Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TON Turbo PPP

Channel

TON Turbo PPP

@tonturbo_ppp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002225387441
TypeChannel
Username@tonturbo_ppp
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 15 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tonturbo_ppp

Growth

1001021018 August 2026 — 102 subscribers9 August 2026 — 102 subscribers16 August 2026 — 100 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:15100-2
9 Aug 2026, 10:01102no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:17102first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6031.6%
🔥5730.0%
👍4322.6%
178.95%
💯73.68%
👏42.11%
👎10.526%
💩10.526%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2024 to 14 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2024, 14:12 UTC793 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

We’re thrilled to introduce our incredible partners who will be with us as we embark on this exciting journey. Their support, combined with your enthusiasm, will fuel our success. REDUCK is more than just a community; it’s a powerful network backed by strong support and big opportunities. Remember, every holder is a key part of this project’s future—you are not just a participant; you are part of our strong communi

10🔥5👍3👎1💩1

27 Aug 2024, 19:30 UTC741 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Today we dropped hard after tokens got unlocked for next reason: 1 guy, who’s name is Damson(you can find him as admin in TCat chat, he is ghost) bought tokens at gaspump since beginning and told us(team) he will NEVER sell and no need to worry about him at all, we trusted him because he is admin of TCat group, we were building a lot, and once he sold his 5% supply at the beginning of August and we dropped from 120k

15🔥7👍5

26 Aug 2024, 09:06 UTC573 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

In collaboration with #Freedom token Join us today as we spread #Freedom with an AMA with #FREEDOM Guest: @MrSatoshik Set your reminders ⏱️🔔 19:00 UTC https://x.com/i/spaces/1RDxlybZXmoKL

5🔥5

25 Aug 2024, 22:12 UTC495 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

TBO 🤝 FREEDOM We are excited to announce a new partnership: the FREEDOM project, which supports freedom of speech, has just launched with GasPump and is already showing excellent results. Welcome, FREEDOM! Telegram X

🔥93

25 Aug 2024, 06:02 UTC412 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Good morning! 🌞 Hope you have a fantastic Sunday! 🏖️

62

23 Aug 2024, 05:35 UTC421 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Dear Friends, 🌟 Our bot will be ready in the coming days. 🚀 In the meantime, let us know what kind of bot you think we’re working on! 🤔🤖

🔥6

22 Aug 2024, 20:55 UTC426 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ Important Notice: Beware of Fake $TBO Tokens ⚠️ Recently, there have been many fake $TBO tokens attempting to deceive users by redirecting them to this Telegram. The image below shows our authentic token. 🔍 Please verify the following details: - CA (Contract Address): EQBA-eB6kNVH89ATz6CXjP1sdhfAdx_U6zy-foDuWVy85DdH - FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation): Ensure it matches the market capitalization. 🚨 Stay vigilant a

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonturbo_ppp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,168,312 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TON Turbo PPP” (@tonturbo_ppp), 100 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonturbo_ppp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.