Channel
@tomnitsky
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
107subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002512892475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tomnitsky |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tomnitsky |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 107 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 105 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 105 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
154 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5427232022252764138 | 104 | 67.5% | |
| custom 5307495098613773492 | 22 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5449460324845494346 | 12 | 7.79% | |
| custom 5343955939277960600 | 7 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5199417709808339622 | 6 | 3.90% | |
| custom 5465286325848526986 | 2 | 1.30% | |
| custom 5433985987174743499 | 1 | 0.649% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2025 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tomnitsky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 November 2025 to 16 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Приготовил себе обэд 😵💫 Честно говоря так непривычно что-то постить в социальных сетях, уже и забыл как это делается, вспоминаю потихонечку
custom 54272320222527641387custom 51994177098083396222
Обновился, сбросил лишнее💪
custom 54272320222527641387
Друг мне отправил фотографию со времён, когда жил в Москве, была своя школа по диджеингу, делали классные вечеринки, которых я тоже был владелец и жил на Таганке в центре Москвы – интересное было время Сейчас период сбора всех этих деталей, лучших граней меня за все мои периоды жизни и переход новый этап – интересно, мощно Фотка забавная, но живая такая)
custom 542723202225276413813
Нашел классную визуализацию того, как мы теряемся в выдуманном будущем, забывая что у нас есть только - этот момент сейчас
custom 54272320222527641383
Рекомендую к просмотру. Для некоторых из вас будет ценная информация, в которой найдете либо ответы, либо подсказки https://youtu.be/8ziJUOcr__M?si=0zRvgIqZ8fl5O9SV
custom 51994177098083396221custom 54272320222527641381
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54272320222527641383
Прекрасные девушки, женщины и девочки! Сегодня ваш день и я хочу чтобы вы не только в этот день ощущали свою внутреннюю женщину, а каждый день! Чтобы ваша любовь к себе и к миру была всегда с вами и с нами. Без вас не было бы все этой красоты, эстетики и прекрасного☯️ Не подавляйте себя, не подстраивайтесь не под кого, раскрывайте свою внутреннюю женщину и не бойтесь её. Вы прекрасны, с праздником вас❤️🔥 Всем деву…
custom 54272320222527641389custom 51994177098083396223
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54272320222527641388custom 53074950986137734923custom 54652863258485269862
Сегодня день, когда люди почему-то должны друг другу дарить подарки, делать сюрпризы и признаваться в любви. Моё видение немножко отличается, поэтому хочется сказать иное. Признавайтесь чаще в любви себе, своим близким, родным и семье - это значительно важнее, чем социальное одобрение от тех, кому не хватает любви, внимания и самоценности, поэтому требуют этого извне. Круто в детстве получить или подарить валентинк…
custom 53074950986137734927custom 54272320222527641385custom 54494603248454943461
На тему сегодняшних рекордов по скорости вычислений и решений задач😂
custom 54494603248454943467custom 54272320222527641384custom 54339859871747434991
Цена роста и фильтр реальности По мере взросления приходит трезвость: большинство людей ненадёжны. Последние полтора года были самыми сложными и самыми мощными в моей жизни. Я запускал десятки проектов, большинство из них были провальными, но каждый давал опыт, расширение мышления и навыки. Я увидел простую закономерность: друзья и знакомые остаются, пока с тобой легко и весело. Когда появляются реальные сложности…
custom 542723202225276413820custom 53074950986137734925
Сегодня Сибирь полностью описывает все ощущения от слова «Сибирь»😂 Это от холода воздух замёрз и замер
custom 53439559392779606005
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @tomnitsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 612,533 of 1,599,580entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Альманах Томницкого” (@tomnitsky), 107 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomnitsky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.