🔊 코스피, 프리마켓 1.56%↑..알파벳 CAPEX 확대 1️⃣ 알파벳의 2분기 호실적과 AI 관련 CAPEX 전망 상향이 반도체 투자심리를 지지했다. 2️⃣ 코스피는 프리마켓에서 1.56% 상승 출발했으며 삼성전자와 SK하이닉스가 각각 2%대 강세를 보였다. 3️⃣ 알파벳은 연간 CAPEX 가이던스를 1950억~2050억 달러로 올리며 국내 반도체 관련 불안을 완화했다. https://link.stockplus.com/5C89/qcf3d65a

Channel
오늘 공부 노트!
@todaystudynote
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
269subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001408510318 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @todaystudynote |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/todaystudynote |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 269 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 268 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 268 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.6%
- avg views ÷ 269 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 28.6
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 429 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 00s
- Average length
- 1m 00s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://m.blog.naver.com/pillion21/224350911561
https://m.blog.naver.com/doctordk/224353056616
https://blog.naver.com/jeunkim/224351000383?fromRss=true&trackingCode=rss
https://blog.naver.com/arirangya/224353120094?fromRss=true&trackingCode=rss
https://blog.naver.com/cy2863/224352841556?fromRss=true&trackingCode=rss
https://blog.naver.com/dutch_east_india_co/224352234015?fromRss=true&trackingCode=rss
주식 투자로 큰 부를 쌓은 분들, 신화적인 투자자가 된 분들은 수없이 많은 각자만의 투자 철학과 방식, 다양한 매매 스타일로 성공했습니다. 반면 주식으로 패가망신 한 썰은 망했다는 사람과 해먹은 액수 정도만 다르지 파멸로 이르는 과정이나 방식이 대동소이 합니다. 『행복한 가정은 모두 엇비슷하고, 불행한 가정은 불행한 이유가 제각기 다르다.』는 <안나 까레리나>의 도입부가 떠오르는 대목입니다. https://www.postype.com/@my-cabbage0/post/22722569
지난 30년 동안, 인터넷 기업을 만드는 데 있어 법인 설립 후 가장 중요한 미션은 "채용"이었습니다. 어쨌든 우수한 사람들을 모으는 거죠. 경영자의 일 대부분이 거기에 있습니다. 저도 오랫동안 그렇게 생각해왔습니다. 그런데, AI 솔로프레너에서는 첫 번째 일이 달랐습니다. 채용이 아니라, 조직 만드는 것입니다. 참고로 한 것은, "회사는 미니 AGI가 된다" 라는 사고방식이었습니다. 그리고 저는, 그 사고방식을 거의 그대로 AI에게 넘겨주고, "이 방침으로 회사를 만들자"고 지시했습니다. 실제로 조직을 만든 것은 제가 아닙니다. AI입니다. 그곳에서 일어난 일에 충격을 받았습니다. 영업. 개발. 마케팅. 회계. 법무. 전통적으로는 별개의 부서로 존재하던 것들이, 정보와 로직을 가진 폴더로 정리되어 가는 것입니다. 그리고 필요하다면,…
https://m.blog.naver.com/engineerinvestor/224349448356
https://blog.naver.com/slowwalkingbull/224347194353?fromRss=true&trackingCode=rss
https://blog.naver.com/slowwalkingbull/224347027459?fromRss=true&trackingCode=rss
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @todaystudynote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 616,070 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“오늘 공부 노트!” (@todaystudynote), 269 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/todaystudynote.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.