Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Территория лица и тела

Channel

Территория лица и тела

@tlit_russia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

330subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001848548766
TypeChannel
Username@tlit_russia
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tlit_russia

Growth

329330329.516 September 2026 — 329 subscribers16 September 2026 — 329 subscribers18 September 2026 — 330 subscribers16 September 202618 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 329–330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:21330+1
16 Sept 2026, 11:22329no change
16 Sept 2026, 10:47329first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 330 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.5
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held20 (23 August 202616 September 2026)
Views total1,473
Reactions total133
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52268598965399891412316.5%
custom 54158254266332028402215.8%
custom 53642014358587448691510.8%
custom 54157839157742894481510.8%
custom 5330125947016335549139.35%
custom 5424972835095329742139.35%
custom 5199540425613930331128.63%
custom 5404614939220391123107.19%
custom 525804776290519099896.47%
custom 521550621062255422164.32%
custom 525605584297265141010.719%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tlit_russia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 August 2026 to 16 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2026, 09:44 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🔔 Repart снова в наличии! Отличная новость для всех, кто ждал! Препарат Repart опять доступен. Не упустите возможность пройти качественные процедуры по привлекательным ценам: 💧 Repart 6 Delicate — 5000 ₽ 💧 Repart 5 Active — 7000 ₽ 💧 Repart 4 Aqua Balance — 5500 ₽ 💧 Repart PG — 19 500 ₽ 💧 Repart PLA — 41 000 ₽ ✨ Красота и уход — теперь ещё доступнее. Количество ограничено, успейте записаться!

custom 52268598965399891411

15 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 16 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54249728350953297422

13 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC56 views14 reactions1 Starread 16 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52268598965399891414custom 54249728350953297423custom 53301259470163355492custom 54046149392203911232custom 51995404256139303311custom 53642014358587448691custom 54158254266332028401

12 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC66 views3 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Poll

На каком вы сейчас этапе знакомства с косметологией? 🤍

  1. Есть опыт и с инъекционными, и с аппаратными процедурами30%
  2. Были только инъекционные процедуры10%
  3. Были только аппаратные процедуры20%
  4. Были только уходовые процедуры10%
  5. Процедур ещё не было, но хочу попробовать20%
  6. Пока только присматриваюсь10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52268598965399891411custom 53642014358587448691custom 54158254266332028401

11 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC69 views5 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52580477629051909982custom 54158254266332028402custom 54157839157742894481

11 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 16 September 2026

Вам не нужно выбирать препарат самостоятельно 🤍 За последние дни мы много говорили об инъекционной косметологии. И закончить эту тему хочется одной простой мыслью: на консультацию не нужно приходить уже с названием препарата в голове. Достаточно прийти со своим запросом. Дальше задача специалиста — оценить состояние кожи, показания и понять, какое решение действительно будет уместно именно в вашем случае. А тепе

custom 51995404256139303311custom 54249728350953297421

11 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC73 views2 reactions1 Starread 16 September 2026
Photo

Небольшое обновление по прайсу 🤍 Изменения коснутся только ряда процедур. Актуальную стоимость всегда можно уточнить при записи. #косметология #ТЛИТ #прайсТЛИТ #косметологмосква

custom 54158254266332028402

10 Sept 2026, 11:32 UTC77 views2 reactions1 Starread 16 September 2026

​​Если после утреннего знакомства захотелось прийти к Эльвире Яшаровне лично — запись уже открыта 🤍 Завтра у неё есть возможность принять первых гостей ТЛИТ. Можно прийти на консультацию, обсудить состояние кожи, уход и подходящие эстетические процедуры — спокойно, без спешки и навязывания. Записаться к Эльвире Яшаровне можно уже на завтра. 📍 ТЛИТ • Территория лица и тела Москва, Ратная, 8к2 Запись через DIKIDI

custom 51995404256139303311custom 52580477629051909981

10 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC74 views10 reactions1 Starread 16 September 2026
Photo

✨ Долгожданные новости! Встречайте нового специалиста в нашей команде! Мы рады сообщить, что к нам присоединилась Мирзоева Эльвира Яшаровна — косметолог-эстетист с фундаментальным медицинским образованием. 👩‍⚕️ Образование и квалификация: 🎓 СГМУ им. В. И. Разумовского (2024 г.) Факультет: Лечебное дело Специальность: Врач-лечебник 🎓 ЦГМА «Управления делами президента РФ» (2027 г.) Факультет: Дерматовенерология Спе

custom 52268598965399891413custom 54157839157742894483custom 52580477629051909982custom 53642014358587448692

9 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC73 views7 reactionsread 16 September 2026

​​«Какой препарат у вас самый хороший?» Такой вопрос на консультации мы слышим довольно часто. И правильнее здесь спросить: для какой задачи? В косметологии нет одного препарата, который был бы «лучшим» для всех. Коже может не хватать увлажнения, плотности, ровного тона — и задачи у каждого случая разные. Иногда действительно нужна инъекционная методика. А иногда лучшим решением становится совсем другой подход.

custom 51995404256139303312custom 52268598965399891411custom 53642014358587448691custom 54046149392203911231custom 54157839157742894481custom 54158254266332028401

9 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC70 views6 reactionsread 16 September 2026

А должен ли клиент вообще выбирать препарат самостоятельно? 🤔 Сегодня вечером разберём, что действительно важно при выборе.

custom 53642014358587448694custom 52268598965399891411custom 54046149392203911231

9 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC70 views8 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Poll

А вы обычно как выбираете препарат для косметологической процедуры?

  1. По рекомендации косметолога75%
  2. Читаю отзывы и выбираю по ним0%
  3. Смотрю на известность бренда / рекламу0%
  4. Спрашиваю, что делали знакомые0%
  5. Не выбираю препарат — доверяю специалисту25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52268598965399891413custom 54158254266332028403custom 53642014358587448692

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tlit_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

На каком вы сейчас этапе знакомства с косметологией? 🤍

  1. Есть опыт и с инъекционными, и с аппаратными процедурами30%
  2. Были только инъекционные процедуры10%
  3. Были только аппаратные процедуры20%
  4. Были только уходовые процедуры10%
  5. Процедур ещё не было, но хочу попробовать20%
  6. Пока только присматриваюсь10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

А вы обычно как выбираете препарат для косметологической процедуры?

  1. По рекомендации косметолога75%
  2. Читаю отзывы и выбираю по ним0%
  3. Смотрю на известность бренда / рекламу0%
  4. Спрашиваю, что делали знакомые0%
  5. Не выбираю препарат — доверяю специалисту25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 16 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Физики и Юрики
@FizAndYur · 24,088
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
Кямиль Аскерханов - Мнение
@KamilAskerkhanov · 23,594
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Территория лица и тела” (@tlit_russia), 330 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tlit_russia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.