Channel
@tokrevcf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
349subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002521642311 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tokrevcf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tokrevcf |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 349 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 348 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 346 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 346 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
128 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 45 | 35.2% | |
| 🍓 | 27 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5242591279413495554 | 21 | 16.4% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 7.81% | |
| custom 5267070613020758858 | 7 | 5.47% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 5.47% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| custom 5269275842504061897 | 2 | 1.56% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀🤩.😀𝗷𝗮𝗯𝗳𝘂 𝗱𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆 + 𝗰𝗳 .. 🤩 😀🤩🍷равится химия между 🍷жаббером и 🍷у ? 🦝🦝 😀 😀⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🦢 😀🤩🍷отите найти много контента с ними ? 🫥🫥 ☁🤩⭐⭐ 🫥 😀🍷огда вам в .. 🥹 😀𝗷𝗮𝗯𝗳𝘂 𝗱𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆 + 𝗰𝗳 !!🦝🦝🥹🫥🫥 🤩ссылка на канал 🤩администрация 🤩вп пост 🤩предложка 🤩буст cr : kandiraffie on x
Signed DNI +REST 𐔌 ⸝⸝ ୵ĸ៉𝚕𝚢ׇняֻĸׁ𝚊 ՞֦𝚊н𝚐៌𝚕𝙵่𝙳᳣᳜ ᝰ.ᐟˎˊ˗ #Kazutoraspartner #свага
В комментах затронули тему отношений с персонажами, и я вспомнила про свои ос×канон шипы. Когда читаю фф, там часто ожп выставляют очень сильными, чтобы таким образом они могли нормально взаимодействовать и быть наравне. Но, как по мне, это не обязательно(?). Просто в большинстве своём канон персонажи — это буйные подростки, поэтому сила может разве что заставить их проявить уважение к потенциальному противнику или т…
🤝3❤🔥1🍓1
Signed Kabenok
Вопрос на засыпку. Что вас бесит в фаноне ваших любимок? Меня, например, раздражает, когда из Харучиё делают либо торча, либо манипулятора. Чел щаглотил таблетку, посмеялся в позе креветки и встал обратно с абсолютно ровной спиной, но это восприняли так, будто его разнесло. Хотя в том моменте Санзу вёл себя как всегда, и таблеточка явно была не сильнодействующей. Про кукловода/манипулятора/#дазайкинни — вообще песн…
🍓7❤🔥4
Signed Kabenok
мине очень скучно неонон сасун 🥰💙 мем я сделала ра💜❣️звеселите меня #тейк ➢ @tokrevcff_bot & @tokcfanonbot
❤🔥9🍓4custom 52425912794134955542
Signed Kabenok
Этот фандом блять не развивается . Когда ии ос начнут бойкотировать? #тейк ➢ @tokrevcff_bot & @tokcfanonbot
custom 52425912794134955547
Signed Kabenok
Дайте прем эмодзи с тм немношка🤏🤏🤏🤏 #тейк ➢ @tokrevcff_bot & @tokcfanonbot
🍓1custom 52425912794134955541
Signed Kabenok
я захотела, я сделала чтобы лайкнуть, акк в тт - @torachan228 #тейк ➢ @tokrevcff_bot & @tokcfanonbot
custom 52425912794134955548custom 52670706130207588582custom 52692758425040618972
Signed Kabenok
я сделала фотку получше выложите вот этот тейк неанон сасун #тейк ➢ @tokrevcff_bot & @tokcfanonbot
❤🔥9❤3custom 52425912794134955543🍓1
Signed Kabenok
Так как в нашем фд часто гуляют разные мнения о Кене Вакуи (автор манги) и его словах по поводу сюжета, я решила собрать все интервью и Q&A. Вот списочек всего, что удалось нарыть. Ещё есть короткие комментарии мангаки в гайдбуках, могу прикрепить их в комментариях под этим постом (все, какие мне удалось отсканировать). https://www.lefigaro.fr/bd/rencontre-avec-ken-wakui-le-mangaka-qui-a-cree-le-phenomene-tokyo-reve…
❤🔥11custom 52670706130207588582❤1
Signed Kabenok
Простите, меня бомбит с таких дегенератов, которые верят ЯНДКС АЛИСЕ😭 и показывают её быстрые ответы, где тупо собрана инфа с разных сайтов, как пруф. Мало Вакуи конфликтов с издательством было! Давайте припишем ему в грехи ещё и убийство, кражу и вымагательства👍 И конечно же бывший ЯКУДЗА (это вообще откуда высралось?) спокойно ходит на интервью и светит своим лицом. И плевать, что он никогда не называл себя даже "…
❤🔥7❤1
Signed Kabenok
Я почему-то так орнула, когда впервые увидела 17-летнего Вакасу. Он показался очень похожим на Сайто Хаджиме из Реквиема по Шинсэнгуми😅 #тейк ➢ @tokrevcff_bot & @tokcfanonbot
🔥6❤🔥2❤1
Signed Kabenok
Фанаты ПэЯсу здесь есть? Самый лучший канон во всём ТМ — меня не переубедить😤 Неанон: Мю́ри #тейк ➢ @tokrevcff_bot & @tokcfanonbot
🍓13🐳6🔥4custom 52670706130207588583❤🔥2❤1
Signed Kabenok
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tokrevcf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“꒱꒱ ⛩️ TOKYO REVENGERS - confession。” (@tokrevcf), 349 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tokrevcf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.