Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tomato🍅

@tomatetoovosh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

122subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001778631178
TypeChannel
Username@tomatetoovosh
Created26 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tomatetoovosh

Growth

121122121.58 August 2026 — 121 subscribers9 August 2026 — 121 subscribers14 August 2026 — 122 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:33122+1
9 Aug 2026, 04:01121no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:00121first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
110.0%
avg views ÷ 122 subscribers
Avg views / post
134
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (9 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,611
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 54s
Average length
1m 27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54543897490054263454725.1%
custom 52809920408411341623619.3%
❤‍🔥3317.6%
custom 54586722866660807062714.4%
🔥115.88%
custom 526718125137830030094.81%
custom 528310526782999724273.74%
custom 624473604583379812263.21%
custom 532808628422732796742.14%
custom 531228116106033598421.07%
custom 532827959211538561221.07%
custom 522905447020943078910.535%
custom 528065439628213097710.535%
custom 536399399323333043610.535%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC90 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Дима: а вы где? Когда домой пойдёте? Также мы: *под музыку пиратов плывём за сокровищами*

custom 54543897490054263459custom 52671812513783003005custom 62447360458337981225custom 53122811610603359842

1 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC105 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отфотали, ждите😏

custom 54543897490054263457custom 52671812513783003004custom 52831052678299972422custom 52290544702094307891custom 52806543962821309771custom 62447360458337981221

31 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вика: *жалуется, что я заставляю её готовить ужин* я: -а если я тебе ред булл из Таиланда дам? Вика: -где масло? ПХППХПХ

custom 53282795921153856122

28 Jul 2026, 03:24 UTC141 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Намечается съёмка на выходные, а это значит, что я покажу в ближайшее время свой ещё один косплан, которые лежит у меня с весны🤩

custom 52831052678299972424

25 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC175 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот такой кэш попадал нам после выступления💲 И, наконец-то, железная воля была куплена🫨

❤‍🔥12custom 53280862842273279674custom 54543897490054263453custom 52831052678299972421custom 53639939932333304361

25 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC151 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Верёвка немножко подставила и под тайминги боевой сцены не успели выйти. Я ещё и харизму потеряла в бою. Оба получили по коленкам. Но это мой 1ый опыт с таким костюмом, казалось бы, боди и шорты, а за ним стоит тяжёлый крафт, хвост и грим(который был очень не устойчив на моей коже), духота дала о себе знать, рукоять скользила(хотя на ладони наносила меньше грима, чем на тело). Но мне все понравилось, это был очень хо

custom 54543897490054263457custom 52809920408411341625custom 54586722866660807065

25 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC132 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

А вот и наше выступление🙄

custom 52809920408411341627custom 54543897490054263454custom 54586722866660807062❤‍🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC130 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Все гости и выступающие теперь в моей краске, размножение томатов - газ🍅

custom 52809920408411341626custom 54543897490054263456custom 54586722866660807065

25 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC128 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52809920408411341628custom 54543897490054263455custom 54586722866660807064❤‍🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC134 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ребята, завтра выступаю в своём блоке, который начнётся в 17:05, почти в самом конце фестиваля🤨 Но меня можно будет найти на площадке в течении всего дня, загримируем тело, можете подходить щелкаться👍 Боевой режим активирован, увидимся завтра🙂

❤‍🔥7

22 Jul 2026, 04:10 UTC170 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌳«ҕиоᴀлχимия дᴇлᴀᴇт ʏпоᴘ нᴇ нᴀ «создᴀнии», ᴀ нᴀ «измᴇнᴇнии». искᴀть скᴘытыᴇ своиствᴀ сʏպᴇств, ʏсиливᴀть иχ, комҕиниᴘовᴀть. ᴘᴇзʏльтᴀты всᴇrдᴀ ʏдивитᴇльны. дᴀ... жизнь — поᴘᴀзитᴇльнᴀя вᴇպь. сколько всᴇrо мы ᴇպᴇ нᴇ знᴀᴇм?» ⭐️Genshin Impact - Sucrose🌟 Ph: Тучка⭐️ #cosplaytoma ⭐️

❤‍🔥12custom 528099204084113416210custom 54586722866660807067custom 54543897490054263452🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @tomatetoovosh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,028,468 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tomato🍅” (@tomatetoovosh), 122 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomatetoovosh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.