π @Karna Google Index: ~300 Million πππ fragment.com/username/karna #Karna π en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karna π‘ @TONLand
π3

Channel
@tonland
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
585subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001443161079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @gloria @hotnames @tonland @usercollection |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonland |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 585 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 583 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 583 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 582 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 583 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 583 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 583 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 December 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
30 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 26 | 86.7% | |
| π | 3 | 10.0% | |
| π₯ | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π @Karna Google Index: ~300 Million πππ fragment.com/username/karna #Karna π en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karna π‘ @TONLand
π3
The Endππ±πΉ
π @Johnson Google Index: ~ 1 Billion π₯ #Auction Started at 8 TON π π₯ Next Bid: 9 π πππ fragment.com/username/johnson #Johnson πΉ Johnson Surname 173rd Most Common surname in the World Approximately 3,080,776 people bear this surname Most prevalent in: United States πΊπΈ Highest density in: Bahamas π forebears.io/surnames/johnson πΉ Johnson Forename 2,193rd Most Common name in the World Approximately 462,827 people bβ¦
π @Andra Google Index: ~ 300 Million πππ fragment.com/username/andra #Andra π·π΄ Romanian Singer π Andra.ro π facebook.com/andra (~4M) πΈ instagram.com/andra (~2.8M) π€ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andra_(singer) π«π· andra.fr βοΈ sonnenschutz-andra.de πΆ andrametal.de π¨ hotelandra.de ποΈ andrashop.de πΆ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andra_Day π©βπ€ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andra_Martin π΅ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andra_Soni πΌ en.wikipedia.org/wiβ¦
β€1
π TON Land π₯ pinned a photo
π TON MAP Conquer the Telegram Map! Buy pixels and expand your Domain. πππ https://t.me/TheTonMapBot?startapp=f6084bdf0a3bb π‘ @TONLand
π @Hayat (ΨΩΩΩΨ§Ψ©~Life) πππ fragment.com/username/hayat #Hayat Hayat Surname 745th Most Common surname in the World Approximately 714,052 people bear this surname π forebears.io/surnames/hayat Hayat Forename 1,850th Most Common name in the World Approximately 539,735 people bear this name π forebears.io/forenames/hayat π‘ @TONLand
π TON Land π₯ pinned a photo
π @Anarchist πππ fragment.com/username/anarchist #Anarchist #Anarchism Anarchism is not chaos. It is the belief that people can organize their lives through freedom, voluntary cooperation, mutual aid, and personal responsibility-without the need for rulers or coercive authority. Order through consent, not domination. π en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism π‘ @TONLand
β€1
Channel name was changed to Β«π TON Land π₯Β»
Channel photo updated
π @Michel π₯ Auction Started at 4 TON π β³ Just 24 Hours πππ fragment.com/username/michel Google Index: ~350 Million πΉ Michel Forename 234th Most Common name in the World Approximately 2,410,634 people bear this name Most prevalent in: France π«π· Highest density in: France π«π· π forebears.io/forenames/michel πΉ Michel Surname 1,166th Most Common surname in the World Approximately 458,046 people bear this surname Mβ¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonland. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 123,712 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 44 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tonland named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ TON Land π₯β (@tonland), 585 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonland.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.