Posted without readable text
custom 52535713633057248608custom 52537388799151708196custom 52560674307944363973

Channel
@tonpfpepe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
112subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003967836515 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonpfpepe |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 1 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonpfpepe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 112 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 119 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 119 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
107 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5255846639410650242 | 23 | 21.5% | |
| custom 5255966258544809988 | 22 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5255840295743954416 | 17 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5253738879915170819 | 14 | 13.1% | |
| custom 5256068465881551813 | 13 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5253571363305724860 | 11 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5256067430794436397 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| custom 5253627885075341242 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| custom 5253750940183340765 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| custom 5253920819024796919 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.935% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
custom 52535713633057248608custom 52537388799151708196custom 52560674307944363973
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
custom 52559662585448099885custom 52558466394106502423custom 52539208190247969191
Dear pensioners, Level 1 is over and the snapshot has been taken! Expect updates soon — we’ll let you know how Joker token holdings changed after the first round. In Level 2, both Joker and pfp tokens will be involved. If you didn’t make it in time — don’t worry! You still have a chance to grow your bag by buying more JOKER or pfp tokens! Nothing happens for no reason, my fellow retirees! We’re on the verge of list…
custom 52558466394106502424custom 52537388799151708192custom 52535713633057248601
⏰ Guys, it’s Old Pepe talking. I’m under no one’s influence — you can trust these frog eyes! But time for Level 1 is almost up — just 2 hours left to buy JOKER and grab some tokens from the PEPE pension fund. Heads up: if yesterday 1,000,000 pfp cost 225 TON (including commission), today it’s already 286 TON! Don’t wait, the conditions are changing, and not in your favor. At 17:00 MSK (14:00 UTC) we’ll take a snaps…
custom 52558466394106502421
How to join @JokerEva: 1. Verify your wallet through @Murzitonbot. 2. Hold at least 50,000 JOKER tokens in your wallet. - You can buy JOKER with zero fees here: t.me/murket/GIFTS - Or, get them on the 🟧 dedust (10% fee). To buy on the exchange, just connect your wallet and find JOKER using this contract: 🎁 JOKER / 🦅 chart / 🟧 buy EQB9kCdX9aQ2XCAC_nl0nyySVAeXJRtTRuP5zcQvrTbOpqz- 3. Once you have enough tokens, th…
🧱 Giveaway Finished 🧱 Total tickets: 25 Winners list: 1. Jester Hat #78141 - @CrazyCat13 2. Jester Hat #66054 - @maksi_ton 3. Jester Hat #34168 - @anasta59
Alright, my dear pensioners and random passersby! This is your very calm Grandpa Pepe speaking—I'm doing this myself, no one is forcing me, I act purely of my own old free will. Here's the deal: JOKER token holders will soon receive payments from the Pepe pension fund — that's 1,000,000 pfp tokens up for grabs! All this happiness will be shared among those who hold between 10,000 and 666,999 JOKER. Want to outplay o…
custom 52558402957439544164custom 52558466394106502423custom 52559662585448099883custom 52560684658815518131
Explaining simply, from Grandpa Pepe: Want to get into @TheRabbitsLair? 1. Confirm your wallet in @Murzitonbot. 2. To enter the first level, choose one of two options: 😎 Hold 10,000 JOKER in your wallet OR ❤️ Have a Telegram profile gift: 3 Jester Hats (any model) or 3 Red Lobsters (instant ramen). That’s it! Confirm your wallet, meet one of the conditions — and you’re in the rabbit’s lair. Please do not invest in…
custom 52537388799151708192custom 52558466394106502421
🧱 Giveaway Finished 🧱 Total tickets: 30 Winners list: 1. Jester Hat #67696 - @Funpeas
Oh, here they are—my favorite surviving pensioners, who absolutely hate moving… I kept explaining to these old scatterbrains: we’ve got some rowdy retirees on our hands, tormenting our pigeons! So I had to officially relocate our PEPE pension fund, and the move itself cost us a whopping 6,000,000 freshly minted PFP tokens: https://tonviewer.com/EQAKce4-Eu0KGDd3u3rkgZlwZS6iRIfSw8FqKCf3NWou0Gw2 Even one particularly i…
custom 52558466394106502423custom 52535713633057248602
Oh, my dear feeble pensioners, some of the folks in our Pepe fund turned into real troublemakers — they were stealing bread from the pigeons, making sudden movements, neglecting their blood pressure, skipping their meds, and someone even jumped on a treadmill and nearly took off! So, I, old Pepe, had to close that fund and open a fresher, new one. As for those crafty seniors — some needed a straitjacket, some had to …
custom 52537388799151708194
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tonpfpepe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 72,875 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“pfp — pension fund pepe” (@tonpfpepe), 112 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonpfpepe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.