Channel

OpenGifts News

@tongiftsnews

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

634,581subscribers

-5,969 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002070163666
Type	Channel
Username	@tongiftsnews
Description	CLAIM YOUR $TON/USDT/BTC 💵💰🎁💎 EVERYDAY HERE! 🎁Open, gift, and connect everyone in the Web3 world!🔗🌏 👉GIFT BOT: @GetTonGifts_Bot 👉Chat: @TonGiftsChat1 👉CS : @CSTonGifts
Created	Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 August 2026
Measurements held	8
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/tongiftsnews

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5,969. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 633,686–641,445 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:35	634,581	-983
11 Aug 2026, 13:12	635,564	-1,147
10 Aug 2026, 14:31	636,711	-794
9 Aug 2026, 15:12	637,505	-884
8 Aug 2026, 15:21	638,389	-918
7 Aug 2026, 16:23	639,307	-848
6 Aug 2026, 18:20	640,155	-395
6 Aug 2026, 00:41	640,550	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 303
Videos: 2
Links: 504

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

11,649 reactions across 20 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	2,264	19.4%
🔥	2,200	18.9%
👍	2,167	18.6%
🎉	2,121	18.2%
😁	1,900	16.3%
👏	341	2.93%
🥰	313	2.69%
🤩	300	2.58%
🤔	5	0.043%
💯	4	0.034%
🤝	4	0.034%
⚡	3	0.026%
💅	3	0.026%
🤡	3	0.026%
👌	2	0.017%
😱	2	0.017%
🤯	2	0.017%
🆒	1	0.009%
🌭	1	0.009%
🍾	1	0.009%
12 further kinds	12	0.103%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,649reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 10 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Feb 2026, 10:15 UTC≈14,200 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

💬 Do you trust campaigns more when rewards are auditable and real? Let’s be honest — trust decides whether users participate or walk away. 🔍 Would you join more Web3 campaigns if rewards were: ✔️ On-chain ✔️ Fully transparent ✔️ Provably verifiable Yes or No — tell us why in the comments 👇 🧠 In Web3, trust isn’t optional — it’s infrastructure. 📈 Transparent rewards don’t just build confidence — they scale communi…

❤23👍7🥰5🔥3🍾1💅1🙈1

9 Feb 2026, 05:38 UTC≈16,700 views571 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

🏛 Project Review | DAO Participation Low voter turnout is a common DAO problem — governance exists, but users don’t engage. OpenGifts transformed passive governance into a progressive reward journey: 📖 Read proposals → 🗳 Vote → 🤝 Delegate → 🎁 Earn rewards 📊 Impact delivered: • Voter participation increased by 180% • Proposal discussions became deeper and more meaningful • Delegation activity and long-term involveme…

❤134😁114🔥110👍107🎉105🕊1

6 Feb 2026, 12:25 UTC≈14,800 views539 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

Why Users Feel OpenGifts Is Different ✨ Users can feel good design. One thing stands out in OpenGifts campaigns: Users say they feel comfortable. Why? Because we remove: ❌ Cognitive overload ❌ Trust anxiety No complex wallets upfront. No chain-switch confusion. No unclear transactions. Instead: 📲 Social actions first 🎁 Rewards second 🔗 On-chain later By the time users touch Web3, they already trust the flow. Th…

😁121🔥109❤107👍104🎉97💘1

4 Feb 2026, 05:04 UTC≈18,600 views488 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

🔥 Web3 Reality Check — Be Honest 😤 Which type of Web3 campaign do you hate the most? Let’s call out the bad UX that kills growth 👇 A) Too many complicated steps 🧩 B) Hidden rules and unclear conditions 🕵️ C) Rewards that take forever to arrive ⏳ D) No real value or utility at all 🚫 💬 Vote and share your thoughts 📉 Bad experience = lost users 📈 Better UX = real growth Your feedback helps shape smarter, fairer Web3…

🔥123👍100😁93🎉86❤84👏1😱1

2 Feb 2026, 09:47 UTC≈18,200 views651 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

⚙️ Project Review | L2 Ecosystem Growth An L2 network rolled out major upgrades — but most users barely noticed. So OpenGifts turned boring release notes into an interactive journey: Learn → Test → Claim → Share 🚀 📊 Impact Results 🔥 22,000+ test transactions 👛 9,500+ new wallets created 💬 Developer community engagement surged 🎯 Instead of passive reading, users learned by doing 🎁 Education became rewarding 🔁 Part…

😁144❤134👍128🎉123🔥120⚡1😎1

30 Jan 2026, 08:35 UTC≈18,800 views542 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

💡 Growth without revenue is just vanity. Partners often ask: “Can OpenGifts bring value beyond user numbers?” The answer is yes — because our tasks reflect real intent. Instead of empty actions: ❌ Like & leave ❌ Join & disappear Partners design tasks around real usage: 🎮 Try a feature 🧪 Test a product 🗳 Participate or vote 🎁 Rewards are small but meaningful ⚡️ Friction stays low 🔁 Behavior becomes repeatable Ove…

