Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Top Data Sets

Channel

Top Data Sets

@top_data_sets

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002076674036
TypeChannel
Usernames@top_data_sets @topdatasets
Created17 December 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/top_data_sets

Growth

613 Aug 2026, 13:18 — 6 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 07:33 — 6 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 13:1814 Aug 2026, 07:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:336no change
13 Aug 2026, 13:186first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 17 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2023 to 26 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Feb 2026, 15:20 UTC56 viewsread 13 August 2026

°°••....••°° °°••....••°°°°••....••°° 🍨 @ 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾 🏙 @ 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗌 🪈 @ 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗐𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 💳 @ 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗒 🕳 @ 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖻𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗌 🥚 @ 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 🎵 @ 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 🧂 @ 𝗆𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗄 🍨 @ 𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗌𝖿𝗒𝗂𝗇𝗀 🧬 @ 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗎𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗌 🤿 @ 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗅𝗌 🏝️ @ 𝗁𝗈𝗉𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖿𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗌 🪈 @ 𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖼𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗌 🥛 @ 𝖺𝗉𝗉 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗂𝗋𝖾 👣 @ 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗒𝗉𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗉𝗌 ⚓️ @ 𝗍𝗈𝗉 𝗀 𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗃𝗂𝗌 🐝 @ 𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗀𝗅𝗒𝗉𝗁𝗌 🐠 @ 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗍

19 Dec 2023, 02:39 UTC255 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

▐░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▌ ✔️ @topdatasets ▐░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▌ 🧬✅⚡️💎✅💎 👑🧬⚡️💎 °°••....••°° °°••....••°°°°••....••°°

❤1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @top_data_sets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,114,479 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

The Internet That Works ©️
@the_internet_that_works · 32 posts

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

App Escritoire
@app_escritoire · 21 postCalypso Clips
@calypso_clips · 11 postForm Follows Function
@form_follows_function · 11 postHopping Fonts
@hopping_fonts · 1,8581 postKinetic Kraft
@kinetic_kraft · 31 postLifted Glyphs
@lifted_glyphs · 21 postMakes You Think
@makes_you_think · 101 postOnyx Tonic
@onyx_tonic · 11 postOpinions Are Not Facts
@opinions_are_not_facts · 21 postReal Deal Reels
@realdealreels · 31 postRE : Transformative
@retransformative · 11 postSnes 8X
@snes8x · 771 postSource Originators
@sourceoriginators · 41 postThe Names of The Game
@the_names_of_the_game · 121 postTop G Emojis
@top_g_emojis · 21 postTrue Instruments
@true_instruments · 171 postTube Treasures
@tube_treasures · 11 postUltra Satisfying
@ultra_satisfying · 21 postValuable Ideas
@valuable_ideas · 21 postWho Has The Money
@who_has_the_money · 21 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Top Data Sets” (@top_data_sets), 6 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/top_data_sets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.