Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for tonblog.net

Channel

tonblog.net

@tonblognet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

465subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002190902646
TypeChannel
Username@tonblognet
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tonblognet

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

465474469.57 August 2026 — 474 subscribers7 August 2026 — 473 subscribers8 August 2026 — 473 subscribers16 August 2026 — 470 subscribers22 August 2026 — 467 subscribers30 August 2026 — 466 subscribers8 September 2026 — 465 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 32 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 464–475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 04:39465-1
30 Aug 2026, 04:18466-1
22 Aug 2026, 16:28467-3
16 Aug 2026, 02:22470-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:35473no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:00473-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:07474first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥931.0%
517.2%
custom 5233292314440401964413.8%
💔413.8%
🫡413.8%
😭26.90%
👍13.45%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
26
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonblognet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026

Есть у кого-то графический дизайнер?

6 Jun 2026, 14:23 UTC69 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52332923144404019643

8 May 2026, 15:27 UTCviews —

tonblog.net pinned «tonblog.net is back. Now in English. From today, this channel is English-first. I will cover TON, Telegram, AI agents, mini apps and crypto products with one simple filter: What changed? Why does it matter? What should builders, users and investors watch…»

8 May 2026, 15:27 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

tonblog.net is back. Now in English. From today, this channel is English-first. I will cover TON, Telegram, AI agents, mini apps and crypto products with one simple filter: What changed? Why does it matter? What should builders, users and investors watch next? The goal is not to chase every market candle. The goal is to track the parts of the Telegram x TON ecosystem that can become real consumer infrastructure.

1🔥1

4 May 2026, 16:57 UTC86 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✊ Telegram станет крупнейшим валидатором TON Дуров объявил третий шаг из семи по перезапуску блокчейна. - Комиссии в сети TON снижены в 6 раз. - Telegram заменит TON Foundation как основную движущую силу сети. - Telegram станет крупнейшим валидатором TON. Акцент делается на техническом развитии: обновлённый ton.org и новые инструменты для разработчиков.

1🔥1

20 Mar 2026, 10:30 UTC121 views10 reactions26 Starsread 8 August 2026

Надо поговорить… В общем тут будет много всего поэтому пойдём по полочкам: ——————————————— Во-первых в связи с обстоятельствами в нашей жизни и в мире мы переходим на англоязычную аудиторию и переходим на западный рынок и больше не занимается только TON. Чем это вызвано думаю каждый из вас сам понимает. ——————————————— Это был достаточно интересный период моей жизни и жизни моих коллег за эти 3 года, но увы жизнь

💔4🫡4😭2

17 Mar 2026, 21:11 UTC141 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

промокод в яндекс еде. почти 100% скидка. работает на любой ресторан. уничтожайте Lvkspdelivery

🔥1

17 Mar 2026, 09:41 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☠️ Доля неудачных запросов к серверам Telegram из России достигла 80% — фактически мессенджер уже перестал полноценно функционировать: файлы и сообщения у большинства пользователей без VPN отправляются с задержкой.

1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonblognet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“tonblog.net” (@tonblognet), 465 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonblognet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.