договорная, мин

1

1 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC70 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#щп 🐏 дорогие мои, пожалуйста, напишите под этим постом, по каким ещё фандомам вы бы хотели увидеть у меня картинки???

🍓41🤩1

31 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC84 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#щп 🦇 ребятки, если тут есть те, кто умеет оформлять итабаги, можете, пожалуйста, подсказать какие-нибудь идеи по их оформлению? и, буду очень признателен, если у вас есть какие-нибудь ссылочки на хорошие сумочки с кармашками для значков и брелоков… я просто очень хочу сделать себе итабаг с разным мерчем с джейсоном, но я очень плохо разбираюсь в этом 🧻.

🤩75

30 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC86 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#щп 🌟 к слову, Бигби и есть тот самый третий персонаж, с которым у меня есть юмешипп ✍️

🍓4🤩21

30 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC84 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐶.*•` нарисовал своего любимого шерифа Бигби, хоть он и не совсем вышел рыженьким, как я планировал 🥨 … и, если бы вы только знали, как я радовался новости о анонсе второй части The Wolf Among Us, хе-хе 🎯.

💘8🤩74🎃4💅2

29 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC92 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

дорогие мои, простите за лишнюю болтовню тут на основе, мне немного одиноко и я хочу побыть болтушкой 🐇.

👾31🤩1

29 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC93 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

продолжаю рассуждения о моих юме… вот знаете, я всё ещё, спустя так много времени, в шоке с того, что мой юме в твистеде именно Маллеус 🌟 потому что ВТФ??? у меня всегда фаворитами и крашами были мужчины с вайбами типо волк-одиночка и с острым язычком — очевидно, моим крашем должен был бы быть Джек Хоул, но… почему-то я по уши втрескался в Маллеуса, который по факту мой кинн.

💘5🤩21👾1

29 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC88 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

… а ещё я прямо сейчас на природе, на отдыхе в Карелии 🐇 как-то спонтанно получилось, я этого даже не планировал, но я взял с собой всякие штуки для рисования, завтра попытаюсь сделать что-нибудь классное ИЛИ, по крайней мере, хотя бы нарисую скетчики.

👾41🤩1

29 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC88 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#щп 🌕 рубрика "странные полуночные вопросы от меня" открыта ✍️ дорогие мои, я просто хотел спросить у вас: как вы думаете, нормально ли иметь несколько юмешиппов? я вот задумался об этом совершенно случайно… просто у меня самого есть несколько юме, к примеру, с Маллеусом и ещё с одним персонажем, о котором я пока не буду говорить, но при этом есть основной (грубо говоря, самый главный и долгий) юмешипп с Джейсоном и

💯61

25 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC96 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

… постараюсь к понедельнику реабилитироваться 🩸

3🙏1

25 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC101 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#щп 💔 … и вы, наверное, ещё заметили, что я совсем в последнее время почти картинки не выкладываю, на меня тут навалилось много проблем (включая со здоровье) из-за чего мне пока тяжело рисовать и делать крутые штуки 🧻 но я в скором времени постараюсь что-нибудь крутое нарисовать или взять реквесты в своем щп или тут

🙏61

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @toshibalism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 113,120 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[🗝️] 𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐡𝐢 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐞 .” (@toshibalism), 258 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toshibalism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.