Channel
@tomskasiccentre
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
191subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002188158428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tomskasiccentre |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tomskasiccentre |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 17:22 | 191 | +4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 187 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 188 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 189 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 188 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 187 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 187 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 64.5% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 19.4% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☀️Китай завершает создание «искусственного Солнца» Закончилось строительство гигантского магнита весом 582 тонны для проекта управляемого термоядерного синтеза. Первую выработку электроэнергии планируют начать уже к 2030 году. В перспективе проект должен обеспечить человечество практически неисчерпаемым и безуглеродным источником энергии. Скоро майнить BTC будет совсем бесплатно❓
⛏️Обычный Bitaxe с одним ASIC-чипом добыл блок и получил полную награду 3,1382 BTC ($200 580). Хешрейт устройства — всего ≈1 TH/s, без какого-либо разгона. При мощности 1 TH/s вероятность найти блок — примерно 1 раз в 16 000 лет. Это событие настолько редкое, что его шансы сравнимы с настоящим выигрышем в лотерею.
👍2
🔎Аналитики сравнили покупки китов BTC во время ключевых коррекций рынка: • Март 2020 — накоплено +150 000 BTC, после чего цена выросла примерно в 18 раз. • Ноябрь 2022 — накоплено +180 000 BTC, затем последовал рост примерно в 7 раз. • Июль 2026 — уже накоплено +270 000 BTC.
Купим вашу криптовалюту за наличные USDT, BTC, DOGE, LTC и т.д. По всем вопросам пишите: @Zemlyaninnn
👍5
Как там «надёжные» активы❓ По глубине просадки от пиков драгметаллы и нефть сейчас мало чем отличаются от крипты: ▶Нефть — -41%. ▶Платина — -46%. ▶Палладий — -45%. ▶Золото — -30%. ▶Серебро — -52%.
❤1
⚠️ Плановые работы в понедельник В понедельник, 22 июня, у нас пройдут обычные технические работы. Наш ЦОД будет временно отключен на несколько часов. 🕐 Время отключения: С 13:00 до 18:00
📍 Хешрейт BTC впервые в истории ушел в затяжное падение. С пика прошло 227 дней, мощность сети упала на 25%. Красные полосы на графике означают мощную капитуляцию: майнеры массово выключают оборудование. Но для тех, кто остался в сети, это отличный шанс заработать. Вот почему. ➕ Плюсы для выживших майнеров Меньше конкуренции. Слабые игроки и старые устройства выключаются. Делить награду за блоки теперь приходится с …
❤2👍2🔥1
⚠️✴️#BTC #крипто #презентация #майнинг BTC приблизился к своей 200-недельке. Это зона, вокруг которой, исторически, происходили массовые ликвидации и начинало формироваться "глобальное дно". "Прострелы" цен ниже 200-недельки - это норма. Сейчас многие ждут падения курса в район $55 000 - 50 000
👍2
💼 BTC по $62 000: Кризис или лучшая инвестиционная возможность года? Коллеги, пока спекулянты фиксируют убытки, давайте включим мышление крупных инвесторов. Текущая просадка — это не крах, а закономерная перестройка рынка. 📈 Инвестиционный разбор ситуации: Техника и Смарт Мани: По волнам Эллиотта завершается финальная коррекционная Волна C. Крупный капитал выдавливает с рынка маржинальных игроков. Главный магнит для…
👍4
🔥 Безопасное размещение вашего майнинг-оборудования 5.5 ₽/кВт! Ищете надежную локацию для размещения асиков? Наш профессиональный майнинг-отель предлагает идеальные условия для стабильной работы вашего оборудования без лишних хлопот. Почему выбирают нас: Контроль профи. Оборудование обслуживают опытные техники. Полная безопасность. Территория находится под круглосуточной охраной. Непрерывный мониторинг. Следим за р…
📊 Как устроен 4-летний цикл Биткоина и где мы СЕЙЧАС? Гид для майнера Каждый профессиональный майнер обязан понимать циклы рынка. Это помогает вовремя обновлять оборудование, фиксировать прибыль и не отключать асики в убыток на самом дне. Вся экономика BTC завязана на халвинге (уполовинивании награды за блок), который происходит каждые 210 000 блоков (примерно раз в 4 года). Сокращение эмиссии запускает предсказуемый…
МАЙНИНГ ПОД КЛЮЧ pinned a video
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tomskasiccentre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МАЙНИНГ ПОД КЛЮЧ” (@tomskasiccentre), 191 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomskasiccentre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.