Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Жаба пишет 🌈📚

@toad_writes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

119subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002490983484
TypeChannel
Username@toad_writes
DescriptionМного про писательство и немного — про писательницу🌿 Пишу книги... и фанфики по джейвикам💜⚙️ ⚠️Строго 18+ Фикбук: https://ficbook.net/authors/0192e480-49e3-72e7-9c8e-0c757c789fb5 Анонимка: t.me/voprosy?start=9s1mz
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/toad_writes

Growth

1197 August 2026 — 119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 119 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118–120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:31119no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:00119first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
77.3%
avg views ÷ 119 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.0
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held15 (25 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,380
Reactions total256
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
878
Videos
54
Links
110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

256 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 576967369895287928210641.4%
custom 57761297262884990409135.5%
custom 6019548333524129556249.38%
custom 6019263212120185292218.20%
custom 6019117256246564358114.30%
custom 581232672711167834731.17%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC23 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

На ближайшую неделю канал превращается в тревел-блог🌊 Прилетели мы, значит, в Будапешт на музыкальный фестиваль Зиглет 🎧 В Будапеште до этого не были, и как интересно сравнивать свои ощущения от него и нашего уже любимого и родного Белграда! ✨Кажется, тут много пьют. Пабы на каждом углу, много алкашей на улицах, и я впервые за долгое время увидела в супермаркете мужика с двухлитровой бутылкой пивасика. Сербы как бу

custom 57761297262884990408custom 57696736989528792823

8 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC52 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Совершено проникновение в Евросоюз 😂

custom 576967369895287928215custom 57761297262884990404

5 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC84 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вау, у МО 500 лайков✨ Спасибо, кувшиночки мои! Каюсь, ничего не пишу вторую неделю, все силы уходят на лечение котеечки. А потом 8 дней отпуска... Надеюсь, как вернусь, допишу МО, напишу тексы в зин продолжу писать книгу. Во какие планы👍

custom 577612972628849904020custom 57696736989528792828

4 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC106 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Через недельку послушаю их вживую😳

custom 576967369895287928221custom 57761297262884990403

31 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC132 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

День социальностей какой-то! В творческой группе увидела арты джейвиков — а дальше всё как в тумане. И вот мы уже знакомимся семьями и несколько часов трындим в кафе🌟🌟 Ли потрясающе рисует, не могу насмотреться на эти арты просто! Надеюсь, это начало долгой дружбы🌟

custom 576967369895287928220custom 57761297262884990408custom 60191172562465643581

31 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC108 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот так вот читает человек на фикбуке твои истории, а ты — её, общаетесь, общаетесь, а потом бах! и уже пьёте вместе кофе❤️ Мири вообще одна из моих любимых писательниц на фб! Была невероятно рада развиртуализироваться🥰 #жаба_существует

custom 577612972628849904016custom 57696736989528792828

30 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC87 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Золотые мои, тут планируют запускать зин по Виктору😭 Надо ли говорить, что я дико хочу, чтобы этот проект увидел свет (а ещё сильнее хочу, чтобы меня взяли туда писательницей, просто пздц как аааааа 😭). Пожалуйста, пройдите опрос на проверку интереса, особенно если вы бы действительно приобрели такой зин. Скрестим пальцы!

custom 57696736989528792828

30 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC78 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @viktor_zinePhoto

Еще раз привет! Запускаем проверку интереса к зину, посвященному Виктору и его ипостасям во всех возможных реальностях 🪶 Маленький Виктор, который с восторгом смотрит на золотые крыши Пилтовера; Виктор, доказавший право быть студентом Академии; Виктор, усердно работающим над изучением свойств хекстека… Да, это все он! Но также он и Служитель Смерти, посвятивший душу ее идеям, и изобретатель, вкладывающий разум в мех

custom 57761297262884990407

29 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC99 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Жена сказала, что это — я, мой кабинет и мерч с джейвиками...😑

custom 601926321212018529214

29 Jul 2026, 06:56 UTC82 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 576967369895287928211custom 57761297262884990405custom 58123267271116783473

28 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC92 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Нашла — несу вам💐 Аккаунт на ArtStation 3D-художницы, которая была в команде по моделированию мастерской жижиков! И у неё на страничке — обзор на лабу в 360°, можно крутить телефон и осматривать каждый угол😃 Не было у них там дивана😭

custom 576967369895287928212custom 57761297262884990402

27 Jul 2026, 19:26 UTC107 views34 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Не видела нашего ангела уже больше суток. В воскресенье ей резко стало плохо, все ветеринарки закрыты, поехали в оверпрайс неотложку. И вот только сейчас, после почти бессонной ночи, поездки днём в клинику, чтобы её проведать, и спама им звонками нам наконец сообщили, что операция прошла успешно и через час можно её забирать💔 Какая же она хрупкая, и как я сильно её люблю.

custom 601954833352412955624custom 601911725624656435810

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @toad_writes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 524,377 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жаба пишет 🌈📚” (@toad_writes), 119 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toad_writes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.