❤92🎉90👍82🥰75👏73🔥69🤩60👌1

29 Jan 2026, 06:38 UTC≈17,300 views554 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

🧠 Memory Test — What makes a project unforgettable? Not all rewards create memories. Some just disappear. Others stick emotionally — and keep users coming back 💭💖 Which reward makes a project truly memorable for you? A) Your first on-chain asset ⛓️ B) An exclusive badge 🏅 C) A small but instant reward ⚡️ D) Community-only perks 👥 Vote + tell us why 👇 Because emotion drives retention — not just incentives 🚀 🧧Join…

🎉133😁111👍106🔥102❤101🦄1

28 Jan 2026, 03:02 UTC≈18,300 views658 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

Project Review | SocialFi Engagement A SocialFi app struggled with inflated metrics caused by task farming and low-quality interactions. Clicks were high, but trust was missing. 🎁 OpenGifts redesigned the reward logic around real social proof: Post → Reply → Get Verified → Unlock 📊 Results: 🤖 Bot activity ↓ 41% 💬 Genuine conversations ↑ 3× 🌱 Creator retention improved 💡 Key insight: SocialFi grows through trust, …

😁151🎉138❤133🔥120👍114🤝1🤪1

27 Jan 2026, 01:37 UTC≈17,200 views425 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

📲✨ Where Should Web3 Rewards Live? ✨📲 Rewards shouldn’t feel forced. They should feel natural — right where users already are 👀💡 So we’re curious 👇 Where do you prefer to claim Web3 rewards most naturally? 🐦 X 💬 Telegram 🎮 In-game 🧩 Web mini-app The best rewards don’t interrupt the experience. They blend into it 🎁✨ Reply with your choice below 👇 Because rewards should feel native, not bolted on 🚀 🧧Join us to le…

🔥97😁85❤84🎉81👍76💅1🤔1

26 Jan 2026, 06:03 UTC≈18,400 views622 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

🚀 Let’s be honest. Web3 isn’t short on tech or ideas — it struggles with sustainable user growth. Most projects still depend on: 🪂 Short-term airdrops 📉 One-off campaigns 🗯 Noise without retention OpenGifts was built to break this cycle. We don’t chase clicks. We build distribution: 🎁 Task-based social gifting 🎯 Rewards for real behavior 🔗 Turning Web2 actions into Web3 ownership User journey: Follow → Join → Int…

👍137❤126🔥122🎉117😁116🤝2⚡1💅1

23 Jan 2026, 07:35 UTC≈17,000 views610 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

🌐🚀 Growth Doesn’t Live on Just One Platform 🚀🌐 Growth isn’t about choosing a single channel — it’s about meeting users wherever they are 👥✨ What if engagement could flow freely across platforms? 🤔 Across Telegram, X, Discord — and beyond 🔗 At OpenGifts, we break down platform walls 🧱❌ By unifying 🎁 gifting 🎉 rewards 🔍 verification into one seamless experience ⚙️✨ Because real growth doesn’t happen in isolation. I…

🔥132👍123❤120😁120🎉112⚡1👏1🤝1

22 Jan 2026, 06:37 UTC≈20,300 views643 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

🎮📚 GameFi | Turning Trial Users into On-Chain Players 🎯 Project Review: GameFi Onboarding A GameFi studio faced a common problem: Web2 gamers loved the gameplay — but dropped off before wallet setup 😵💨 To fix this, OpenGifts redesigned onboarding around incentives 🎁 Instead of forcing wallets first, we flipped the flow: ▶️ Play → Win → Claim → Bind Wallet 📊 The impact: 👥 11,600 players successfully completed wa…

🔥140❤134😁132🎉117👍113🥰4🏆1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tongiftsnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 56,350 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

AKEDO News
@akedofun · 1,423,0194 posts FractionAI
@fractionai · 1282 posts ABS Channel
@abs_ann · 13,8301 post Gang 420
@Gang42027jun · 101 post Bot Legit 2
@heroikzreee · 1741 post SquidTG Announcement
@squid_tg_announcement · 35,0391 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Banana TV
@bananatvchannel · 33,9734 posts Lepasa Announcement
@lepasaorg · 17,4524 posts AIRDROP FINDER 365
@AirdropFinder365 · 291 post Free Airdrop channel
@airdropofficial1400channel · 211 post Aveai Offical
@aveai_offical · 6921 post Gram of TON
@gram · 7,033,2221 post Ponchiqs Community
@ponchiqs · 1,824,4161 post 톤코리아 채널
@tonkoreaorg_channel · 1151 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

OpenGifts Chat1
@tongiftschat0 · 56,59519 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

opengifts.io19 posts · 12 January 2026 – 10 February 2026 · example post

x.com19 posts · 12 January 2026 – 10 February 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OpenGifts News” (@tongiftsnews), 634,581 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tongiftsnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.