2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 229–231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Oct 2026, 18:22
230
no change
2 Oct 2026, 17:47
230
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 230 subscribers
Avg views / post
48.0
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
17 (26 May 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
384
Reactions total
42
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
33
Videos
1
Links
27
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
128 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
57
44.5%
🔥
33
25.8%
👍
21
16.4%
🤩
12
9.38%
🤯
5
3.91%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @toneastafrica. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤑Gram’s week
It’s actually absurd when you think about it
We’re in an ecosystem where the project's official account has been silent for over 2 months, doesn’t post anything and hasn’t been active at all
Yet, despite that the community is super active. Projects are launching, builders are building, memecoins are booming...
Imagine when they all start bull posting GRAM
$GRAM is very likely to break past the $2 le…
The TeleGRAM community is expressing their frustration over the delay in the launch of the Gram Wallet
In July, Telegram Founder Pavel Durov announced that a native non-custodial Gram Wallet would be coming to every Telegram app before the end of summer
Then on August 31, he published a post on his Telegram channel stating that the wallet was ready but that only some users would receive it initially, while everyone…
🤑When GRAM reaches ATH we all know the trenches will be back with the familiar refrain
and we may even see people who once said TON memecoins were shit becoming the very same people holding and saying MTONGA!
There has rarely been a signal this obvious or this significant
We’re talking about Telegram and its native blockchain (Tech Superiority)
This is not about FOMO and I’m not here to tell anyone to buy the dip.…
💎 Tonkeeper Is Now Keeper — Goes Multichain
📣Official word from the team: Tonkeeper is now Keeper.
ℹ Same self-custodial wallet,NFTs, staking, DNS all stay. It now also holds Bitcoin, Ethereum, TRON, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, and Base, with more chains coming.
🔗Cross-chain swaps are in-app. 0% swap fees until Sept 22. Multichain is live on iOS and Android now; web, desktop, and extension next.
📺@PozzTV | 👍@pzPTSbot
BREAKING: TON's Nakamoto Coefficient Just Hit 90
🤑TON blockchain has raised its decentralization threshold, so now 90 independent entities would need to coordinate to disrupt consensus.
This means TON is now more decentralized than many major Layer-1s, including high-throughput network such as Solana and Avalanche.
Ultimately, infra that is difficult to control is a prerequisite for mainstream adoption and TON con…
💬Telegram has over 1 billion monthly active users, however, WhatsApp remains the dominant messaging platform across most African countries.
Yet Ethiopia stands out as one of Telegram’s strongest African user bases.
WhatsApp is estimated to have around 200 million users across Africa, with Nigeria alone accounting for roughly 90–100 million.
In Ethiopia, WhatsApp has approximately 14–18 million users, nearly half o…
REDOTRADE TRADING CONTEST WINNERS! 🎉
The 10-day trading contest is over!
We have our TOP 3 WINNERS:
1st Place: @Mykingcrypto
2nd place: @Jooel88
3rd place: @TonJoo
Congratulations to the winners!
Thank you to everyone who joined. More contests coming soon, with bigger prizes, and more competition. Stay tuned!
To get started on RedoTrade and be ready for the next one join here: REDOTRADE
🤖 🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖
🤝 REDOTRADE × EYUEL PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT
RedoTrade is delighted to welcome Eyuel as an official partner in our global community network.
Eyuel is currently @Conso_tg Africa Head, TON East Africa community founder TON East Africa Community and AMB @webopenworld
After observing the product development direction, and commitment of the RedoTrade team, he decided to join us with mission to bring RedoTrade…
👍4🔥3❤2🤩1
Signed Joel
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @toneastafrica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON East Africa Community” (@toneastafrica), 230 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toneastafrica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
