Channel
@tlabvc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,619subscribers
-84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002029497001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tlabvc |
| Description | T-LAB — venture builder and accelerator for Telegram & TON apps ecosystem Drop us a line: https://tlab.vc |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tlabvc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 9,619 | -39 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 9,658 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 9,695 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 9,703 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
147 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 75 | 51.0% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 18.4% | |
| 🤮 | 14 | 9.52% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 8.84% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 7.48% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.72% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 3 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tlabvc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 January 2025 to 3 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔹 Our partners TON Cats introduce a new investment game – PawPower INVEST (PPI) 🔹 The TON Cats project, a well-established player in the TON ecosystem, is launching an innovative investment game based on the Tap2Invest model. What makes PPI unique? ✔ Instant earnings – instead of waiting for airdrops, participants can immediately generate profit in $TON. ✔ 200% profit at launch – early participants gain the most b…
🤮14👎9👍6❤1
🔒 Don’t Repeat Bybit’s Mistake: How to Protect Your Crypto Assets Recently, Bybit was hacked by North Korean hackers for $1.5 billion. In light of this, here’s a reminder of essential Web3 security rules: 📊 Use Cold Wallets 🔵 Store the majority of your funds in hardware wallets like Ledger or Trezor. 🔵 Keep only small amounts in hot wallets for daily transactions. 🔎 Always Verify Transactions 🔵 Double-check every …
👍3👎1
Consensus HK 2025: Telegram, TON, and the Future of DeFi On February 20, the final day of Consensus 2025 took place in Hong Kong, featuring speeches by Steve Yun (TON Foundation, TVM Ventures) and Jack Booth (TON Society). Here are the key takeaways: 🤑 Steve Yun: — The partnership between Telegram and TON helps attract users and simplifies access to on-chain products. — Social trading is the future of crypto. The t…
👎1
TON x LayerZero TON is now officially connected to 12 blockchains, including Ethereum, Tron, and Solana, thanks to its partnership with LayerZero. 💸 USDT can now be transferred between Ethereum, Arbitrum, Tron, and TON. This integration will make cross-chain transfers faster and more convenient, give TON access to a wider range of DeFi protocols, and significantly boost the ecosystem’s liquidity. 👍 T-LAB • Chat •…
❤5👎1
✉️ Telegram Update – New Features! Telegram keeps leveling up—now the messenger is better for videos, smarter with AI, and more useful for channels. Here’s the full list of updates: 📹 Video Features: — You can share links to specific moments in a video — Custom video covers are now available — The player remembers where you left off 🤖 AI-Powered Sticker Search: — Previously worked only with official sticker packs—…
🇦🇷 The President Who Didn’t Sleep on February 15 Over the weekend, Javier Milei unexpectedly promoted the $LIBRA token on his X account, claiming it would help small businesses. What happened next? 🔵Market cap skyrocketed to $4.5B. 🔵Milei deleted the post, stating he "wasn't aware of all the details." 🔵Insiders made $107M, while the token crashed by -94%. #️⃣ Now, the opposition is calling for his impeachment, and…
😁4❤1👍1👎1
Interview with the Founder of TVM Ventures & the Future of TON TVM Ventures founder Steve Yun gave an interview, and we’ve gathered the key takeaways: 🔵 Where does the funding come from? The fund was created using Yun’s personal funds and investments from a Toncoin miner. 🔵 How is TVM Ventures different from TON Ventures? Its focus is on building a global financial network, not gaming. Telegram is the perfect plat…
🎁 Telegram Gifts on GetGems Telegram Gifts are rapidly taking over the NFT market, and we’ve gathered the most exciting sales figures: 🔘Total trading volume — 52K+ $TON 🔘Total sales — 5,400+ Top collections by sales volume: 🎁 Plush Pepes — 22K+ $TON 🎁 Durov's Caps — 6.9K+ $TON 🎁 Signet Rings — 6.4K+ $TON 🔘Most expensive sale: Plush Pepe #212 — sold for 6,500 $TON 🔘Biggest collector: 600+ gifts on a single wallet …
🤑 TON 2024 Report TON has released its 2024 statistical report: 🔵 36.2M new wallets created—55x growth compared to the previous year. 🔵 1.8M daily active wallets on average, with up to 40M monthly active addresses. 🔵 1,700+ Mini App developers earned $60M through the Telegram Stars program. TON continues to gain momentum, and 2025 promises to be even bigger! 👍 T-LAB • Chat • DUROV RUN • Planeton • Maia.me
👍7
⭐️ The End of Convenient Telegram Stars Purchases Buying Stars through third-party services no longer works. The reason? Google Play and App Store requirements. 💸 Now, purchases are only available through @PremiumBot via in-app payments. Are the restrictions final, or will a new workaround emerge? 👍 T-LAB • Chat • DUROV RUN • Planeton • Maia.me
👍5😱2❤1🤯1
TVM Ventures — A New Venture Fund in TON Former TON Foundation president Steve Yun has announced the launch of TVM Ventures — a $100M fund dedicated to investing in the TON ecosystem. 💰 Funding Allocation: — $500K to $1M for early-stage startups — Up to $5M in liquidity for DeFi protocols 💼 Current Investments: — Factorial — Torch Finance — Fiva — Memes Lab Which project will receive support next? Share your thou…
👍2❤1
🎁 Telegram Gift Minting is Live, But There Are Some Caveats Telegram gifts can now be tokenized and traded on xRare, Market app, and Getgems. 🔵 What You Need to Know: — Minting requires KYC on Fragment. — Reverse transfer is possible, but you can’t return it to your profile without KYC. — The launch wasn’t entirely smooth: bugs, stuck transactions, and unprepared marketplaces. For now, it looks like a test run, bu…
👍19🔥11❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tlabvc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“T-LAB • Venture Builder” (@tlabvc), 9,619 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tlabvc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.