Channel
@tk5373
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
195subscribers
+49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003182700211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tk5373 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tk5373 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 195 | +49 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 146 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 146 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (28 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,022 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「優質茶💎藝人舞美」 🧸北川景子 162.C.23.46kg 🧸清秀的臉蛋搭配簡約風穿搭 韓系感好足！顔值高 身材小隻好操控 是清秀正妹也是粘人小貓咪 #顔控閉眼衝 ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「優質茶💎平面模特」 🧸Aimi 168.D.25.49kg 🧸臉蛋漂亮有氣質 很會穿搭的高顏值辣妹 性感身材誘人的穿搭 皮膚白皙水嫩 美腿修長身段柔美 互動很有女友Fu 可配合變裝唷 ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「優質茶💎Gucci專櫃」 🧸玲香 170.B.27.49kg 🧸美女銷售精英 她自己本人長得就很正漂亮妹妹一個 加上她用的口紅也是她自己想銷售的引來了一大批顧客來找她買口紅 在她工作風生水起的時候卻遇到了 她以為的白馬王子 最後被劈腿 也因她戀愛的時間 她體驗過了愛愛的享受感 讓她對性愛上面有很大的興趣 利用她本身的優勢 來不夜谷這邊報班 性慾強外貌正會玩勾引 挑逗 玩法多變 把自身的優點用的淋漓盡致 要身材有身材要顔值有顔值 要服務有服務 這個就是所謂“夢中情人” ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
❤1
#Angel工作日常ing~ 每個月最重要的環節已完成~ 妹妹們的 #身體健康檢查 都安排上啦～ 這是不夜谷每個月必備的流程之一，這也是Angel一直以來最重視、親自把關的部分 8月的身體檢查已經完成啦😉 大大們放心享受，Angel不只把大家把關性福，也確保每位妹妹都能以最健康、最好的狀態 來為大大們提供服務，所有安排都是在安全、透明、乾淨的前提下進行，Angel會持續替大家把好每一道關卡💖 #讓大大們約前安心約後舒心😉
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「優質茶💎網拍模特」 🧸理沙 165.E.25.48kg 🧸身材火辣！性感小蠻腰 胸部有彈性 騷 辣 敢玩 喜歡享受愛愛過程 主動熱情 讓你體驗滿滿的女友FU 69 殘廢澡 奶泡 通通不是問題 喜歡一邊舌吻一邊愛愛 外貌正點 身材比例超讚！ ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「優質茶💎酒櫃銷售」 🧸優希 167.C.26.48kg 🧸“門面招牌”正值完美女人年紀，每天都會抽出時間鍛煉身體，練習普拉提和瑜伽，因此擁有強大的耐力。她身高高挑，她性格親和，易相處，讓人倍感舒適。最值得一提的是她的粉嫩緊緻，敏感多汁的私處，據說擁有這種私處的女生性慾都很強。她還會製造約會的氣氛，偶爾自備衣服，帶給你一場完美的約會體驗 ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
#東京 #私房菜 #無照 🎀ノ瀬美玲 160.F.24.46kg #平面模特 童顔巨乳本人，小隻可愛臉脫衣身材爆辣有料，視覺感拉滿！妥妥的 #清純無害臉下的犯規身材 有胸有臀有曲綫無小腹！愛愛中帶點小嬌羞 #無sop #無職業感 女友感體現的淋漓盡致！ 💰VIP價：150000一節 💰VIP價：買二送一 VIP反饋1️⃣ 妹妹真的可愛，真E奶很大很軟，我一上手就捨不得放開，她也很配合地讓我盡情享受，感覺出來的不多有點小害羞但是配合度極高，我叫她躺著，她就很乖地配合各種姿勢，聲音甜美又誘人，後半段她越來越投入，叫聲越來越可愛，結束後還溫柔地幫我清理，陪我聊天，過程很讚，值得嘗試 SVIP反饋2️⃣ 身材像女優，她性格很好 活潑開朗 又不急 在上在下都玩了，側著也有。最後從後面結束 身材沒得比 超大超挺，沒改 嬌小可愛性格超好 #還是白虎喔 真的很像女優 她蠻有市場的 都像 指甲也像性格應該也像！ SVIP反饋3️⃣ 妹…
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「優質茶💎舞蹈系花」 🧸如月澪奈 164.C.21.46kg 🧸小巧玲瓏的身形，細腰美腿，迷人又養眼的穿搭，好聊天很會撒嬌，好相處無壓力😘粉嫩內在可吸可舔，白嫩上圍任你揉捏，乖巧聽話好配合，給你滿滿女友FU ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
🎉不夜谷五週年慶典&中秋博餅🎉 不知不覺，Angel已經在日本經營第五年了🥹 一路走來，真的非常感謝每一位支持與信任我的新朋友、老朋友，雖然這幾年間換過幾次帳號，也經歷了不少挑戰，但依然有許多陪伴了我五年的老朋友一路支持著我，這份信任我牢記於心，謝謝大家願意把朋友介紹給我，謝謝大家一次又一次的捧場，讓我的小小事業能夠一步一步走到今天 今年適逢不夜谷五週年，又迎來一年一度的中秋佳節，Angel先預祝大家中秋“佳”節快樂🌕 有句話說得好「無博餅，不中秋」又是中秋又是週年慶，怎麼能少了福利呢？ Angel特別準備了【中秋博餅大賽】依照博餅規則，不同的“科舉”對應不同的“豪禮”！ 未來Angel也會繼續努力，提供更好的服務、更優質的妹妹、更美好的體驗，謝謝大家五年的陪伴，期待未來還能和大家一起創造更多美好的回憶❤️❤️ 科舉 狀元 榜眼 探花 進士 舉人 秀才 入門博 消費10W以下2️⃣次 初級博 消費20W以下4️⃣次 中…
⭐⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 「優質茶💎音樂導師」 🧸雅美 169.D.26.48kg 🧸漂亮氣質的溫柔女孩擁有迷人的魅力，皮膚白嫩細滑皮膚白嫩細滑 敏感點激發到高潮不斷 她不僅聲音迷人，還會撒嬌般地嬌喘，讓人沉醉在她的柔情中 女上位時，她騎乘的身姿充滿誘惑，呻吟聲更是讓人無法自拔 ➡️🗼東京專區 ➡️🏯大阪專區 📩Angel⭐ JP8689 📩Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 📩Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 📩官 網🌐 www.JP838.com ୨୧始於相遇✨終於素質୨୧
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @tk5373. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 64,435 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“不夜谷の東京優質茶🎀” (@tk5373), 195 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tk5373.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.