Channel
@toniccx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,142subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001727744602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @toniccx |
| Created | 6 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/toniccx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 1,142 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 1,145 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 1,150 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:10 | 1,150 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Announcing Tonic Docs & Introduction to Fift. The threshold for starting to build on TON is quite high, plus a lack of learning materials and guides makes it spooky for the curious newcomers. Since Tonic's original idea is to simplify all of it, we've been working on a new Tonic rollout: the Tonic Docs library. Designed to come in handy in every TON dev's routine, Tonic Docs are a list of introductory documents and…
TonicAsk: TVM Dev We asked several questions a TVM developer known as Purple. He contributed to the minter contract modifications we wrote about yesterday, and has a wider field of view at TON dev community. How come you're a TVM developer? Did you work with other blockchains before laying your finger on TON? I met Roman (founder of @bitoneng) in a chat and he offered me a job. At the time, I didn't even know wha…
Make Jetton Great Teams start playing around with the jetton minter contract. Dropped by the core devs earlier this month, some folks decided to customize it a bit. For example, the @bitoneng team introduced a series of improvements to the source code (made available on GitHub). Among these: - the STR (send to receive) mechanism that enables users to simply send $TON and receive jettons in return instantly; - with…
The Arrival of Jettons Multiple projects are up for launching their custom tokens on TON – the jettons. It's not an easy task due to the lack of infrastructure around, but TON builders keep proving nothing is impossible. Scaleton is a TON wallet with a focus on jettons. This newly-born product has already become the stronghold of some devs working with jetton smart contracts: it's fairly easy to add your jetton to …
Jettons Ahead of Wallets Despite the fact jettons are already possible to implement, it's not been an easy task due to the lack of infrastructure: one can deploy a jetton contract and send it, yet the receivers have no way to see their jetton balances nor send it out (unless you're a dev). However, the TON community always finds a way. Recently, the first jetton found its way to the mainnet. More to that, the issui…
TON vs Alternatives L1 blockchains existed long before TON stepped into the market. Even though they're less relevant today in terms of functionality and capabilities, many devs keep building on top of Solana or Ethereum, for example. Original TON designers took into account the fact there are other chains that are not easy to compete with. And did their best to architect The Open Network (back then thought of as '…
1 Billion USD Two weeks ago, channel of TON posted an address for community donations – with an idea to create a bigger reserve of Toncoin. It would enable Foundation to develop the ecosystem harder, and reach new heights. Starting next day, the donations address exploded with incoming transactions. It reached hundreds of millions USD in $TON equivalent – all being non-profit donations. Today the amount of Toncoin …
TonicAsk: BITON NFTs have long been the hottest topic in TON space. Devs had to think hard when working with smart contracts – for the sake of creating awesome products we seen on the shelves of TON Apps today. In Q1 alone, BITON developed one of a few functional TON NFT marketplaces, built an involved community with 15K subscribers on its channel in Russian, and started the game in other TON directions. Today BITO…
Telegram Web Apps In the latest Telegram update that was published under an hour ago, the team announced web bots as 'Web Apps for Bots' – among with web app design guidelines, implementation instructions, as well as other useful notes. Worth taking a look at: https://core.telegram.org/bots/webapps The concept was titled 'Bot Revolution' and we already know a few TON teams that kick off with active development in …
TonicAsk: TelePay We're launching a new format called TonicAsk. In order to shed lights on recent on-TON developments, our writers will reach out to various projects within Tonic community. With exactly 5 questions to answer, teams will have an opportunity to tell about amazing things they've built – to the worldwide audience of Tonic devs. Let's begin with @telepaycash – the first Toncoin payment gateway. TelePay …
Sunsetting TonicMatch Months ago we launched TonicMatch. It was a board where TON enthusiasts could find people they need – to build on The Open Network, together. We soon realized that as TON ecosystem grows, a board doesn't quite fit our needs. That's why, today, we are replacing the web version of TonicMatch with a 'Match' channel on our Discord. From now on, whether you're a dev, a founder, or a project seeki…
Channel name was changed to «Tonic – Building on TON. Together. 💎»
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @toniccx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 366,788 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@toniccx named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tonic – Building on TON. Together. 💎” (@toniccx), 1,142 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toniccx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.