Channel
@token_monitor_alerts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
926subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001625394650 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @token_monitor_alerts |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/token_monitor_alerts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 926 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 927 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 5 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
2024年DEX期货合约累计交易量达2850亿美元，Hyperliquid占比78.8% 金色财经报道，去年 12 月，DEX 期货合约交易量占 CEX 交易量的百分比创下历史新高，达到 10.17%，为近期历史高点。这一增长可以归因于 Hyperliquid、Jupiter、ApeX、Satori Finance 和 Drift 等平台的采用提升，这些平台在近几个月一直在增长。 在整个 2024 年，这些 DEX 的总交易量平均每月增长 26.5%。到 12 月，累计交易量达到 2850 亿美元。Hyperliquid 成为主导者，占 DEX 总交易量的 78.8%，12 月的月交易量超过 2.25 亿美元。紧随 Hyperliquid 之后的是 Jupiter，占据了 9.8%的市场份额，12 月的交易量超过 2800 万美元。
💩2
本周比特币现货ETF净流入2.553亿美元，增持2421.94枚BTC 金色财经报道， Deribit 亚太商务负责人 Lin Chen 于 X 发文表示：“本周 BTC 现货 ETF 总体表现为小幅净流入，尽管周三休市、周四大幅净流出，其余几天的流入量弥补了这一缺口，周总净流入达 2.553 亿美元，增持 2421.94 枚 BTC。 其中，周四贝莱德 IBIT 再次创下单日最大减持量 3516.57 枚 BTC，而周五市场情绪回暖，流入 2601.9 枚 BTC，富达当日增持 3684.64 枚。当前 BTC 价格有所回升，维持在 9.8 万美元附近宽幅震荡。”
近期在Hyperliquid上50倍巨额ETH空单地址系Resolv Labs的空头对冲仓位 金色财经报道，据链上分析师余烬监测，近期引起大家关注、在 Hyperliquid 上 50 倍做空了 3 万枚 ETH (约合 1.1 亿美元) 的 0x20c...4f5 地址，应该是 @ResolvLabs 的 delta 中性策略空头对冲仓位，而并非某个鲸鱼。 0x20c...4f5 地址与 Resolv 的 0xacB...b8e 合约地址相互间有多次转账，并且共用同一个 Binance 充值地址。 另外根据 Resolv 的介绍文档，他们通过永续合约做空 ETH 对冲，来实现 delta 中性策略。 所以，0x20c...4f5 地址应该是 Resolv 用于执行做空对冲的地址，而并非某个鲸鱼。
灰度去中心化AI基金昨日转出近88万枚GRT代币 金色财经报道，据Arkham监测数据显示，灰度去中心化AI基金昨日通过两笔交易转出总计87.9219万枚GRT代币，分别转入到“0xCE2”和“0x35e”两个开头未知地址。
若比特币突破10万美元，主流CEX累计空单清算强度将达8.45亿 金色财经报道，据 Coinglass 数据，若比特币突破 10 万美元，主流 CEX 累计空单清算强度将达 8.45 亿。反之，若比特币跌破 9.6 万美元，主流 CEX 累计多单清算强度将达 9.13 亿。
马斯克宣布将改变X算法以最大化用户不后悔的使用时间，遭到广泛反对 金色财经报道，马斯克宣布即将对X算法进行修改，将优先推广被认为具有信息性或教育性的内容，此举遭到了广泛反对。 马斯克称，计划中的修改是为了应对X上“太多负面消息”。他在1月3日的社交媒体帖子中写道：“我们的目标是最大化用户不后悔的使用时间。太多的负面消息被推送，从技术上来说会增加用户使用时间，但不会增加用户不后悔的使用时间。” 对此，X上的用户将算法变化描述为一种审查形式，并对于谁有权决定平台上的“负面内容”质疑马斯克。
全球链上RWA资产突破150亿美元，30日涨幅达11.97% 金色财经报道，根据RWA监控平台RWA.xyz数据，截至2025年1月5日，全球链上RWA资产突破150亿美元，达153.1亿美元，30日涨幅达11.97%；资产持有人数量突破80000人，达81,495，30日涨幅达2.6%；资产发行商总数增长至119个；稳定币资产价值2036.6亿美元，30日涨幅达4.21%，稳定币持有人数量高达1.41亿。 此外，美国国债代币化资产规模突破40亿美元，达40.9亿美元，7日涨幅为0.27%；持有人数量下跌至12205，7日跌幅为2.32%。
加密货币倡导者John Deaton提议特朗普政府调查Operation Chokepoint 2.0计划 金色财经报道，前美国检察官和加密货币倡导者 John Deaton 已提议特朗普政府对 Operation Chokepoint 2.0 计划展开调查。这是一项未经证实的计划，据称试图将加密货币公司从传统银行系统中剔除。
某鲸鱼花费7,002枚SOL买入的497万枚swarms ，目前浮盈30万美元 金色财经报道，据 Lookonchain 监测，10 小时前，一位鲸鱼花费 7,002 SOL （150 万美元）购买了 497 万枚 swarms ，目前浮盈 30 万美元。
慢雾：2024年加密领域发生410起安全事件，损失达20.13亿美元，同比下降19.02% 金色财经报道，安全机构慢雾日前发布了《2024年区块链安全与反洗钱年度报告》，其中指出： 根据慢雾区块链被黑事件档案库（SlowMist Hacked）统计，2024年共发生安全事件410件，损失高达20.13亿美元。对比2023年（共464件，损失约24.86亿美元），损失同比下降19.02%。 DeFi仍然是最常受到攻击的领域。2024年DeFi安全事件共339件，占总安全事件数的82.68%，损失高达10.29亿美元，对比2023年（共282件，损失约7.73亿美元），损失同比上升33.12%。 从生态来看，以太坊损失最高，达4.65亿美元。其次是BSC，达8,735万美元。 从事件原因来看，合约漏洞导致的安全事件最多，达99件，导致损失约2.14亿美元。其次为账号被黑导致的安全事件。
摩根大通：预计2024年有创纪录的780亿美元进入加密市场 金色财经报道，摩根大通全球市场策略师在一份报告中表示，在特朗普胜选的帮助下，2024 年是数字资产的关键一年，预计有创纪录的 780 亿美元进入加密市场。这笔资本流入包括几个关键部分：270 亿美元的加密基金净流入、140 亿美元投资于 CME 期货、加密风险投资基金筹集的 140 亿美元、MicroStrategy 购买的 220 亿美元的比特币，比特币矿工又购买的 10 亿美元的比特币。换言之，仅 MicroStrategy 的比特币购买量就占去年创纪录的加密市场资本流入的 28%。
Base协议负责人：今年或会出现链上构建者+主播原型 金色财经报道，Base 协议负责人 Jesse Pollak 发文表示，今年有很大机会出现链上构建者+主播（onchain builder + streamer）原型。利用 AI + 链上以 10 倍的速度发布酷炫的东西，在流媒体上直播，并迅速走红。Jesse Pollak 称对此很乐意提供相关指导，并给出了相关建议： 至少投入 6 个月 每周直播 5-6 天，每次约 2 小时 找到 2-3 名其他主播一起合作推广 使用人工智能做一切事情——编码、设计、营销 不要等待完美的想法，立即开始。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @token_monitor_alerts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 736,789 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TokenMonitor - 快讯频道” (@token_monitor_alerts), 926 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/token_monitor_alerts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.