приветствую. а есть фронтендщики которым нужна подработка?
😁3❤1🔥1

Channel
@tmdevs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
156subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002161466340 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @tmadevs @tmdevs |
| Description | tma devs вещают о том как надо youtube: https://youtube.com/@tmadevs github: https://github.com/tmadevs для связи: @rashdeva @vityooook |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tmdevs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 156 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 156 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
128 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 40.6% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 26.6% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 16.4% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 9.38% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2025 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tmdevs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2025 to 6 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
приветствую. а есть фронтендщики которым нужна подработка?
😁3❤1🔥1
всех с наступающим новым годом!🎅 в новом году скидок на frontend не будет, поэтому можете обращаться за качественной работой 😄 портфолио - evaa - fiva - spend.tg - НГ в virus 🦠 - etc @rashdeva
🔥10❤4
Кому-то интересно взять в работу? Ищут фронт У нас есть ряд задач по фронтенду, к которым нужно подключиться, хотел бы уточнить твою доступность Скоуп задач: 1. Сделать ревью свапов и исправить недочеты 2. Доделать взаимодействие с лимитными ордерами (смарт+бек готовы, остается добить ряд деталей по фронту) 3. Сделать интерфейсы для взаимодействия с волтами автоперестановки ликвидности в CLMM
👍2
я же думаю что все это бред полнейший и надо юзать yandex cloud. собственно скоро yaswami перенесем туда, а то мы запускаем этот космический корабль из своего сервера в подвале Ж)
❤2😁1
@Scilef поделился статьей 👀
❤1
Для тех, кто не знает как обойти ограничения Cloudflare для своего приложения: Cloudflare не работает с включенным проксированием, юзер получает первые 16кб ответа и полностью работает, если выключить проксирование, оставив его в режиме DNS-only. Смысла в этом мало, но это понимание даёт нам обойти ограничения. Что делаем: 1. Создаем доп. поддомен для ru-региона с выключенным проксированием. Например у вас мини при…
❤4🔥4
тем временнем новое приложение @fiva_yield_bot выпущено. еще одна аппка в коллекцию 😍 https://t.me/fiva_protocol/111
🔥3❤2👍2
кстати можем под ивенты добавить задания и лидерборд, думаю такое будет уже и крипто сообществам интересно
❤5🔥1
тем временем запустили наш первый реальный сервис
🤔1
Привет 🌞 Yaswami Мы официально запустились! 🚀 Yaswami — первый инструмент для управления мероприятиями в Telegram (скоро — маркетплейс) 🎟 Легко создавайте и участвуйте в мероприятиях прямо внутри Telegram 💰 Принимайте платежи на вашу кассу (Юкасса, Т-Касса, TON кошелек) ✈️ Делитесь событиями в Stories, каналах и личных сообщениях внутри Telegram 🎫 Возможность добавить абонементы 🧠 Создание ивента с помощью AI ДЕМО…
❤5
когда паракодишь с коллегой в windsurf
😁8👍2❤1
отличные же новости в том, что вышла либа https://silkhq.co/, которая дает нативный уровень взаимодействия с UI для наших TMA. Будет круто увидеть как кто-то ее вшил в свой проект, пока я не сделаю это первым и поделюсь с вами своими впечатлениями 🍷
❤3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tmdevs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tmdevs named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“tmadevs” (@tmdevs), 156 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tmdevs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.