5 Apr 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,700 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
disini buat nyatuin kronologi aja, update akun penipu nya di @marakscam ya
👍11
Signed REACT 🤮 = NIPU, CEK BIO
Channel
spill toko gabriel
@tokogabriel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003706381780 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tokogabriel |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 21 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tokogabriel |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 19 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 42
- Links
- 25
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 91.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
21 Mar 2026, 16:36 UTC≈2,210 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
21 Mar 2026, 16:36 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
21 Mar 2026, 16:35 UTC≈2,140 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
https://t.me/bantaipenip/22500 ch : @rralat & @bbelas username : @kkanibaI sebelumnya ngga pakai username, pasti lagi beli username baru ya?
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
21 Mar 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,430 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
id penipu : @KaIeeng id korban : @ceerya id ch (kalau ada) : - numeric id si penipu : 8665841797 kronologi : cek @premhasilnipu
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
21 Mar 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
id penipu : @kkoIam id korban : @hmburgear id ch (kalau ada) : @peemuIa numeric id si penipu : - kronologi : mau beli nokos luar, udah tf eh malah clear chat, syukurnya masih ada akun dia di akun gua
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
21 Mar 2026, 16:34 UTC857 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
id penipu : @saaIur id korban : @vcough id ch (kalau ada) : @ssaIuran + @SaIurkan numeric id si penipu : 7682845384 kronologi : awal nya dia nawarin di comsect wtb https://t.me/basewtb/6376355?comment=13110546 tapi komennya udah dihapus, habis itu aku chat nanyain harga. terus aku yakin, karna testie nya juga banyak jadi aku langsung percaya ga ngerasa curiga samsek. setelah aku payment dia langsung clear chat, di ch…
❤1
Signed react 🤮 = penipu @marakscam
21 Mar 2026, 04:48 UTC612 viewsread 12 August 2026
50 basic 7d hi baddie! hit me up as seller ꢾ୧ langsung on proses, trusted dan avail rekber 🐩 sudah banyak bignom disini ⅋ satset tanpa antri!
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @tokogabriel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,052,255 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“spill toko gabriel” (@tokogabriel), 19 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tokogabriel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.