Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŸ“€ TON Data Hub

Channel

πŸ“€ TON Data Hub

@tondatahub

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

758subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002332281877
TypeChannel
Username@tondatahub
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tondatahub

Growth

758761759.56 August 2026 β€” 761 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 761 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 758 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 758–761 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:08758-3
6 Aug 2026, 15:51761no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:48761first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 July 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

138 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯8158.7%
🐳1410.1%
πŸ’―139.42%
🀯107.25%
⚑75.07%
🍾42.90%
πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»42.90%
πŸ€”32.17%
🌚21.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2025 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 May 2026, 16:06 UTCβ‰ˆ2,240 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

4 public TON dashboards worth watching right now: 🌸 TON Staking Staking yield recently spiked toward ~20% APY in TON terms after higher emission. Track validators, liquid staking, inflation and real yield. https://dune.com/ton_foundation/staking 🌻 Fragment TON’s core utility protocol: usernames, numbers, gifts. TVL matters, but real on-chain revenue matters more. https://dune.com/ton_foundation/fragment 🏦 TON on C…

πŸ”₯7⚑2πŸ’―1

Signed Dan

23 Feb 2026, 15:05 UTC536 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tonpixoPhoto

πŸ„ Bring Tonpixo to any chat: 4 new ways to get insights on the fly. πŸ€– Last week our team focused on bringing AI-driven TON analytics straight into your daily chats. You no longer have to open the Mini App to get answers. Here is what we built for you: πŸ“ˆ On-Demand Charts Data visualization just got an upgrade. Tonpixo can now generate and send clean chart images directly in Telegram. Ask for it and get a picture in …

πŸ”₯8

Signed Dan

19 Feb 2026, 08:00 UTC489 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

New public Dune dashboard β€” TON CEX Flow Tracker. Tracks TON moving in and out of all major exchanges, updated daily. πŸŸ₯ ~160M TON currently on exchanges Binance (58M), Bybit (43M), OKX (25M) hold 78% of all CEX TON. πŸŸ₯ Daily flow: 2-6M TON each way Inflow = potential sell pressure. Outflow = accumulation. πŸŸ₯ Whale tracker included Top 50 largest deposits/withdraws in the last 7 days with clickable ton…

πŸ’―6πŸ”₯3πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»1

Signed Dan

12 Feb 2026, 09:55 UTC510 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Built a skill for your AI agent that automates TON blockchain data analysis using Dune datasets. Turns out collecting ton-labels all this time was worth it! πŸ”— github.com/ohld/ton-analyst

πŸ”₯3πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»2πŸ’―2

Signed Dan

11 Dec 2025, 08:22 UTCβ‰ˆ1,010 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

πŸ—£ Rethinking TON Data Contests for 2026 This year we ran three major analytics contests together with DeDust, EVAA, and Storm Trade. In the first two cases, the task was to build a complete, production-ready Dune dashboard for the project. Unfortunately, none of the submissions ended up being β€œideal,” so the teams ultimately assembled their final dashboard from pieces of multiple entries. For Storm Trade we tried a…

πŸ”₯9🍾4πŸ€”2

Signed Dan

23 Sept 2025, 08:02 UTCβ‰ˆ1,170 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Rewards for ton-labels We will send the rewards within a week, once the funds arrive in our wallets. We’re also considering adding the highest-earning and unlabelled apps to the list of addresses eligible for rewards. Stay tuned. In the meantime, which TON data do you find most interesting?

πŸ”₯9🐳1

Signed Dan

14 Sept 2025, 13:31 UTCβ‰ˆ1,240 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Guys, Thank you very much for labeling addresses from this list. But unfortunately we reward only for labeling addresses from this shortlist. Read the rules please. I’ll update the shortlist today, maybe some of your addresses will appear there. Also we might still reward for labeling apps with big tg stars withdraw volume. πŸ‘‰πŸ‘ˆ

πŸ’―3πŸ”₯2πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»1

Signed Dan

7 Sept 2025, 18:43 UTCβ‰ˆ1,390 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Which mini apps earn the most Telegram Stars? The stats are incomplete and include only labeled addresses. Help us label the rest! Go check the dashboard to find the unlabeled addresses. Source: https://dune.com/ton_foundation/ton-stars-withdrawals

πŸ”₯4🌚2🀯1

Signed Dan

1 Sept 2025, 16:35 UTCβ‰ˆ1,080 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Please take a look at this example PR: https://github.com/ton-studio/ton-labels/pull/688 1. @dudhhsbshs provided a screenshot of the target address being in our shortlist eligible for the reward 2. He provided his chain of thought and proofs of the address ownership. If the address belongs to a person, not an app, we will not accept that PR since we don’t want to deanonymize anyone. Labelling the addresses of apps…

πŸ”₯2πŸ’―1

Signed Dan

1 Sept 2025, 16:17 UTCβ‰ˆ1,030 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Hey guys, Wanna do the onchain research and get rewarded? 7 TON for the new app 4 TON for the existing app πŸ”₯Yes. This is another episode of our 🏷️ labelling competition 🏷️ 1. Find the owner of the wallet 2. If that’s an app -> add it to our github repo 3. Provide proofs and get rewarded. πŸ”— Don’t forget to READ THE RULES πŸ”— Dashboard with addresses: https://dune.com/ton_foundation/labelling

πŸ”₯1

Signed Dan

18 Aug 2025, 11:12 UTCβ‰ˆ1,200 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

TON is the most transparent chain. Why? Because we already have more than 2000 labels in our open-source ton-labels collection. And 8M custodial wallets for CEX, apps and even some trading bots. These tables are available on Dune: dune.ton_foundation.dataset_labels dune.ton_foundation.result_custodial_wallets That means we know the source or the destination of 70%+ jetton transfers. No other chain is transpa…

πŸ”₯5🀯5🐳4

Signed Dan

13 Aug 2025, 10:50 UTC895 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

πŸ•΅πŸ» REQUEST FOR LABELS We’ve added a next batch of the most popular & unlabelled addresses on TON. Go find their owners and add the labels to our repo. Note: not all labels are eligible for the 7 or 4 TON reward. Read the rules first. TL;DR: We reward only for labels related to apps on TON. We don’t want to dox anyone here 🌚 πŸ”— dune.com/ton_foundation/labelling

Signed Dan

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tondatahub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 273,235 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ“€ TON Data Hub” (@tondatahub), 758 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tondatahub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.