Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ТортУБТ

Channel

ТортУБТ

@tortubt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

821subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002926913222
TypeChannel
Username@tortubt
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tortubt

Growth

8218238227 August 2026 — 823 subscribers8 August 2026 — 823 subscribers16 August 2026 — 821 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 821–823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:25821-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:32823no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:34823first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2638.2%
👍1927.9%
710.3%
🥴34.41%
😢22.94%
😱22.94%
🤔22.94%
🤪22.94%
💊11.47%
🙈11.47%
🙉11.47%
🙊11.47%
🤣11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
44,904
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 16 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
24,900
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tortubt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 February 2026 to 12 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTC910 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Инстаграм, как и другие крупные площадки, просто упал, сдох, умер Уже 2 часа такая тема…

10 Jun 2026, 09:15 UTC889 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что происходит в ИНСТЕ? Если вы следите за другими источниками, то уже знаете, что TikTok и Reddit сейчас лежат мертвым грузом - сносы, теневые баны и жесткие ограничения накрыли очень многих. И вот вчера то же самое началось в Instagram: серьезные чистки, открутка подписчиков, сносы живых аккаунтов, проблемы с регистрацией - и все это буквально по щелчку. С чем это связано: Вчера Instagram выкатил довольно крупн

27 Apr 2026, 18:33 UTC≈1,260 views7 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что там сейчас 80 000 людей делают в офисе? Как будто, если будет 20 человек, особо ничего не поменяется, все равно тупая ИИшка все делает. Дошли до того, что ИИшки делают ИИшки, чтобы детектить ИИшки, спасибо роботы Meta планирует сократить около 8 тыс. сотрудников, это примерно каждый десятый, — BBC Причина — резкое усиление фокуса на искусственном интеллекте. Meta планирует вложить около $135 млрд в развитие ИИ.

👍3🤪2😱2

24 Apr 2026, 21:39 UTC≈1,060 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Проблемы с банами и штормом в последние 2 недели связанные в основном с новыми обновами инсты👇 Инстаграм начал активно ужесточать контроль над системой двухфакторной аутентификации (2FA) после всплеска злоупотреблений со стороны арбитражников и массовых заливов аккаунтов. По сути, прежняя модель 2FA «умерла» — её больше нельзя считать надежным инструментом защиты, так как она стала использоваться в схемах обхода огр

👍5😁4

30 Mar 2026, 23:31 UTC≈1,450 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока типочки до сих пор плачут и думают, что падение охватов и сносы это просто шторм, трафферы видно что уже привыкли к этой Инсте. А вообще, читать американский реддит полезно и познавательно для траффера они чучуть по другому мыслят и иногда сливают что то реально рабочее, поэтому иногда заглядываю в тематические сабреддиты 🤓GoProxy | чат | Щавель🥬 | ЛС

👍5

29 Mar 2026, 08:26 UTC≈1,150 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Кстати, у них в канале были неплохие советы о том, как выровнять и настроить ЦА. В целом там все по факту расписано. Можете посмотреть и применить https://t.me/mellstroytiktok/355

👍61

28 Mar 2026, 20:10 UTC≈1,240 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока Литвина и Меллстроя взломали и снесли в Инсте, мне пришла выплата. Но есть моментик из за того, что я «очернял своими словами репутацию Мелла», спустя 2 месяца мне урезали выплату на 80%, оказывается, если тебя просто так добавляют на проверку (без указания срока, у меня это заняло 3 месяца вне очереди) и ты пишешь, что модеры хуесосы, тебе режут выплату. Ну ладно, я лил моменты, где он просто раздевал девушек

5😁1

26 Mar 2026, 12:30 UTC963 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как может такое происходить в 2026.. В инсте как будто все работает рандомно, баны, взломы и в целом реки взломать литвина и заливать фотки меллстроя с 2020 это кнш жестко )

🥴31🤔1

10 Mar 2026, 17:19 UTC≈1,310 views2 reactions24,900 Starsread 8 August 2026

Ситуация в Иране наглядно показала, насколько сильно политические события влияют на алгоритмы и модерацию социальных сетей. Платформы практически мгновенно поджимают модерку, чтобы сдержать волну фейков, пропаганды и манипулятивных медиа. Социальные сети фактически ведут внутри своих платформ борьбу с информационной войной. Из за таких событий у всех трафферов происходят просадки, баны и другие проблемы. С одной ст

😢2

9 Mar 2026, 03:44 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ищу трафик с Threads📱 Кто умеет лить объемы на онлик пишите в ЛС (@Chech_mk). Что могу предложить: • Есть 12 моделей под пролив на данный момент (можно самостоятельно выбрать и протестировать каждую, найти оптимальную и конвертящую модель; большой выбор также позволяет масштабироваться). • Оплата за фри-фанов,первое время $1 за фана (позже, при объемах, обсудим более оптимальные условия). • Поддержка, помощь в зал

9 Mar 2026, 02:43 UTC≈1,070 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

InstAccountsManager сменили цену на подписку было 20$, стало 99$. Я, конечно понимаю, что инструмент достаточно хороший и рабочий, но менять цену в 5 раз просто так это жестко. У них там лимит на кол-во юзеров и кончились слоты и за наплыва информации о его работоспособности или что там? кто шарит 🤓GoProxy | чат | Щавель🥬

🤣1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @tortubt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 949,330 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТортУБТ” (@tortubt), 821 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tortubt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.