Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юрист Токмакова | Банкротство

Channel

Юрист Токмакова | Банкротство

@tokmakova_urist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,489subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001300509314
TypeChannel
Username@tokmakova_urist
Created20 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tokmakova_urist

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,4897,5407,514.56 August 2026 — 7,540 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,540 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,536 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,533 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,529 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,522 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,519 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,516 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,513 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,507 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,500 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,496 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,489 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,481–7,548 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 00:587,489-7
13 Sept 2026, 02:177,496-4
9 Sept 2026, 07:397,500-7
3 Sept 2026, 18:407,507-6
31 Aug 2026, 14:257,513-3
25 Aug 2026, 05:347,516-3
22 Aug 2026, 07:467,519-3
18 Aug 2026, 20:077,522-7
16 Aug 2026, 05:367,529-4
12 Aug 2026, 16:147,533-3
9 Aug 2026, 21:507,536-4
6 Aug 2026, 10:197,540no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:587,540first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.70%
avg views ÷ 7,489 subscribers
Avg views / post
127
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held29 (11 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total127
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

335 reactions across 29 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10731.9%
8625.7%
😱4011.9%
🔥3811.3%
💯257.46%
🤔102.99%
🤯72.09%
👎51.49%
🤝51.49%
😢41.19%
😁30.896%
👏20.597%
🤬20.597%
😐10.299%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 29 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tokmakova_urist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC127 views11 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Банк заблокировал карту и онлайн-банкинг по 161-ФЗ (операция без добровольного согласия клиента, ОБДС), хотя я была ни в чём не виновата. Искала юриста по банковским спорам, который поможет разблокировать карты. Татьяна Токмакова провела консультацию, подготовила заявление о преступлении в полицию по факту мошенничества с переводом, составила заявление в ЦБ об исключении из базы данных, а также заявление в банк. Всё

5👍3💯2🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC332 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🚗 Отдали ключи от машины другу или родственнику — оказались ответчиком по чужому ДТП Машину попросил родственник, коллега или приятель. Ключи и документы у него, за руль сели не Вы. А потом авария — и повестка в суд приходит на Ваше имя. Верховный суд разобрал именно такой случай и объяснил, кто в итоге платит Что произошло 🚕 В аварии пострадала машина истицы. Разбил водитель, который в этот момент управлял ее авто

👍63😱2💯1🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC243 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📢 У Вас есть неделя, чтобы повлиять на правила ведения кредитной истории Мы писали о проекте указания ЦБ, который меняет Положение № 758-П о порядке формирования кредитной истории Пока документ в статусе проекта, любой человек вправе направить по нему замечания, и Банк России обязан их учесть при подготовке финальной редакции 💯 📝 Обсуждение закрывается 23 августа 2026 года, комментарии принимаются по адресу Baranov

👍4🤯2💯1🤬1

18 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC180 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Кредитная история узнает о Вас больше — ЦБ переписывает правила с 2027 года Банк России опубликовал второй проект указания о внесении изменений в Положение «О порядке формирования кредитной истории» — документ, который определяет, что именно банки, МФО и бюро кредитных историй записывают о каждом Вашем займе 📝 Обсуждение идёт с 14 по 23 августа 2026 года, вступить в силу поправки должны с 1 октября 2027 года — пани

👍32💯2🤯1😱1

17 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC224 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Свидетельство о браке отменяют? Бумага в ЗАГСе перестаёт быть главной 📝 Минюст опубликовал для обсуждения законопроект о переходе ЗАГСов на «реестровую модель» — меняется сам принцип, как государство подтверждает брак, развод, рождение и смену имени ГЛАВНЫМ документом станет выписка из Единого государственного реестра ЗАГС, она будет автоматически приходить в личный кабинет на «Госуслугах» сразу после регистрации

👎5👍3🔥2🤬1😱1

14 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC314 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Вы читаете кредитный договор: ставка зафиксирована. Проходит пара лет, и банк увеличивает платёж 📝 Вы идёте разбираться, ссылаетесь на ст. 29 ФЗ «О банках...» и ст. 310 ГК РФ: менять условия договора в одностороннем порядке нельзя. Суд с этим не соглашается Банк действительно ничего не нарушил. Секрет спрятан не в законе, а в самом договоре, который подписали Дело в том, что банки почти никогда не фиксируют одну ст

👍52🔥2💯1😱1

13 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC311 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Долги ЖКХ: как бороться, когда и что отключают? 🚰 Закон куда аккуратнее к должникам, чем кажется: есть чёткие условия, сроки и целый список услуг, которые не тронут ни при каком долге 🧾 Отключить вправе только если долг накопился минимум за 2 расчётных периода, причём считают его по нормативу потребления (даже если в квартире стоят счётчики) Особенно легко попасть в ловушку из-за единой квитанции: если оплачивать е

4😱4👍2😢1

11 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC321 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

👤: «Я рядовой на СВО, мне 53 года. Могу ли я уволиться по окончании контракта?» Для рядовых п. 1 ст. 49 № 53-ФЗ «О воинской обязанности и военной службе» установлен общий предельный возраст пребывания на службе — 50 лет. В 53 года этот порог формально уже пройден Достижение предельного возраста входит в закрытый перечень оснований для увольнения даже в период мобилизации, это прямо прописано в п. 5 указа Президента

4😱4👍1🤝1

10 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC314 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💥 Кредиты дают всё неохотнее — с 1 октября 2026 ЦБ ужесточает лимиты по выдаче кредитов для заёмщиков с высокой долговой нагрузкой Банкам и микрофинансовым организациям придётся оценивать риски куда строже, даже если у человека НЕТ ни одной ПРОСРОЧКИ и есть официальная работа Само решение не означает автоматический отказ: банк по-прежнему решает сам, кому и сколько давать 📊 Но свобода банка уже не та: ЦБ задал жёс

👍4💯4🤔2😱2😐1

6 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC447 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🚔 Дуть дважды в один мундштук разрешил Верховный суд Жительницу Нижегородской области остановили за рулём. Алкотестер показал 0,724 миллиграмма спирта на литр воздуха — её лишили прав на 1,5 года и оштрафовали на 30 тысяч рублей по ч. 1 ст. 12.8 КоАП РФ Женщина оспорила решение: по её словам, инспекторы дважды заставили её дышать в один и тот же мундштук, хотя для повторного теста, по её мнению, нужен новый ⚖️ Верх

😱6👍3💯2🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC456 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

За молчание счетчика теперь накажут рублём. С 1 августа управляющие компании ужесточили контроль за показаниями водосчетчиков 📆 Срок передачи данных теперь жёсткий: не позднее 25 числа каждого месяца, и приоритет — приложения и личные кабинеты, а не бумажки Забыли передать показания? Первые 3 месяца выставят счет по среднему расходу за полгода, это ещё терпимо А вот если тишина затянется дольше, включится норматив

👍63🔥2🤔2😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @tokmakova_urist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Юридические Тонкости
@sivakovairina · 109,670
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Кухня наизнанку - ЗАГОТОВКИ
@bankanaiznanku · 39,863
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юрист Токмакова | Банкротство” (@tokmakova_urist), 7,489 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tokmakova_urist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.