Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TLDR Ivan Golov

Channel

TLDR Ivan Golov

@tldrivan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

60subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001824544543
TypeChannel
Username@tldrivan
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/tldrivan

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

606160.57 August 2026 — 61 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61 subscribers29 August 2026 — 60 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 09:5360-1
10 Aug 2026, 04:4561no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:2361first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 22 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1344.8%
❤1034.5%
❤‍🔥26.90%
🏆26.90%
👍13.45%
🙏13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2025 to 1 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Mar 2026, 15:58 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🏆2🙏1

28 Jan 2026, 18:11 UTC160 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Видео, как я провел детство У нас было все: 1) Собака лайка наполовину волк 🐺 и просто волки тоже у кого-то были. 2) Строганина, нарезанная тонкими ломтями мороженая рыба - круче чем сашим. 3) Моя старшая сестра на улице прилипала языком к забору. А сам я прилипал к сосульке, к сосульке было лучше - можно было домой добежать. А сестра ждала на улице папу с кружкой горячей воды. Не дождалась, оторвалась сама от заб…

❤9🔥1

22 May 2025, 15:10 UTC278 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Любимый фильм про конец света 🎇 Вернулся в кино клуб, снова каждую неделю обсуждаем знаковое кино в группе. Пока мой фаворит Меланхолия Ларса фон Триера. Две истории одной семьи. 1: Клер, талантливая копирайтер выходит за муж в загородом поместье своей богатой сестры. Но тщательно спланированное торжество идет коту под хвост, когда у Клер разыгрался приступ депрессии. 2: Та же загородная идиллия, но на этот раз …

🔥7❤‍🔥2

8 May 2025, 06:16 UTC227 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что вы делаете, чтобы лучше «оптимизироваться» под ai поиск и как ищете сами, когда это касается бизнес задач?

🔥3❤1

7 Apr 2025, 11:12 UTC243 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

А вы благодарите AI за работу?

  1. Я да69%
  2. Нет, это же компьютер38%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Mar 2025, 13:17 UTC209 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📸 Историческое фото: лидеры Trucial States 1965 года - будущие основатели ОАЭ. На снимках правители: 1. Shaikh Shakhbut Bin Sultan Al Boofalah - Старший брат того самого Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan of Abu Dhabi 2. Sheikh Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum of Dubai 3. Sheikh Khalid bin Mohammed Al Qasimi of Sharjah 4. Sheikh Ahmad bin Rashid Al Mualla of Umm Al Quwain 5. Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi of Ajman 6. …

🔥2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @tldrivan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Apr 2025, 11:12 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

А вы благодарите AI за работу?

  1. Я да69%
  2. Нет, это же компьютер38%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2025 to 1 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TLDR Ivan Golov” (@tldrivan), 60 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tldrivan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.