Channel
@tomsk_ufas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
334subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001622383379 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tomsk_ufas |
| Created | 17 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tomsk_ufas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 334 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 333 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 333 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 20 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (20 March 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,878 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
17 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 70.6% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 29.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Суд подтвердил: заказчики обязаны признавать победителя уклонившимся, если тот представил неверные документы при подписании контракта. 📝Апелляционный суд поддержал решение Томского УФАС по делу о 19 заказчиках. Победитель, участвуя в совместном аукционе на поставку бумаги, при подтверждении добросовестности, подписывая контракт, представил неверную реестровую запись. Часть заказчиков признали участника уклонившимся.…
👍1
Суд: регистрация чужого бренда ради получения преимуществ на рынке является недобросовестной конкуренцией. Арбитражный суд поддержал решение Томского УФАС по делу о товарном знаке «FOXTRAY». Нарушитель попытался зарегистрировать обозначение, которое конкурент использовал с 2014 года. Объём продаж под этим брендом превысил 115 тысяч единиц. Суд подтвердил: подача заявки на регистрацию чужого бренда ради получения пр…
👍3
Томское УФАС выявило более 30 ресурсоснабжающих организаций, игнорирующих закон о закупках. 🔎Более 30 ресурсоснабжающих организаций Томской области не зарегистрированы в ЕИС и не разместили положения о закупках. Они работают вне правового поля, заключая прямые договоры без конкурентных процедур. Это создаёт риск закупок по завышенным ценам. 📌В отношении 18 компаний из разных районов области возбуждены административ…
🔥2
Ситуация на рынке нефтепродуктов находится на контроле Томского УФАС России. ⛽Управлением на постоянной основе ведется ежедневный мониторинг цен на бензин и дизельное топливо. В адрес всех АЗС направлены запросы о предоставлении информации. 🏛️Ведомство также приняло участие в совещании Правительства Томской области, органов прокуратуры, глав муниципальных районов и городских округов, на котором обсуждались вопросы …
Томское УФАС признало ненадлежащей рекламу табачной продукции на заборе в Асино. Поводом стало обращение администрации Асиновского района. 🚧На заборе у входа в здание разместили конструкцию с изображением табачной продукции и адресами торговых точек. Возрастное ограничение на рекламе отсутствовало. 📝Закон «О рекламе» прямо запрещает рекламу табачной и никотинсодержащей продукции, а также курительных принадлежносте…
Арбитражный суд поддержал решение Томского УФАС о сговоре на торгах по вывозу мусора. 🚛 Региональный оператор и подрядчики заранее обсуждали документы, цену и круг участников будущих аукционов. Начальную цену контрактов необоснованно завышали. В ходе исполнения договоров стороны систематически не реагировали на нарушения. Санкции за срывы графика вывоза отходов не применялись. 📌 Суд признал доводы ведомства обоснов…
👍1🔥1
Томское УФАС защитило права предпринимателей на государственное финансирование. 📚Муниципальный акт лишал предпринимателей доступа к бюджетным средствам за дополнительное образование детей. Томское УФАС выявило, что Положение Колпашевского района исключало индивидуальных предпринимателей из системы финансирования, создавая преимущества для образовательных организаций. 📌 Антимонопольный орган выдал предупреждение. Ад…
🔥2
Томское УФАС дважды внесло организацию в реестр недобросовестных поставщиков. 💊Компания «Соцпарт» сорвала исполнение двух контрактов городской клинической больницы №1. Заказчик заключил контракты в декабре 2025 года на сумму более 900 тысяч рублей. Поставщик не исполнял заявки и игнорировал претензии медицинского учреждения. 🏛Комиссия Томского УФАС выяснила, что организация не устранила нарушения и не доказала попы…
👍1
Channel photo updated
В Томской области утвердили «дорожную карту» развития конкуренции до 2030 года. 📑 Губернатор подписал план содействия развитию конкуренции на 2026–2030 годы. Документ охватывает девять приоритетных рынков и призван снизить административные барьеры, поддержать предпринимателей и улучшить качество услуг. Основные направления: 📡 Доступ операторов к инфраструктуре в домах; 🚌 Прозрачная маршрутная сеть и пресечение неле…
Арбитражный суд Томской области полностью поддержал Томское УФАС и обязал охранную организацию вернуть более 9 миллионов рублей в бюджет. ⚖Суд признал недействительными аукцион и контракт на охрану детского сада в Стрежевом. Компания «ЧОО «Содружество» предоставила подложный контракт, якобы подтверждающий опыт выполнения работ. На деле этот контракт был заключён с другой организацией. 📌 Суд обязал компанию вернуть …
👍2
Томское УФАС России подвело итоги рассмотрения жалоб в сфере закупок за первый квартал 2026 года. 📑 В ведомство поступило 69 жалоб на действия заказчиков и участников торгов. Из них 62 жалобы рассмотрены по существу. Комиссия признала обоснованными 10 жалоб, установила иные нарушения и выдала 12 предписаний об устранении нарушений. Самым частым нарушением стало неверное применение национального режима, 6 случаев. 🔎…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tomsk_ufas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 242,867 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Томское УФАС России” (@tomsk_ufas), 334 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomsk_ufas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.