Channel
@tk5979
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
316subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002209288601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tk5979 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tk5979 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 316 | +34 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 282 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 284 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 284 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (8 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,232 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#Angel工作日常ing~ 每個月最重要的環節已完成~ 妹妹們的 #身體健康檢查 都安排上啦～ 這是不夜谷每個月必備的流程之一，這也是Angel一直以來最重視、親自把關的部分 8月的身體檢查已經完成啦😉 大大們放心享受，Angel不只把大家把關性福，也確保每位妹妹都能以最健康、最好的狀態 來為大大們提供服務，所有安排都是在安全、透明、乾淨的前提下進行，Angel會持續替大家把好每一道關卡💖 #讓大大們約前安心約後舒心😉
#東京 #私房菜 #無照 🎀ノ瀬美玲 160.F.24.46kg #平面模特 童顔巨乳本人，小隻可愛臉脫衣身材爆辣有料，視覺感拉滿！妥妥的 #清純無害臉下的犯規身材 有胸有臀有曲綫無小腹！愛愛中帶點小嬌羞 #無sop #無職業感 女友感體現的淋漓盡致！ 💰VIP價：150000一節 💰VIP價：買二送一 VIP反饋1️⃣ 妹妹真的可愛，真E奶很大很軟，我一上手就捨不得放開，她也很配合地讓我盡情享受，感覺出來的不多有點小害羞但是配合度極高，我叫她躺著，她就很乖地配合各種姿勢，聲音甜美又誘人，後半段她越來越投入，叫聲越來越可愛，結束後還溫柔地幫我清理，陪我聊天，過程很讚，值得嘗試 SVIP反饋2️⃣ 身材像女優，她性格很好 活潑開朗 又不急 在上在下都玩了，側著也有。最後從後面結束 身材沒得比 超大超挺，沒改 嬌小可愛性格超好 #還是白虎喔 真的很像女優 她蠻有市場的 都像 指甲也像性格應該也像！ SVIP反饋3️⃣ 妹…
🎉不夜谷五週年慶典&中秋博餅🎉 不知不覺，Angel已經在日本經營第五年了🥹 一路走來，真的非常感謝每一位支持與信任我的新朋友、老朋友，雖然這幾年間換過幾次帳號，也經歷了不少挑戰，但依然有許多陪伴了我五年的老朋友一路支持著我，這份信任我牢記於心，謝謝大家願意把朋友介紹給我，謝謝大家一次又一次的捧場，讓我的小小事業能夠一步一步走到今天 今年適逢不夜谷五週年，又迎來一年一度的中秋佳節，Angel先預祝大家中秋“佳”節快樂🌕 有句話說得好「無博餅，不中秋」又是中秋又是週年慶，怎麼能少了福利呢？ Angel特別準備了【中秋博餅大賽】依照博餅規則，不同的“科舉”對應不同的“豪禮”！ 未來Angel也會繼續努力，提供更好的服務、更優質的妹妹、更美好的體驗，謝謝大家五年的陪伴，期待未來還能和大家一起創造更多美好的回憶❤️❤️ 科舉 狀元 榜眼 探花 進士 舉人 秀才 入門博 消費10W以下2️⃣次 初級博 消費20W以下4️⃣次 中…
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「VIP高檔茶💎封面女郎」 🧸凰坂純香 172.E.27.52kg 🧸高挑清秀漂亮很有氣質 會打扮 性感穿搭風格 #她有在接外拍的同時也是XX簽約的封面女郎，仟細美腿在聚光燈下鹹的格外出境，不敢的表情還是神態超有意境，擁有超模氣質的身材，態度性格優良，妥妥的完美女友 ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「VIP高檔茶💎藝術大學校花」 🧸紗里奈 162.C.20.45kg 🧸清秀甜美正妹 顔值高 玲瓏有緻的身材 讓人忍不住想要靠近擁抱 有著清新脫俗的外表 白皙無瑕的肌膚 給人一種純淨無染的感覺。她非常注重個人衛生，私密處保養得無微不至，白嫩的私密處毫無異味，柔嫩光滑 #粉嫩白虎，讓人欲罷不能。她體質敏感，輕輕一觸，便濕潤滿溢 獲人心的狐狸，勾起人心最原始的渴望 ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「VIP高檔茶💎IG網美」 🧸星乃芽 155.E.23.44kg 🧸氣質不失知性 性感辣妹身材 床上配合的集合會讓你嗨到爆 難以拒絕的美女噢 床上技巧嫻熟 大膽 理性與感性的柔和 會和你一起洗事後澡 可貼心了 ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「VIP高檔茶💎時尚品牌形象模特」 🧸水瀨麗奈 167.D.24.47kg 🧸精緻冷豔的臉蛋不僅渾圓飽滿的雙峰，纖細的小蠻腰搭配性感的蜜桃臀相得益彰，比例完美曲線優美迷人，身型火辣，渾身散發著性感魅惑的氣息，讓你心馳神往，無法自拔 ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
#東京VIP高檔茶推薦 東京 愛麗絲奈「簽約藝人」 VIP高檔茶‹💎› 💗 𝐀𝐠𝐞：26 💗 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐭：E 💗 𝐖𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭：48kg 💗 𝐇𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭：170cm 💗 𝐇𝐨𝐛𝐛𝐲：擁有清秀御姐臉蛋，170公分E罩杯的逆天比例，加上讓人過目不忘的御姐臉蛋，一雙筆直長腿甚至被粉絲戲稱為「真人九頭身」，還未接觸影視行業之前在社群平台累積大量粉絲，是不少攝影師爭相合作的對象，尤其最強美腿更是收服不少老司機的關鍵，後來被影視公司挖掘成功從網美轉型為藝人，憑藉網美背景與誘人的九頭身迅速打開知名度，26歲的年紀卻維持著近乎苛刻的身材管理，腰是腰，腿是腿，該有的地方有，不該有的地方一點都沒有！透過熟人介紹才認識Angel，因為本身仍有演藝相關工作與公開身份，所以唯一要求就是 #必須低調 #不公開身份 #只接受預約安排 有預算來！ 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878
❤1
#東京VIP高檔茶推薦 東京 如月杏奈「平面超模」 VIP高檔茶‹💎› 💗 𝐀𝐠𝐞：28 💗 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐭：E 💗 𝐖𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭：50kg 💗 𝐇𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭：170cm 💗 𝐇𝐨𝐛𝐛𝐲：溫柔柔美的五官略帶女人的韻味 魅惑雙眼 貌似在放電 S腰身E罩杯 #好身材藏都藏不住 28歲的年齡 24歲的皮膚白裡透紅的滑嫩肌膚是每個男人的最愛 #零打槍 #顔控必點 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @tk5979. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 116,590 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“不夜谷の東京VIP高檔茶🎀” (@tk5979), 316 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tk5979.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.