صباحيات كتابات مع كوب قهوة☕🖤.

Channel
ملك الياقوت والعقيق
@topazrubykingmlk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001455376990 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @topazrubykingmlk |
| Description | على العقيق اجتمعنا***نحن وسود العيون ما بال مجنون ليلى***قد جن بعض جنوني للتواصل عبر الواتس آب 701111060 حساب الانستقرام TopazRubyking الأيميل Fouadmotahar@gmail.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 14 March 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/topazrubykingmlk |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 51 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 51 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 March 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 86
- Links
- 54
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
مسلسل #اختطاف الحلقة ( 5 ) كاملة 😍🔥 ~> جودة عالية الدقة 1080p ✅ المشاهدة من هنا 👇 https://t.me/joinchat/SHpz8TSsaZnkh1eM
للحزينين فقط💔💔.
لـ مُحبين السطر الواحد,كتابات حزينة📜🖤.
كلينز لحماية المجموعات وتحميل المقاطع🎻🖤.
- المتنافس الثاني : فيصل🚩 للمزيد من المسابقات الأدبية يرجى الاشتراك 🔻 ( خاصة بنشر الشِعر والغزلْ♥️♥️.)
- المتنافس الثاني : فيصل🚩 للمزيد من المسابقات الأدبية يرجى الاشتراك 🔻 ( خاصة بنشر الشِعر والغزلْ♥️♥️.)
قروب بنات خمس دقايق واحذف💃🏻.
لـ مُحبين السطر الواحد,كتابات حزينة📜🖤.
» عبارات صباحيه لعشاق الصباح 🌻♥️.
لـ مُحبين السطر الواحد,كتابات حزينة📜🖤.
عندك انستا 🤔
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @topazrubykingmlk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 870,405 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@angell34 · 647 postsغــ ـزل عراقي 🙊💗'
@atth22 · 447 posts18 JULY
@besh401 · 417 postsضحيّه.
@Fiii8 · 1807 posts-'WATANE´-
@fofaa_2002 · 977 postsالاجىْ.
@illg10 · 357 posts𝑵𝑶𝑽𝑬𝑴𝑩𝑬𝑹 .
@irvx7 · 627 postsلوحيد قلبي🖤.
@lhlhhl71 · 1027 postsحرب إبريل.
@Mnale2 · 2957 postsاقــتٌبـاسـاتيء²².
@shosho2268 · 987 postsأنتظار
@vanilleIcecream · 307 postsزازي 𐂂.
@zxe0e · 327 postsوهَـن.
@gaah444 · 2395 postsزنـــــزانتي
@BenimHucre · 172 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@topazrubykingmlk named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ملك الياقوت والعقيق” (@topazrubykingmlk), 51 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/topazrubykingmlk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.