Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Тишина.Лаб

@tishina_lab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

285subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004405035219
TypeChannel
Username@tishina_lab
Created8 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tishina_lab

Growth

274285279.56 Aug 2026, 02:21 — 274 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 274 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:45 — 285 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 02:217 Aug 2026, 00:45
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 272–287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 00:45285+11
6 Aug 2026, 23:32274no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:21274first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
901.5%
avg views ÷ 285 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,570
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.488%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (8 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total33,400
Reactions total163
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9357.1%
🔥4427.0%
1911.7%
💯53.07%
👏21.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC≈1,010 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Приводим информацию о настройке ЛЧМ помехи для РЭБ типа Силок на основе данных от РЭР "Тишина". По данным радиоразведки вы получите ширину ППРЧ и значение SF - его нужно будет перевести в значение "Период ЛЧМ". Сохраняйте к себе и используйте.

👍85🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,130 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Напомним, что помимо сборок для windows/linux есть и вариант серверной части, адаптированной под небольшие носимые экраны/планшеты 800x480.

👍92🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC≈7,500 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А что с подавлением MILELRS 4? Давайте разберем, какие важные отличия есть в ППРЧ MILERLS с точки зрения подавления. Во-первых, это длина ППРЧ - 2^24. При SF=7, packet rate - 82 Гц и при передаче двух пакетов на канале до перехода на следующий канал это дает нам 113 часов полета, спустя которые последовательность начнет повторяться. Во-вторых, число каналов - 65536, что при ширине полосы, например, 20 МГц дает шаг

🔥10👍81

29 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,680 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Давит ли РЭР "Тишина" дроны и как? Распространяемое нами в данное время программное обеспечение относится к классу средств радиоэлектронной разведки, то есть призвано вскрыть каналы управления FPV и определить их параметры, в частности, ширину ППРЧ и SF (spreading factor). Само по себе средство РЭР "Тишина" не самодостаточно: для подавления на основе полученной информации вам необходим РЭБ с возможностью постановки

👍72

28 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC≈1,490 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Передали прошивку РЭР "Тишина" для команды, разрабатывающей "Огонек": они встраивают обнаружение каналов управления в носимый анализатор спектра - https://t.me/podaviteldronov/483 Для удобства использования на небольшом тач-экране также адаптировали для них интерфейс. Хочется пожелать ребятам успехов, ведь реализация подобного обнаружения на носимом устройстве - непростая инженерная задача.

👍9🔥31

26 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC≈3,860 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Приводим ответы на наиболее частые вопросы по РЭР "Тишина". Как зарекомендовал себя РЭР "Тишина" в ходе апробации/эксплуатации? Мы сами испытывали и применяли комплекс на ЛБС: видели то, что реально есть, и не видели того, чего нет. Дальность обнаружения (определялась на основе понимания позиции FPV по данным отдельного видеоперехвата, подтверждалась при воздействии на дрон помехами) составляла 10-19 км. Также в н

👍133🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,440 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Невозможное сегодня станет возможным завтра». К.Э. Циолковский

👍6💯5🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,880 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Верно пишет товарищ Туман - https://t.me/content84/7959 Я это к тому, что сильно сомневаюсь что сейчас летают на обычном ELRS, а поправить/добавить туда что-то несложно... Сначала уточним, что приведенное нами видео https://t.me/tishina_lab/16 - это результат не дизарма, а срыва синхронизации. То есть мы специальным образом формируем пакет, этот пакет обрабатывается приемником FPV в соответствие с логикой работы п

👍9🔥3

24 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC≈5,510 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Что такое РЭР "Тишина"? На данный момент это комплект специального программного обеспечения. Ядром является модуль детекции, устанавливаемый на широкополосный SDR. Модуль управляется по сети и также по сети отдает информацию о детектируемых пакетах LoRa. Модуль работает в режиме реального времени, то есть на вход - полоса эфира шириной 50 МГц, на выход - информация обо всех обнаруженных в эфире пакетах с информацией

👍124🔥4

23 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC910 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Помимо теоретических разборов различных видов помех и особенностей протоколов хочется поделиться практическими результатами. На видео пример подавления FPV узкополосной помехой на основе данных от РЭР "Тишина". Дальность подавления - 12 км, ширина помехи - 500 кГц, мощность усилителя - 50 Вт. Проверено в боевых условиях.

🔥10👍2👏1

22 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC≈3,880 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мы более года занимаемся вопросами радиоразведки и подавления каналов управления дронами, поэтому не могли пройти мимо поста товарища Душнилы: https://t.me/zas_svo/1055 Зацепил пост от разработчиков, которые сделали свой канал телеметрии и управления для дронов и полезли изучать рынок «военных» решений связи. Вердикт короткий и злой: в 99% случаев это китайский модуль LoRa, всратая 3D-печать и антенны из говна и пал

🔥6👍41

21 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC≈1,120 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Краткий вывод из всех тестов: если мы знаем ширину ППРЧ и SF, то можем давить на дальностях x4 относительно широкополосной помехи.

👍3🔥2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tishina_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 733,933 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тишина.Лаб” (@tishina_lab), 285 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tishina_lab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.