Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لنَفسي

Channel

لنَفسي

@tooo_sara

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

124subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002100024598
TypeChannel
Username@tooo_sara
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tooo_sara

Growth

123124123.528 August 2026 — 123 subscribers28 August 2026 — 123 subscribers14 September 2026 — 124 subscribers28 August 202614 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123–124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 11:16124+1
28 Aug 2026, 12:42123no change
28 Aug 2026, 02:15123first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 124 subscribers
Avg views / post
21.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total42
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 15 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52896702799607628521410.9%
custom 52966840002098227371410.9%
custom 52897493460136978831310.1%
custom 5293983582472135373129.30%
custom 5294430336380330453129.30%
custom 520445263983989983386.20%
custom 530093437715534756986.20%
custom 522472132494914667164.65%
custom 528538865712813649464.65%
custom 536416688714182976664.65%
custom 527398191118471114753.88%
custom 531883020879765458553.88%
custom 527156955260859991143.10%
custom 520428082826315611332.33%
custom 527195965589816088432.33%
custom 527157387334569960721.55%
custom 531027765760099885121.55%
custom 534598773368687067221.55%
custom 534626315275969125721.55%
custom 534610152025544248410.775%
1 further kind10.775%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tooo_sara. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC21 viewsread 28 August 2026

لو كان حبك للنبيّ صادقا لأطَعتهُ .. إن المُحب لمن يحب مطيـع.. "عيدان يا أمةَ محمدٍ لا ثالث لهما"

20 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC55 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

اللهم اهدِنا فيمن هديت، وعافِنا فيمن عافيت، وتولَّنا فيمن توليت، وبارك لنا فيما أعطيت، وقِنا واصرف عنا شرَّ ما قضيت، فإنك تقضي ولا يُقضى عليك، إنه لا يذل من واليت، تباركت ربنا وتعاليت.⭐

custom 52739819111847111475custom 52715695526085999114custom 52719596558981608843custom 52715738733456996072

19 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC62 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

‏- سُبحان الله ‏- الحمدلله ‏- لا إله إلا الله ‏- االله اكبر ‏- سُبحان الله و بحمده🌟 ‏- سُبحان الله العظيم ‏- استغفِرُ الله و أتوبُ إليه ‏- لا حول و لا قوة إلا بالله ‏- اللهم صلِ وسلم على نبينا محمد ‏- لا إله إلا الله محمد رسول الله ..🌻

custom 52897493460136978832custom 53459877336868706722custom 53462631527596912572custom 53461015202554424841custom 53463229387044543011

18 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC72 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52939835824721353731

18 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC73 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026

﴿تُسَبِّحُ لَهُ السَّمَاوَاتُ السَّبْعُ وَالْأَرْضُ وَمَن فِيهِنَّ وَإِن مِّن شَيْءٍ إِلَّا يُسَبِّحُ بِحَمْدِهِ وَلَكِن لَّا تَفْقَهُونَ تَسْبِيحَهُمْ إِنَّهُ كَانَ حَلِيمًا غَفُورًا﴾.🦋 «سُبْحَانَ اللهِ وَبِحَمْدِهِ عَدَدَ خَلْقِهِ ، سُبْحَانَ اللهِ وَبِحَمْدِهِ رِضَا نَفْسِهِ ، سُبْحَانَ اللهِ وَبِحَمْدِهِ زِنَةَ عَرْشِهِ ، سُبْحَانَ اللهِ وَبِحَمْدِهِ مِدَادَ كَلِمَاتِهِ».🦋

custom 52896702799607628522custom 52939835824721353732custom 52944303363803304532custom 52966840002098227372custom 52247213249491466711custom 52853886571281364941custom 52897493460136978831custom 53641668871418297661

18 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52939835824721353732

18 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC69 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

يَا حَيُّ يَا قَيُّوْمُ بِرَحْمَتِكَ أَسْتَغِيْثُ ، أَصْلِحْ لِي شَأْنِي كُلَّهُ ، وَلا تَكِلْنِي إِلَى نَفْسِي طَرْفَةَ عَيْن 🦋.

custom 52896702799607628523custom 52944303363803304533custom 52247213249491466711custom 52853886571281364941custom 52939835824721353731custom 52966840002098227371custom 53641668871418297661

15 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ll5UD

- السلام عليكم ، توجيه جديد تبادل نشر وجه المنشور لقناتك ونعطيك شهادة شكر وتقييم لمحتوى قناتك كذلك من 20 نشر العلم النافع ولو قناتك فيها ذنوب نصيحة ما توجه المنشور . للإشتراك : @I8YE8

custom 52896702799607628523

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tooo_sara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مجرة الأنمي - Anime Galaxy
@Anime1Galaxy · 44,072
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 28 August 2026
صمت
@Samt_00 · 24,291
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
سراب
@Syria_a9 · 24,601
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لنَفسي” (@tooo_sara), 124 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tooo_sara.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.