#RIP freeformatter #ai #victim @todaysobirjonov

Channel
Sobirjonov Sanjarbek
@todaysobirjonov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
232subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001542789347 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @todaysobirjonov |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/todaysobirjonov |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 232 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 232 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 61.6%
- avg views ÷ 232 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 143
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.96%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,143 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
94 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 41 | 43.6% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 27.7% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 14.9% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 8.51% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 4.26% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
O’zimdagi yomon xislatlardan bittasini yo’qotish uchun buni qildim… Bugun bir sherigimni menga yoqmaydigan bir odatini unga aytdim. Sababi men o’zimda nima o’zimga tuyulmagan yomon xislat borligini bilish edi. Keyin sherigim ham turib, menga senda ham bir muammo bor dedi. U menga biror narsani aytib berishda uzoqdan olib kelib gapirishimni aytdi. To’g’ri qabul qildim. Keyin bu bo’yicha chatgpt bilan bu bo’yicha muh…
❤4
Ultra foydali insaytlar kerakmi? https://youtu.be/Jb6DcwN6mTg shu podkastda Aziz aka Rahimovdan shunaqangi bang, bang miyaga uradigan insaytlar, gaplar bo’lyapti, maza qilasiz. 14 minut ichida juda ko’p ma’lumot oldim. Tavsiya qilaman. Olgan insaytingizni yozib olib ko’rishni tavsiya qilaman ayniqsa. @todaysobirjonov
Building Our Own Claude Code in C – Part 1: Introduction Bu shunchaki tanishuv video va bir oyda yana 5ta video olaman ekan (ya’ni har hafta deyarli bitta video degani). Biz qiladigan loyiha shunga to’g’ri keldi. Boshqa loyihani kutgandim. Yaxshi bo’ldi, boshlanishiga oson loyiha lekin qiyin jarayon )) Videoni qayta-qayta olaverib jonga tegdi va shunchaki boricha oldim. Aslida kecha chiqishi kerak edi, videoni olg…
🔥4⚡1
"Kremniy vodiysi" serialidagi Gevin Belsonning "Tethicks" ni imzolashga kompaniyalarni chaqirish jarayoniga o'xshaydi :) Bitta "Pied Piper" egasi bosh tortgandi. Xuddi Anthropic'ga o'xshab. Qiziq, o'xshash hodisa)) P. S. Ochiq frontier modellarni yoqlab Nvidia ochiq xat yo'llagan. Ko'p tech kompaniyalar ma'qullab imzo chekkan. Hozircha Anthropic buni yoqlamadi. @todaysobirjonov
Siz ham aniq shuni qurboni bo’lgansiz Bob tog’aning “Clean Code” kitobi balki brendi desak ham bo’lar, shu paytlarda Linkedinda juda ko’p bahslarga sabab bo’lyapti. Buning sababi u yuqoridagi tvitni yozib qoldirganida. Bu ancha kuchaytirib yubordi bahsni. Demak, “Clean Code” shunchaki marketing vositasi va pul topish usuli bo’lganmi? Albatta, qisman ha. Lekin ko’pchilik uning muxlislari bu gapini yaxshi qabul qilm…
1-avgustda videolar qilishni boshlayman Xudo xohlasa, 1-avgustdan boshlab, bitta loyihani 1 oy (31 kun) davomida har kuni, ulgurganimizcha C da qilamiz. Videolarni joylashtirib boraman. AI Agent ishlatilmaydi. Lekin bu degani AI dan bilmagan narsalarimni savol orqali so’rab bilib olmayman deganimas. Shunchalar ahmoqona , siyqasi chiqqan savollar so’rashim mumkin-ki, shuni ham bilmaydigan bilmasvoymi deb o’ylab qolis…
👍12
“O’tkan kunlar” romani Abdulla Qodiriyning bu romanini yana bir marta o’qib chiqdim va hozirgina tugattim. 2-marta o’qishim. Diqqat bilan o’qidim. Aslida asardagi har bir jumla lego bo’laklari kabi o’z joyida so’zlangani, agar ulardan birortasi olinsa, asarni butunligiga putur yetishini tushunyapman. Biz uchun tarix bo’lgan “Tarix"ni so’zlash qanchalik qiyin bo’lgani va uni sevgi-muhabbat ortiga yashirib, g’aflatda …
⚡3🔥1
🤔 C dasturlash tilida bir proyektni olib (masalan, o’z redis yoki shellimizni C da qilish) uni qilish jarayonimni video qilib chiqarsam deyapman. C da professional emasman lekin o’zim uchun qiziq. Hech qanday AI agentsiz. Bunday video qilsam siz qanday foyda olaman deb o’ylaysiz? #no_ai #without_ai_agents @todaysobirjonov
👍5🔥5
✅ Pulni qaytarib berishdi @todaysobirjonov
👍3
Multitasking (AI zamonida bir nechta taskni bir vaqtni o’zida switch qilib ko’rish) Men bir necha yil oldin “doomscrolling” ni tashlaganman. Youtube Shorts, Instagram Reels umuman scroll qilib o’tirmayman va bundan kelgan xotirjamlik, miyani shovqindan xolos bo’lishi menga maza bergan. Lekin AI agentlar tufayli bir nechta task bo’ylab “scroll” qilish reels ko’rishdan-da ko’proq va tezroq diqqatimni pasaytirishga sab…
👍6
JSC "PAYNET" pulim qani? 2026-yil 1-iyul, soat 20:34da PAYNET ilovasi orqali Telegramdagi TON kripto hamyonimga 298,700 so'm miqdorda pul o'tkazma amalga oshirdim. Pulim hali beri hamyonimga tushmadi, deyarli 11 kun bo'ldi. Bu muddat ichida Paynet ilovasida onlayn chatga 3 marotaba (bir necha kun davomida) murojaat qildim va 24 soat kutishimni aytishgan. Ular aytgan shartni bajardim. Lekin pul yo'q. Onlayn chatdan …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @todaysobirjonov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 972,031 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sobirjonov Sanjarbek” (@todaysobirjonov), 232 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/todaysobirjonov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.