Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tommy harmony

Channel

Tommy harmony

@tom_kaulitzharmonyru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

103subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003005834056
TypeChannel
Username@tom_kaulitzharmonyru
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 14 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tom_kaulitzharmonyru

Growth

99104101.511 August 2026 — 104 subscribers11 August 2026 — 104 subscribers12 August 2026 — 103 subscribers19 August 2026 — 101 subscribers25 August 2026 — 99 subscribers1 September 2026 — 103 subscribers10311 August 20261 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 20 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98–105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 01:47103+4
25 Aug 2026, 10:3699-2
19 Aug 2026, 02:57101-2
12 Aug 2026, 18:27103-1
11 Aug 2026, 19:15104no change
11 Aug 2026, 19:02104first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

329 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53819477382146513818325.2%
custom 59786606743629400835316.1%
4012.2%
🍾226.69%
206.08%
custom 5368596956929086276185.47%
custom 5981254589796587653175.17%
custom 5217707948297441145154.56%
custom 5981108204426238416133.95%
custom 5981205841917777745123.65%
🎅123.65%
🔥123.65%
custom 598081761982389269661.82%
custom 598094720757714791761.82%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2025 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tom_kaulitzharmonyru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 October 2025 to 3 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 17:38 UTC153 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Пока контента с тх не планируется, но если кому интересно, в тт залила ещё 4 ролика с вайбами:) https://www.tiktok.com/@tokiohotel_byoxy?_t=ZS-8zTrfXyPOTA&_r=1

4

1 Jun 2026, 18:45 UTC157 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Возвращать контент?

  1. Да93%
  2. Нет8%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

4 Mar 2026, 05:43 UTC295 views32 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Video

Guess who’s back?… back again… 🤫 —— Видео можно посмотреть в TT , а ещё можно лайк поставить и подписаться ☺️

17🔥87

21 Jan 2026, 07:27 UTC426 views26 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

АХАХХАХАХА Я ЩАС УЛЕЧУ!!! ХАХАХАХХА

19🔥43

18 Jan 2026, 14:01 UTC329 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Когда-нибудь я уже привыкну видеть свои озвучки в рандомных соцсетях, выложенные не мной…

🎅103

16 Jan 2026, 09:28 UTC310 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня я постарела ещё на один год!

🍾226🎅2

19 Nov 2025, 08:37 UTC578 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Делитесь в комментариях, что получилось у вас?🩶

custom 597866067436294008310custom 53819477382146513814

12 Nov 2025, 20:32 UTC593 views32 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Задумалась я значит снова начать озвучивать мини видео с Tokio Hotel, как в старые добрые. Что думаете?

custom 597866067436294008319custom 53685969569290862767custom 53819477382146513816

12 Nov 2025, 20:30 UTC568 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

У меня кстати есть личный тгк, так, вдруг кому будет интересно. Оставлю здесь. Пс: я там чаще появляюсь, потому что выкладываю учебный процесс и личную жизнь 🤎🌟 📱@oxyykaulitzz

custom 536859695692908627611custom 53819477382146513813custom 59786606743629400833

3 Nov 2025, 00:08 UTC457 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🌹🧇Новый Эдит, пока только в тик токе выложила Признавайтесь, кто из вас любит Густава? 🤩

custom 538194773821465138119custom 59811082044262384166custom 52177079482974411453custom 59812058419177777452

1 Nov 2025, 08:21 UTC423 views28 reactionsread 11 August 2026

С прошедшим Вас тыквенным спасом🎃 Наряжались вчера? Показывайте в комментариях фоточки)

custom 538194773821465138116custom 52177079482974411456custom 59786606743629400834custom 59809472075771479171custom 59811082044262384161

21 Oct 2025, 22:22 UTC475 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Вопрос дня, как вы узнали обо мне и моем тгк?

custom 53819477382146513817custom 59809472075771479173custom 59786606743629400832

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @tom_kaulitzharmonyru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jun 2026, 18:45 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

Возвращать контент?

  1. Да93%
  2. Нет8%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2025 to 3 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 491,009 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tommy harmony” (@tom_kaulitzharmonyru), 103 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tom_kaulitzharmonyru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.